[Status of Robotics in Living Donor Liver and Kidney Transplantation - Review of the Literature and Results of a Survey among German Transplant Centres].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2538-8802
Cornelius J van Beekum, Ulrich Zwirner, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Gerrit Grannas, Jessica Singh, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Philipp Felgendreff, Markus Quante
{"title":"[Status of Robotics in Living Donor Liver and Kidney Transplantation - Review of the Literature and Results of a Survey among German Transplant Centres].","authors":"Cornelius J van Beekum, Ulrich Zwirner, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Gerrit Grannas, Jessica Singh, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Philipp Felgendreff, Markus Quante","doi":"10.1055/a-2538-8802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advantages of minimally invasive surgical techniques are undisputed. With the introduction of robotic assistance systems, classic laparoscopy has been further developed and is now also being utilized in transplant surgery, which was previously mainly characterised by open surgical procedures, particularly in living donor liver and kidney donations. In order to assess the current implementation status of robotic assistance systems in transplant surgery, international studies in this field were summarized and correlated with a national survey on the use of robotic assistance systems in living donation.First, a narrative summary of the MEDLINE-listed publications on robotic living kidney and liver donation was carried out. In addition, an online survey was conducted among German transplant centres with ten questions on the utilization of robotic techniques in Germany.Retrospective cohort studies at a small number of transplant centres worldwide report particular advantages of robotics, especially regarding blood loss, patient comfort and length of hospital stay. One-third of German transplant centres already perform living kidney donations with robotic assistance, and one-fifth of centres even use this technique in over 90% of cases. In contrast, living liver donations are only performed in one German transplant centre using robotic assistance for left lateral liver resection of the donor.In the context of living donation, advocates of robotics emphasise technical advantages, greater patient comfort and a steeper learning curve. A persistent and significant point of criticism regarding robotic surgical techniques remains the prolonged warm ischemia time, especially during learning curves. The survey results presented here demonstrate that there is still a substantial need for discussion on this current topic. However, there is a lack of prospective randomised controlled studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23956,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","volume":" ","pages":"230-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2538-8802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advantages of minimally invasive surgical techniques are undisputed. With the introduction of robotic assistance systems, classic laparoscopy has been further developed and is now also being utilized in transplant surgery, which was previously mainly characterised by open surgical procedures, particularly in living donor liver and kidney donations. In order to assess the current implementation status of robotic assistance systems in transplant surgery, international studies in this field were summarized and correlated with a national survey on the use of robotic assistance systems in living donation.First, a narrative summary of the MEDLINE-listed publications on robotic living kidney and liver donation was carried out. In addition, an online survey was conducted among German transplant centres with ten questions on the utilization of robotic techniques in Germany.Retrospective cohort studies at a small number of transplant centres worldwide report particular advantages of robotics, especially regarding blood loss, patient comfort and length of hospital stay. One-third of German transplant centres already perform living kidney donations with robotic assistance, and one-fifth of centres even use this technique in over 90% of cases. In contrast, living liver donations are only performed in one German transplant centre using robotic assistance for left lateral liver resection of the donor.In the context of living donation, advocates of robotics emphasise technical advantages, greater patient comfort and a steeper learning curve. A persistent and significant point of criticism regarding robotic surgical techniques remains the prolonged warm ischemia time, especially during learning curves. The survey results presented here demonstrate that there is still a substantial need for discussion on this current topic. However, there is a lack of prospective randomised controlled studies.

[机器人技术在活体供体肝脏和肾脏移植中的地位-文献综述和德国移植中心调查结果]。
微创手术技术的优势是无可争议的。随着机器人辅助系统的引入,传统的腹腔镜手术得到了进一步的发展,现在也被用于移植手术,这在以前主要以开放手术为特征,特别是在活体肝脏和肾脏捐赠中。为了评估机器人辅助系统在移植手术中的实施现状,总结了该领域的国际研究,并与一项关于机器人辅助系统在活体捐赠中的使用的国家调查相关联。首先,对medline列出的关于机器人活体肾脏和肝脏捐赠的出版物进行了叙述性总结。此外,在德国的移植中心进行了一项在线调查,提出了十个关于德国使用机器人技术的问题。在全球少数移植中心进行的回顾性队列研究报告了机器人技术的特殊优势,特别是在失血、患者舒适度和住院时间方面。三分之一的德国移植中心已经在机器人协助下进行活体肾脏捐赠,五分之一的中心甚至在90%以上的病例中使用了这项技术。相比之下,活体肝脏捐献仅在德国的一个移植中心进行,使用机器人辅助供体左侧肝脏切除。在活体捐赠的背景下,机器人技术的支持者强调技术优势,更大的患者舒适度和更陡峭的学习曲线。关于机器人手术技术的一个持续和重要的批评点仍然是延长的热缺血时间,特别是在学习曲线期间。这里提出的调查结果表明,仍有很大的需要讨论这个当前的话题。然而,缺乏前瞻性随机对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Forschung und Praxis Das Zentralblatt für Chirurgie – alle Neuigkeiten aus der Allgemeinen, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信