Physiotherapeutische Forschungsaktivitäten an den deutschen Universitätskliniken: eine Online-Umfrage unter den Leitungen der physiotherapeutischen Abteilungen

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Erik J. Ehlers , Franziska Feldmann , Judith Gartmann , Carolin Kraushaar , Annalena Paus , Isabelle Stickdorn , Susanne G.R. Klotz
{"title":"Physiotherapeutische Forschungsaktivitäten an den deutschen Universitätskliniken: eine Online-Umfrage unter den Leitungen der physiotherapeutischen Abteilungen","authors":"Erik J. Ehlers ,&nbsp;Franziska Feldmann ,&nbsp;Judith Gartmann ,&nbsp;Carolin Kraushaar ,&nbsp;Annalena Paus ,&nbsp;Isabelle Stickdorn ,&nbsp;Susanne G.R. Klotz","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>German university hospitals, with their three pillars of research, teaching, and care, enjoy a special status in the health care and science system. Alongside care and teaching, the research pillar has also become increasingly relevant for physiotherapy at university hospitals. Nevertheless, there has been no comprehensive study to date of the status of physiotherapy research activities at German university hospitals. This study aims to provide an overview of research activities and their framework conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the heads of physiotherapy departments at all 36 German university hospitals in order to collect data on physiotherapy research activities. The questionnaire used for this purpose was developed in advance with the help of a systematic literature review and an expert survey. The survey was analyzed descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a response rate of 58%, eight of the 21 university hospitals included in the survey have been conducting physiotherapy research, in some cases for over a decade. The most frequently reported obstacles to research are lack of financial resources (n = 10) and lack of interest or appreciation from other professions (n = 7). Most frequently, research projects are conducted in the medical specialties of orthopedics and trauma surgery (n = 10), intensive care medicine (n = 8), pediatrics (n = 6), and the outpatient sector (n = 6). Clinical research accounts for 58% (n = 18) of research activities. Interprofessional research is more common (n = 13, 72%) than intraprofessional research (n = 5, 28%). In addition to the CRediT roles of resources (n = 6) and investigation (n = 6), the role of conceptualization in the research process (n = 6) is also among the most common. Over the two-year period, a median of three articles was published with first or last authorship assigned to physiotherapists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The online survey shows that there is little physiotherapy research activity at German university hospitals. In order to strengthen physiotherapy research, changes in professional and scientific policy and financial support are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921725000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

German university hospitals, with their three pillars of research, teaching, and care, enjoy a special status in the health care and science system. Alongside care and teaching, the research pillar has also become increasingly relevant for physiotherapy at university hospitals. Nevertheless, there has been no comprehensive study to date of the status of physiotherapy research activities at German university hospitals. This study aims to provide an overview of research activities and their framework conditions.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the heads of physiotherapy departments at all 36 German university hospitals in order to collect data on physiotherapy research activities. The questionnaire used for this purpose was developed in advance with the help of a systematic literature review and an expert survey. The survey was analyzed descriptively.

Results

With a response rate of 58%, eight of the 21 university hospitals included in the survey have been conducting physiotherapy research, in some cases for over a decade. The most frequently reported obstacles to research are lack of financial resources (n = 10) and lack of interest or appreciation from other professions (n = 7). Most frequently, research projects are conducted in the medical specialties of orthopedics and trauma surgery (n = 10), intensive care medicine (n = 8), pediatrics (n = 6), and the outpatient sector (n = 6). Clinical research accounts for 58% (n = 18) of research activities. Interprofessional research is more common (n = 13, 72%) than intraprofessional research (n = 5, 28%). In addition to the CRediT roles of resources (n = 6) and investigation (n = 6), the role of conceptualization in the research process (n = 6) is also among the most common. Over the two-year period, a median of three articles was published with first or last authorship assigned to physiotherapists.

Conclusion

The online survey shows that there is little physiotherapy research activity at German university hospitals. In order to strengthen physiotherapy research, changes in professional and scientific policy and financial support are needed.
[德国大学医院的物理治疗研究活动:对物理治疗部门负责人的在线调查]。
德国大学医院以科研、教学、护理为三大支柱,在卫生保健和科学体系中享有特殊地位。除了护理和教学之外,研究支柱也与大学医院的物理治疗越来越相关。然而,迄今为止尚未对德国大学医院的物理治疗研究活动状况进行全面研究。本研究旨在概述研究活动及其框架条件。方法:对德国所有36所大学附属医院的物理治疗部门负责人进行横断面在线调查,以收集有关物理治疗研究活动的数据。用于此目的的问卷是在系统的文献回顾和专家调查的帮助下事先制定的。对调查进行了描述性分析。结果:参与调查的21家大学医院中,有8家一直在进行物理治疗研究,有的已经进行了10多年,回复率为58%。最常见的研究障碍是缺乏财政资源( = 10)和缺乏其他专业的兴趣或赞赏( = 7)。最常见的研究项目是在骨科和创伤外科( = 10)、重症监护医学( = 8)、儿科( = 6)和门诊部( = 6)等医学专业进行的。临床研究占研究活动的58% (n = 18)。跨专业研究(n = 13,72%)比专业内研究(n = 5,28%)更为常见。除了资源(n = 6)和调查(n = 6)的信用作用外,概念化在研究过程中的作用(n = 6)也是最常见的。在这两年期间,发表的第一或最后作者为物理治疗师的文章中位数为三篇。结论:在线调查显示,德国大学医院的物理治疗研究活动很少。加强物理治疗研究,需要改变专业、科学的政策和资金支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信