Short-term outcomes and the learning curve for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the ArtiSential: a multicenter pooled analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Seijong Kim, Jaeim Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Dong Hwan Bae, Byung Soh Min, Chang Hyun Kim, Jung Wook Huh
{"title":"Short-term outcomes and the learning curve for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the ArtiSential: a multicenter pooled analysis.","authors":"Seijong Kim, Jaeim Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Dong Hwan Bae, Byung Soh Min, Chang Hyun Kim, Jung Wook Huh","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11670-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer has demonstrated significant advantages over traditional methods, but laparoscopic procedures remain technically challenging. ArtiSential is an articulated handheld laparoscopic system designed to offer greater maneuverability similar to robotic surgery, while addressing cost constraints. However, its clinical efficacy in right hemicolectomy (RHC) for right-sided colon cancer remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted from January 2021 to October 2022, enrolling 511 patients who underwent laparoscopic RHC for right-sided colon cancer. Of these, 167 patients underwent ArtiSential-assisted RHC, while 344 underwent conventional RHC. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables. Additionally, we employed cumulative sum analysis to evaluate the learning curve associated with ArtiSential use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, each group consisted of 165 patients, with no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics. The median operation time was 148 min for both procedures (p = 0.423). No significant differences were observed in complication rates, including intraoperative blood loss, open conversion, postoperative ileus, anastomotic leakage, or wound complications between ArtiSential-assisted RHC and conventional RHC. Moreover, the total expenses were not different between the groups. Cumulative sum analysis indicated that surgeons reached proficiency with ArtiSential after an average of 19 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ArtiSential-assisted RHC proves to be a safe and feasible option, yielding comparable outcomes to conventional RHC with no significant differences in intraoperative or postoperative metrics. Surgeons can achieve proficiency with ArtiSential after performing an average of 19 cases. These findings suggest that ArtiSential could be a valuable addition to the minimally invasive surgical toolkit for right-sided colon cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2931-2937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11670-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer has demonstrated significant advantages over traditional methods, but laparoscopic procedures remain technically challenging. ArtiSential is an articulated handheld laparoscopic system designed to offer greater maneuverability similar to robotic surgery, while addressing cost constraints. However, its clinical efficacy in right hemicolectomy (RHC) for right-sided colon cancer remains underexplored.

Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted from January 2021 to October 2022, enrolling 511 patients who underwent laparoscopic RHC for right-sided colon cancer. Of these, 167 patients underwent ArtiSential-assisted RHC, while 344 underwent conventional RHC. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables. Additionally, we employed cumulative sum analysis to evaluate the learning curve associated with ArtiSential use.

Results: After PSM, each group consisted of 165 patients, with no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics. The median operation time was 148 min for both procedures (p = 0.423). No significant differences were observed in complication rates, including intraoperative blood loss, open conversion, postoperative ileus, anastomotic leakage, or wound complications between ArtiSential-assisted RHC and conventional RHC. Moreover, the total expenses were not different between the groups. Cumulative sum analysis indicated that surgeons reached proficiency with ArtiSential after an average of 19 cases.

Conclusion: ArtiSential-assisted RHC proves to be a safe and feasible option, yielding comparable outcomes to conventional RHC with no significant differences in intraoperative or postoperative metrics. Surgeons can achieve proficiency with ArtiSential after performing an average of 19 cases. These findings suggest that ArtiSential could be a valuable addition to the minimally invasive surgical toolkit for right-sided colon cancer treatment.

使用 ArtiSential 进行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的短期疗效和学习曲线:多中心汇总分析。
背景:微创结直肠癌手术与传统方法相比具有显著优势,但腹腔镜手术在技术上仍然具有挑战性。artiential是一种铰接式手持腹腔镜系统,旨在提供类似机器人手术的更大机动性,同时解决成本限制问题。然而,其在右半结肠切除术(RHC)治疗右侧结肠癌的临床疗效尚不明确。方法:从2021年1月至2022年10月进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,纳入了511例接受腹腔镜RHC治疗右侧结肠癌的患者。其中167例患者接受了人工辅助RHC, 344例接受了常规RHC。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于平衡基线变量。此外,我们采用累积和分析来评估与艺术使用相关的学习曲线。结果:PSM后,各组165例患者,基线临床特征无显著差异。两种手术的中位手术时间均为148 min (p = 0.423)。手术辅助RHC与常规RHC的并发症发生率无显著差异,包括术中出血量、开放转换、术后肠梗阻、吻合口漏或伤口并发症。此外,两组之间的总费用没有差异。累积和分析表明,平均19例手术后,外科医生熟练掌握了ArtiSential。结论:人工辅助RHC被证明是一种安全可行的选择,其结果与传统RHC相当,术中或术后指标无显著差异。在平均完成19例手术后,外科医生可以熟练地进行手术。这些发现表明,artiential可能是对右侧结肠癌治疗的微创手术工具包的一个有价值的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信