Effects of Landing Impacts and Running on Balance Error Scoring System Performance.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Barry A Munkasy, Thomas A Buckley
{"title":"Effects of Landing Impacts and Running on Balance Error Scoring System Performance.","authors":"Barry A Munkasy, Thomas A Buckley","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is the most commonly used balance test during concussion assessment; however, the test has known limitations related to fatigue. Jumping and landing along with running are common athletic activities that adversely affect postural control. However, the effect of neither subexertional running nor jumping and landing tasks on the BESS is known. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a brief exercise bout of running or jumping on BESS performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We recruited 52 recreationally active participants who were divided into 3 groups: (1) Drop Jump (Landing), Treadmill Running (Run), and Control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants performed a preintervention BESS test and were then randomly assigned to a group. The jumping group performed 10 drop jumps from a 50 cm box, 30 seconds between trials, the running group performed a 3-minute treadmill run, and the control group sat quietly for 5 minutes. All participants then completed a second BESS test. The primary analysis was a 2 (time) by 3 (group) repeated-measure analysis of variance with sex as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction (F = 7.396, P = .002). On post hoc, there was a significant improvement (lower) score in the Control group (PRE: 13.9 [4.5]; POST: 10.5 [2.9]; P = .019, d = 0.89) but no significant differences in either the running (P = .579) or landing (P = .849) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A relatively brief exercise intervention resulted in participants failing to improve a subsequent BESS assessment, whereas control participants who rested for 5 minutes committed fewer (3.4) errors. These results suggest that sports health care providers should recognize that even low- to moderate-intensity brief exercise can result in a failure to improve with repeat BESS administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is the most commonly used balance test during concussion assessment; however, the test has known limitations related to fatigue. Jumping and landing along with running are common athletic activities that adversely affect postural control. However, the effect of neither subexertional running nor jumping and landing tasks on the BESS is known. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a brief exercise bout of running or jumping on BESS performance.

Design: We recruited 52 recreationally active participants who were divided into 3 groups: (1) Drop Jump (Landing), Treadmill Running (Run), and Control.

Methods: All participants performed a preintervention BESS test and were then randomly assigned to a group. The jumping group performed 10 drop jumps from a 50 cm box, 30 seconds between trials, the running group performed a 3-minute treadmill run, and the control group sat quietly for 5 minutes. All participants then completed a second BESS test. The primary analysis was a 2 (time) by 3 (group) repeated-measure analysis of variance with sex as a covariate.

Results: There was a significant interaction (F = 7.396, P = .002). On post hoc, there was a significant improvement (lower) score in the Control group (PRE: 13.9 [4.5]; POST: 10.5 [2.9]; P = .019, d = 0.89) but no significant differences in either the running (P = .579) or landing (P = .849) groups.

Conclusions: A relatively brief exercise intervention resulted in participants failing to improve a subsequent BESS assessment, whereas control participants who rested for 5 minutes committed fewer (3.4) errors. These results suggest that sports health care providers should recognize that even low- to moderate-intensity brief exercise can result in a failure to improve with repeat BESS administration.

着陆冲击和跑步对平衡误差评分系统性能的影响。
背景:平衡误差评分系统(BESS)是脑震荡评估中最常用的平衡测试;然而,该测试在疲劳方面存在已知的局限性。跳跃和着陆以及跑步是常见的运动,会对姿势控制产生不利影响。然而,无论是次活动的跑步还是跳跃和着陆任务对BESS的影响都是未知的。因此,本研究的目的是探讨短暂的跑步或跳跃运动对BESS表现的影响。设计:我们招募了52名从事娱乐活动的参与者,他们被分为3组:(1)跳高(落地)、跑步机(跑)和对照组。方法:所有参与者进行干预前BESS测试,然后随机分配到一组。跳远组从一个50厘米的箱子上跳10次,每组间隔30秒,跑步组在跑步机上跑3分钟,对照组静静地坐5分钟。然后,所有参与者都完成了第二次BESS测试。主要分析是2(时间)× 3(组)重复测量方差分析,以性别为协变量。结果:存在显著交互作用(F = 7.396, P = 0.002)。事后,对照组有显著改善(较低)得分(PRE: 13.9 [4.5];Post: 10.5 [2.9];P = 0.019, d = 0.89),但在跑步组(P = 0.579)和着陆组(P = 0.849)均无显著差异。结论:相对短暂的运动干预导致参与者未能改善随后的BESS评估,而休息5分钟的对照组参与者犯的错误更少(3.4)。这些结果表明,运动卫生保健提供者应该认识到,即使是低到中等强度的短暂运动也可能导致重复BESS管理无法改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信