A study of differences in absorbed dose estimates by images used in dosimetry of Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yui Masaki, Yasuo Yamashita, Takuro Isoda, Toyoyuki Kato, Shingo Baba
{"title":"A study of differences in absorbed dose estimates by images used in dosimetry of Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy.","authors":"Yui Masaki, Yasuo Yamashita, Takuro Isoda, Toyoyuki Kato, Shingo Baba","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00898-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Lu-177-labeled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, dosimetry has recently gained importance for assessing side effects and treatment responses. However, no standard method has been established yet. In this retrospective study, we compared the kidney-absorbed doses of 24 treatments with Lu-177-DOTATATE using three methods: a planar method using only planar images, a hybrid method using planar and SPECT/CT images, and a SPECT/CT method using only SPECT/CT images. In the Planar method, the ROI was defined from 2D whole-body planar images and calculated using the MIRD method. In the Hybrid method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the VOIs were placed in the 2D planar image as ROIs, which were calculated using the MIRD method. For the SPECT/CT method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the mean absorbed dose was estimated on a voxel basis. The absorbed dose estimated with the Planar method (15.2 ± 5.81 Gy) was significantly higher than the estimates with the other two methods (Hybrid: 2.93 ± 1.33 Gy, SPECT/CT: 3.81 ± 0.93 Gy) (p < 0.05). The Hybrid and SPECT/CT methods exhibited the strongest correlation. The Planar method demonstrated the highest variability in estimated values. The use of 2D planar images alone tended to overestimate the absorbed dose compared to the other methods, depending on the definition of the ROIs and the characteristics of the analysis software. This suggests that a combined approach using SPECT/CT and planar images is preferable for dosimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00898-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Lu-177-labeled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, dosimetry has recently gained importance for assessing side effects and treatment responses. However, no standard method has been established yet. In this retrospective study, we compared the kidney-absorbed doses of 24 treatments with Lu-177-DOTATATE using three methods: a planar method using only planar images, a hybrid method using planar and SPECT/CT images, and a SPECT/CT method using only SPECT/CT images. In the Planar method, the ROI was defined from 2D whole-body planar images and calculated using the MIRD method. In the Hybrid method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the VOIs were placed in the 2D planar image as ROIs, which were calculated using the MIRD method. For the SPECT/CT method, the VOI was defined from CT images and the mean absorbed dose was estimated on a voxel basis. The absorbed dose estimated with the Planar method (15.2 ± 5.81 Gy) was significantly higher than the estimates with the other two methods (Hybrid: 2.93 ± 1.33 Gy, SPECT/CT: 3.81 ± 0.93 Gy) (p < 0.05). The Hybrid and SPECT/CT methods exhibited the strongest correlation. The Planar method demonstrated the highest variability in estimated values. The use of 2D planar images alone tended to overestimate the absorbed dose compared to the other methods, depending on the definition of the ROIs and the characteristics of the analysis software. This suggests that a combined approach using SPECT/CT and planar images is preferable for dosimetry.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信