Barbara Prediger, Louis Traxel, Nadja Könsgen, Niklas Schäfer, Dawid Pieper
{"title":"[Waiting times for a second opinion appointment for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy - a study of simulated patients].","authors":"Barbara Prediger, Louis Traxel, Nadja Könsgen, Niklas Schäfer, Dawid Pieper","doi":"10.1055/a-2495-8494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Since December 2018, statutory health insured people with indication for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy have the right to obtain a second opinion (SO) according to the SO directive. It is a legal requirement that the physician providing the indication has to inform the patient about his/her right to obtain an SO. This has to be done usually at least 10 days before the procedure, but in any case in time for the patient to make a well-considered decision about seeking an SO. The aim was to assess waiting times for appointments with physicians to obtain an SO. In our study of simulated patients, all practices with physicians of the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe providing SO (n=53 medical practices) were contacted via phone up to three times between January and February 2022. Using a standardized and piloted protocol, it was stated that there was an indication for a tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy and that the patient wanted to make an appointment for an SO. It was assessed how long the waiting time for an appointment would be, as well as whether it would be possible to obtain the appointment via video consultation and whether any further questions or details were provided during this telephone call (e. g. reference to documents to be brought along). Overall, 94.4% (50/53) of the medical practices could be reached. A great majority of them (92% (46/50)) offered an appointment in contrast to three medical practices that offered open consultation hours. The remaining practice offered both ways to obtain an SO. On average, a waiting time of 8.1 (Standard deviation 5.4) working days was needed for an appointment in the morning and 10.1 (standard deviation 5.9) for an appointment in the afternoon. The availability of the medical practices was high. In 31% of cases, it took longer than 10 days to obtain the SO. Nevertheless, the overall waiting times were short. In principle, patients should be provided with a timely appointment for an SO, which is possible within the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe. The SO is very rarely offered via video consultation. However, this could possibly increase rural care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2495-8494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since December 2018, statutory health insured people with indication for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy have the right to obtain a second opinion (SO) according to the SO directive. It is a legal requirement that the physician providing the indication has to inform the patient about his/her right to obtain an SO. This has to be done usually at least 10 days before the procedure, but in any case in time for the patient to make a well-considered decision about seeking an SO. The aim was to assess waiting times for appointments with physicians to obtain an SO. In our study of simulated patients, all practices with physicians of the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe providing SO (n=53 medical practices) were contacted via phone up to three times between January and February 2022. Using a standardized and piloted protocol, it was stated that there was an indication for a tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy and that the patient wanted to make an appointment for an SO. It was assessed how long the waiting time for an appointment would be, as well as whether it would be possible to obtain the appointment via video consultation and whether any further questions or details were provided during this telephone call (e. g. reference to documents to be brought along). Overall, 94.4% (50/53) of the medical practices could be reached. A great majority of them (92% (46/50)) offered an appointment in contrast to three medical practices that offered open consultation hours. The remaining practice offered both ways to obtain an SO. On average, a waiting time of 8.1 (Standard deviation 5.4) working days was needed for an appointment in the morning and 10.1 (standard deviation 5.9) for an appointment in the afternoon. The availability of the medical practices was high. In 31% of cases, it took longer than 10 days to obtain the SO. Nevertheless, the overall waiting times were short. In principle, patients should be provided with a timely appointment for an SO, which is possible within the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe. The SO is very rarely offered via video consultation. However, this could possibly increase rural care.
期刊介绍:
The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.