Madison S Mach, Hayley Ericksen, Erin Lally, Jennifer E Earl-Boehm
{"title":"Foot-Placed Inertial Measurement Units Are Valid Against Shank-Placed Units When Measuring Temporospatial Running Variables.","authors":"Madison S Mach, Hayley Ericksen, Erin Lally, Jennifer E Earl-Boehm","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Running is a popular form of physical activity but can increase an individual's lower-extremity injury risk. Running gait analysis via inertial measurement units (IMUs) is a method for collecting important gait data that is related to developing lower-extremity injuries, such as increased load from low step rate (SR), and long stride length (SL). IMU data can be derived from both foot- and shank-placed IMUs, but foot-placed sensors (RunScribe IMUs) need validation against shank-placed sensors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine criterion validity of RunScribe foot-placed IMUs against MyoMotion shank-placed IMU for SR and SL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>cross-sectional laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine participants (5 males, 4 females; age: 28.33 [5.78]; height: 1.75 [0.11]; mass: 74.06 [16.24]) volunteered for our study. Following a 5-minute warm-up, participants ran on a treadmill for 5 minutes at a self-selected speed. After ∼2.5 minutes, MyoMotion data were collected for 10 seconds. The RunScribe IMUs collected data throughout the full duration of the run. Criterion validity of SR and SL between the foot- and shank-placed IMUs was determined using bivariate Pearson correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (3,1), and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A very strong correlation for SR (r = .90, N = 9, P ≤ .001), and a strong correlation for SL (r = .80, N = 9, P < .001) were found between the foot and shank-placed IMUs. Excellent reliability was found for SR (intraclass correlation coefficient = .91, P ≤ .001, 95% CI, .639-.978), and good reliability was found for SL (intraclass correlation coefficient = .800, P = .003, 95% CI, .340-.951) between the foot and shank-placed IMUs. The mean difference of SR and SL was -2.111 and -0.142, respectively, indicating good agreement between the foot and shank-placed IMUs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Foot-placed RunScribe IMUs are a valid alternative for measuring SR and SL compared with shank-placed IMUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Running is a popular form of physical activity but can increase an individual's lower-extremity injury risk. Running gait analysis via inertial measurement units (IMUs) is a method for collecting important gait data that is related to developing lower-extremity injuries, such as increased load from low step rate (SR), and long stride length (SL). IMU data can be derived from both foot- and shank-placed IMUs, but foot-placed sensors (RunScribe IMUs) need validation against shank-placed sensors.
Purpose: Determine criterion validity of RunScribe foot-placed IMUs against MyoMotion shank-placed IMU for SR and SL.
Design: cross-sectional laboratory study.
Methods: Nine participants (5 males, 4 females; age: 28.33 [5.78]; height: 1.75 [0.11]; mass: 74.06 [16.24]) volunteered for our study. Following a 5-minute warm-up, participants ran on a treadmill for 5 minutes at a self-selected speed. After ∼2.5 minutes, MyoMotion data were collected for 10 seconds. The RunScribe IMUs collected data throughout the full duration of the run. Criterion validity of SR and SL between the foot- and shank-placed IMUs was determined using bivariate Pearson correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (3,1), and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement analysis.
Results: A very strong correlation for SR (r = .90, N = 9, P ≤ .001), and a strong correlation for SL (r = .80, N = 9, P < .001) were found between the foot and shank-placed IMUs. Excellent reliability was found for SR (intraclass correlation coefficient = .91, P ≤ .001, 95% CI, .639-.978), and good reliability was found for SL (intraclass correlation coefficient = .800, P = .003, 95% CI, .340-.951) between the foot and shank-placed IMUs. The mean difference of SR and SL was -2.111 and -0.142, respectively, indicating good agreement between the foot and shank-placed IMUs.
Conclusions: Foot-placed RunScribe IMUs are a valid alternative for measuring SR and SL compared with shank-placed IMUs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.