Supporting Nurse Leaders to Recognize and Intervene in Team Members' Suicidality.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kristina E James, Julia Rogers, Rachael Accardi, Gokarna Aryal, Patti Ludwig-Beymer, Judy E Davidson
{"title":"Supporting Nurse Leaders to Recognize and Intervene in Team Members' Suicidality.","authors":"Kristina E James, Julia Rogers, Rachael Accardi, Gokarna Aryal, Patti Ludwig-Beymer, Judy E Davidson","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses and healthcare support staff have a higher suicide risk than the public. This elevated risk calls for increased efforts to support mental health. Additionally, nursing leaders' education on employee-specific suicide prevention is lacking.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An evidence-based project was implemented using the PICO question: Among nurse leaders at an academic healthcare system in California, does the provision of an educational program using role-playing practice and the creation of a suicide prevention toolkit versus no standard education or training improve self-efficacy and knowledge on how to take action with a team member who is suspected of being suicidal or voicing suicidal ideation?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Education sessions were planned based on the literature, with surveys collected preintervention, immediately posteducation, and 1-month postintervention to assess suicide prevention self-efficacy and knowledge. Knowledge was measured using a researcher-constructed questionnaire validated by six suicide prevention experts. The General Self-Efficacy Scale (range: 10-40) was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants attended one of 11 scheduled remote-learning sessions. Mean self-efficacy significantly improved (pre: 31.3 [n = 46, min: 18, max: 40]; immediate post: 33.49 [n = 37, min: 24, max: 40]; 1-month post: 33.77 [n = 31, min: 28, max: 40]) (X<sup>2</sup> = 8.0184, df = 2, p = 0.01815). The proportion of incorrect knowledge questions was significantly lower postintervention (mean pre: 24.5%, immediate post: 11.5%, 1-month post: 10.7%, X<sup>2</sup> = 23.195, df = 2, p = 0.000001). All participants (100%, n = 55) recommended the program. Leaders reported feeling better prepared to support suicidal employees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Project results demonstrate the need to provide suicide prevention training for leaders. The authors recommend requiring training/return demonstration competency as a component of new leaders' onboarding. This program can easily be modified for nurses from prelicensure through senior leadership.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Suicide rates in healthcare members are higher than those of the general population. Suicide prevention programs can help nursing leaders feel better prepared to support and connect at-risk healthcare workers with resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nurses and healthcare support staff have a higher suicide risk than the public. This elevated risk calls for increased efforts to support mental health. Additionally, nursing leaders' education on employee-specific suicide prevention is lacking.

Design: An evidence-based project was implemented using the PICO question: Among nurse leaders at an academic healthcare system in California, does the provision of an educational program using role-playing practice and the creation of a suicide prevention toolkit versus no standard education or training improve self-efficacy and knowledge on how to take action with a team member who is suspected of being suicidal or voicing suicidal ideation?

Methods: Education sessions were planned based on the literature, with surveys collected preintervention, immediately posteducation, and 1-month postintervention to assess suicide prevention self-efficacy and knowledge. Knowledge was measured using a researcher-constructed questionnaire validated by six suicide prevention experts. The General Self-Efficacy Scale (range: 10-40) was used.

Results: Sixty participants attended one of 11 scheduled remote-learning sessions. Mean self-efficacy significantly improved (pre: 31.3 [n = 46, min: 18, max: 40]; immediate post: 33.49 [n = 37, min: 24, max: 40]; 1-month post: 33.77 [n = 31, min: 28, max: 40]) (X2 = 8.0184, df = 2, p = 0.01815). The proportion of incorrect knowledge questions was significantly lower postintervention (mean pre: 24.5%, immediate post: 11.5%, 1-month post: 10.7%, X2 = 23.195, df = 2, p = 0.000001). All participants (100%, n = 55) recommended the program. Leaders reported feeling better prepared to support suicidal employees.

Conclusion: Project results demonstrate the need to provide suicide prevention training for leaders. The authors recommend requiring training/return demonstration competency as a component of new leaders' onboarding. This program can easily be modified for nurses from prelicensure through senior leadership.

Clinical relevance: Suicide rates in healthcare members are higher than those of the general population. Suicide prevention programs can help nursing leaders feel better prepared to support and connect at-risk healthcare workers with resources.

支持护士长认识和干预团队成员的自杀倾向。
导言:护士和卫生保健支持人员比公众有更高的自杀风险。这种风险的增加要求加大对精神卫生的支持力度。此外,护理领导缺乏针对员工的自杀预防教育。设计:一个基于证据的项目使用PICO问题来实施:在加利福尼亚的一个学术医疗保健系统的护士领导中,提供一个使用角色扮演实践的教育项目和创建自杀预防工具包,与没有标准的教育或培训相比,是否提高了自我效能感和如何对怀疑有自杀倾向或表达自杀想法的团队成员采取行动的知识?方法:根据文献规划教育课程,在干预前、干预后立即和干预后1个月收集问卷,评估自杀预防自我效能感和知识。知识是通过研究人员构建的问卷来测量的,该问卷由六名自杀预防专家验证。采用一般自我效能量表(范围:10-40)。结果:60名参与者参加了11次预定的远程学习会议之一。平均自我效能显著提高(pre: 31.3 [n = 46, min: 18, max: 40];即时发帖:33.49 [n = 37, min: 24, max: 40];个月后:33.77 (n = 31日分钟:28日,马克斯:40))(X2 = 8.0184, df = 2, p = 0.01815)。干预后知识题错误率显著降低(干预前平均24.5%,干预后立即平均11.5%,干预后1个月平均10.7%,X2 = 23.195, df = 2, p = 0.000001)。所有参与者(100%,n = 55)都推荐了该方案。领导们报告说,他们在支持有自杀倾向的员工方面做了更好的准备。结论:项目结果表明有必要为领导提供自杀预防培训。作者建议将培训/回报展示能力作为新领导者入职的一个组成部分。这个程序可以很容易地修改护士从执照预审到高级领导。临床相关性:医疗保健人员的自杀率高于一般人群。自杀预防计划可以帮助护理领导更好地准备支持和连接有风险的医护人员与资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信