Impacts of red blood cell suspension storage on pediatric outcomes: pediatric medicine and pediatric surgery.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-23 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-433
Mingwei Yin, Guannan Bai, Yangyang Zhong, Jihua Ma, Dandan Tian, Xuying Guo, Chao Zhou, Baohai Chen, Xuejun Chen, Zhigang Gao
{"title":"Impacts of red blood cell suspension storage on pediatric outcomes: pediatric medicine and pediatric surgery.","authors":"Mingwei Yin, Guannan Bai, Yangyang Zhong, Jihua Ma, Dandan Tian, Xuying Guo, Chao Zhou, Baohai Chen, Xuejun Chen, Zhigang Gao","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impacts of red blood cell (RBC) suspension storage on outcomes in pediatric patients receiving RBC transfusions remains uncertain. Therefore, our objective is to examine the association between RBC storage duration and outcomes in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 222 patients admitted to medical and surgical departments at our center in 2021. Primary outcomes assessed were 28-day mortality and length of hospital stays, while secondary outcomes included transfusion-related complications, total volume of RBC transfusions, number of RBC transfusions, and interval between RBC transfusions. Patients were categorized into the fresh group (≤10 days) and the old group (≥21 days) based on RBC storage time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following RBC transfusions, there was a significant improvement in post-transfusion hemoglobin, RBC counts, and hematocrit in both internal medicine and surgery departments. Among medical patients, the fresh group exhibited a shorter hospital stays compared to the old group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.677; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.476 to 0.961; P=0.03]; however, no significant difference was observed among surgical patients. Within surgical patients, the fresh group showed longer interval between RBC transfusions (HR =2.235; 95% CI: 1.145 to 4.363; P=0.02) and required fewer number of RBC transfusions (P=0.04). No significant differences were found in hemoglobin, RBC counts, hematocrit, K<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, lactate (Lac), and pH after RBC transfusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RBC storage was not associated with 28-day mortality in medical and surgical pediatric patients. Fresh RBC transfusions were found to reduce the length of hospital stays by 32.3% in medical patients, extend the interval between RBC transfusions by 1.235 times and decrease the number of RBC transfusions in surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"14 2","pages":"187-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impacts of red blood cell (RBC) suspension storage on outcomes in pediatric patients receiving RBC transfusions remains uncertain. Therefore, our objective is to examine the association between RBC storage duration and outcomes in pediatric patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 222 patients admitted to medical and surgical departments at our center in 2021. Primary outcomes assessed were 28-day mortality and length of hospital stays, while secondary outcomes included transfusion-related complications, total volume of RBC transfusions, number of RBC transfusions, and interval between RBC transfusions. Patients were categorized into the fresh group (≤10 days) and the old group (≥21 days) based on RBC storage time.

Results: Following RBC transfusions, there was a significant improvement in post-transfusion hemoglobin, RBC counts, and hematocrit in both internal medicine and surgery departments. Among medical patients, the fresh group exhibited a shorter hospital stays compared to the old group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.677; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.476 to 0.961; P=0.03]; however, no significant difference was observed among surgical patients. Within surgical patients, the fresh group showed longer interval between RBC transfusions (HR =2.235; 95% CI: 1.145 to 4.363; P=0.02) and required fewer number of RBC transfusions (P=0.04). No significant differences were found in hemoglobin, RBC counts, hematocrit, K+, Ca2+, lactate (Lac), and pH after RBC transfusions.

Conclusions: RBC storage was not associated with 28-day mortality in medical and surgical pediatric patients. Fresh RBC transfusions were found to reduce the length of hospital stays by 32.3% in medical patients, extend the interval between RBC transfusions by 1.235 times and decrease the number of RBC transfusions in surgical patients.

红细胞悬浮储存对儿科预后的影响:儿科医学和儿科外科。
背景:红细胞(RBC)悬浮储存对接受红细胞输血的儿科患者预后的影响尚不确定。因此,我们的目的是研究儿科患者红细胞储存时间与预后之间的关系。方法:对我院2021年内科、外科收治的222例患者进行回顾性研究。评估的主要结局是28天死亡率和住院时间,次要结局包括输血相关并发症、红细胞输注总量、红细胞输注次数和红细胞输注间隔时间。根据红细胞保存时间将患者分为新鲜组(≤10天)和旧组(≥21天)。结果:输血后,内科和外科患者输血后血红蛋白、红细胞计数和红细胞压积均有显著改善。在住院患者中,新生组比老年组住院时间短[危险比(HR) =0.677;95%置信区间(CI): 0.476 ~ 0.961;P = 0.03);然而,在手术患者中没有观察到显著差异。在手术患者中,新鲜组红细胞输注间隔较长(HR =2.235;95% CI: 1.145 ~ 4.363;P=0.02),输血次数较少(P=0.04)。输血后血红蛋白、红细胞计数、红细胞压积、K+、Ca2+、乳酸(Lac)和pH值无显著差异。结论:在内科和外科儿科患者中,红细胞储存与28天死亡率无关。新鲜输血可使内科患者住院时间缩短32.3%,使外科患者输血间隔延长1.235倍,减少输血次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信