[Waiting times for a second opinion appointment for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy - a study of simulated patients].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Barbara Prediger, Louis Traxel, Nadja Könsgen, Niklas Schäfer, Dawid Pieper
{"title":"[Waiting times for a second opinion appointment for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy - a study of simulated patients].","authors":"Barbara Prediger, Louis Traxel, Nadja Könsgen, Niklas Schäfer, Dawid Pieper","doi":"10.1055/a-2495-8494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>  Since December 2018, statutory health insured people with indication for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy have the right to obtain a second opinion (SO) according to the SO directive. It is a legal requirement that the physician providing the indication has to inform the patient about his/her right to obtain an SO. This has to be done usually at least 10 days before the procedure, but in any case in time for the patient to make a well-considered decision about seeking an SO. The aim was to assess waiting times for appointments with physicians to obtain an SO.  In our study of simulated patients, all practices with physicians of the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe providing SO (n=53 medical practices) were contacted via phone up to three times between January and February 2022. Using a standardized and piloted protocol, it was stated that there was an indication for a tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy and that the patient wanted to make an appointment for an SO. It was assessed how long the waiting time for an appointment would be, as well as whether it would be possible to obtain the appointment via video consultation and whether any further questions or details were provided during this telephone call (e. g. reference to documents to be brought along).  Overall, 94.4% (50/53) of the medical practices could be reached. A great majority of them (92% (46/50)) offered an appointment in contrast to three medical practices that offered open consultation hours. The remaining practice offered both ways to obtain an SO. On average, a waiting time of 8.1 (Standard deviation 5.4) working days was needed for an appointment in the morning and 10.1 (standard deviation 5.9) for an appointment in the afternoon. The availability of the medical practices was high. In 31% of cases, it took longer than 10 days to obtain the SO. Nevertheless, the overall waiting times were short.  In principle, patients should be provided with a timely appointment for an SO, which is possible within the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe. The SO is very rarely offered via video consultation. However, this could possibly increase rural care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2495-8494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  Since December 2018, statutory health insured people with indication for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy have the right to obtain a second opinion (SO) according to the SO directive. It is a legal requirement that the physician providing the indication has to inform the patient about his/her right to obtain an SO. This has to be done usually at least 10 days before the procedure, but in any case in time for the patient to make a well-considered decision about seeking an SO. The aim was to assess waiting times for appointments with physicians to obtain an SO.  In our study of simulated patients, all practices with physicians of the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe providing SO (n=53 medical practices) were contacted via phone up to three times between January and February 2022. Using a standardized and piloted protocol, it was stated that there was an indication for a tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy and that the patient wanted to make an appointment for an SO. It was assessed how long the waiting time for an appointment would be, as well as whether it would be possible to obtain the appointment via video consultation and whether any further questions or details were provided during this telephone call (e. g. reference to documents to be brought along).  Overall, 94.4% (50/53) of the medical practices could be reached. A great majority of them (92% (46/50)) offered an appointment in contrast to three medical practices that offered open consultation hours. The remaining practice offered both ways to obtain an SO. On average, a waiting time of 8.1 (Standard deviation 5.4) working days was needed for an appointment in the morning and 10.1 (standard deviation 5.9) for an appointment in the afternoon. The availability of the medical practices was high. In 31% of cases, it took longer than 10 days to obtain the SO. Nevertheless, the overall waiting times were short.  In principle, patients should be provided with a timely appointment for an SO, which is possible within the Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of North Rhine and Westphalia-Lippe. The SO is very rarely offered via video consultation. However, this could possibly increase rural care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信