Comparison of the effectiveness of kinesiologic taping and high intensity laser therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Hasan Yüksel, Banu Aydeniz, Arda Can Kasap, Haticetul Esra Gerze, Işıl Üstün, Sibel Çağlar, Meltem Vural
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of kinesiologic taping and high intensity laser therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hasan Yüksel, Banu Aydeniz, Arda Can Kasap, Haticetul Esra Gerze, Işıl Üstün, Sibel Çağlar, Meltem Vural","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral elbow tendinopathy is a common condition that causes pain and functional impairments, limiting daily activities.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy, kinesio taping, and therapeutic exercises in terms of pain, function, disability, and muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five patients were randomly assigned into three groups. The first group received high-intensity laser therapy + therapeutic exercises, the second group received kinesio taping + therapeutic exercises, and the third group received therapeutic exercises alone. Evaluations were performed before treatment (PreT), immediately after treatment (PostT), and 4 weeks after treatment (PostT-4). Outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH), the Patient-based Lateral Epicondylitis Evaluation (PRTEE), and grip strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping showed significant improvements in PRTEE scores at PostT and PostT-4. Kinesio taping was superior to therapeutic exercises but showed no difference compared to high-intensity laser therapy. All groups showed significant improvements in Q-DASH scores at PostT-4, with high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping being more effective than therapeutic exercises. No significant differences were found between the groups for VAS and grip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic exercises alone is effective in treating lateral elbow tendinopathy, while high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping provide additional benefits in improving function and reducing disability. There was no superiority between high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping, but both were more beneficial than therapeutic exercises alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.01.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy is a common condition that causes pain and functional impairments, limiting daily activities.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy, kinesio taping, and therapeutic exercises in terms of pain, function, disability, and muscle strength.

Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Fifty-five patients were randomly assigned into three groups. The first group received high-intensity laser therapy + therapeutic exercises, the second group received kinesio taping + therapeutic exercises, and the third group received therapeutic exercises alone. Evaluations were performed before treatment (PreT), immediately after treatment (PostT), and 4 weeks after treatment (PostT-4). Outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH), the Patient-based Lateral Epicondylitis Evaluation (PRTEE), and grip strength.

Results: Both high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping showed significant improvements in PRTEE scores at PostT and PostT-4. Kinesio taping was superior to therapeutic exercises but showed no difference compared to high-intensity laser therapy. All groups showed significant improvements in Q-DASH scores at PostT-4, with high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping being more effective than therapeutic exercises. No significant differences were found between the groups for VAS and grip strength.

Conclusions: Therapeutic exercises alone is effective in treating lateral elbow tendinopathy, while high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping provide additional benefits in improving function and reducing disability. There was no superiority between high-intensity laser therapy and kinesio taping, but both were more beneficial than therapeutic exercises alone.

运动学胶带与高强度激光治疗肘关节外侧肌腱病变的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:肘关节外侧肌腱病变是一种常见疾病,可引起疼痛和功能障碍,限制日常活动。目的:本研究旨在比较高强度激光治疗、运动贴敷和治疗性锻炼在疼痛、功能、残疾和肌肉力量方面的疗效。研究设计:前瞻性随机对照试验。方法:55例患者随机分为3组。第一组采用高强度激光治疗+治疗性运动,第二组采用运动贴敷+治疗性运动,第三组单独采用治疗性运动。分别在治疗前(PreT)、治疗后(PostT)和治疗后4周(post4)进行评估。结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(Q-DASH)、基于患者的外上髁炎评估(PRTEE)和握力进行测量。结果:高强度激光治疗和运动贴敷均能显著改善post - t和post -4的PRTEE评分。肌内效贴敷优于治疗性运动,但与高强度激光治疗相比没有差异。所有组在4后的Q-DASH评分都有显著改善,高强度激光治疗和运动贴比治疗性锻炼更有效。VAS评分和握力评分组间无显著差异。结论:治疗性运动是治疗外侧肘关节病变的有效方法,而高强度激光治疗和运动贴敷在改善功能和减少残疾方面提供了额外的好处。高强度激光治疗和运动贴之间没有优势,但两者都比单独的治疗性锻炼更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信