Analysis of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Prospective observational study.

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Revista Cuidarte Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.15649/cuidarte.3352
Marta Ferraz-Torres, Ana Diez-Revilla, Ruth Plaza-Unzue, Maria Inés Corcuera-Martinez
{"title":"Analysis of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Prospective observational study.","authors":"Marta Ferraz-Torres, Ana Diez-Revilla, Ruth Plaza-Unzue, Maria Inés Corcuera-Martinez","doi":"10.15649/cuidarte.3352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vascular access teams often use guidelines or algorithms to determine the most appropriate vascular access device based on the patient's condition and the substance to be infused. These guidelines are intended to help identify the most qualified personnel for device insertion, but few studies collect information on the performance of these units.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify the evolution and complication rate of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in patients requiring vascular access.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted over three years. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared using Student's t-test. Nonparametrically distributed variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. For categorical variables, the two-tailed chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used. Regression analysis was performed for the dependent variable of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the PICCs inserted, 61.99% (566) were in patients receiving oncologic treatment, with a mean dwell time of 136±127.51 days. PICCs inserted in hematologic patients had a mean dwell time of 144±141.3 days (p=0.438). The most frequent complications were accidental removal (3.50%, 32, OR 0.581), thrombosis (3%, 27, OR 0.752), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) (2.10%, 19, OR, 0.113).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Complications related to PICCs were infrequent, with thrombosis being the most prevalent. Accidental removal was also frequent, a complication not thoroughly analyzed in other studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICC insertion and management by vascular access teams enables units to achieve a low complication rate in onco-hematological patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":43234,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cuidarte","volume":"15 3","pages":"e3352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cuidarte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.3352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vascular access teams often use guidelines or algorithms to determine the most appropriate vascular access device based on the patient's condition and the substance to be infused. These guidelines are intended to help identify the most qualified personnel for device insertion, but few studies collect information on the performance of these units.

Objective: This study aims to identify the evolution and complication rate of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in patients requiring vascular access.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over three years. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared using Student's t-test. Nonparametrically distributed variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. For categorical variables, the two-tailed chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used. Regression analysis was performed for the dependent variable of complications.

Results: Of the PICCs inserted, 61.99% (566) were in patients receiving oncologic treatment, with a mean dwell time of 136±127.51 days. PICCs inserted in hematologic patients had a mean dwell time of 144±141.3 days (p=0.438). The most frequent complications were accidental removal (3.50%, 32, OR 0.581), thrombosis (3%, 27, OR 0.752), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) (2.10%, 19, OR, 0.113).

Discussion: Complications related to PICCs were infrequent, with thrombosis being the most prevalent. Accidental removal was also frequent, a complication not thoroughly analyzed in other studies.

Conclusions: PICC insertion and management by vascular access teams enables units to achieve a low complication rate in onco-hematological patients.

中心静脉外周置管并发症分析。前瞻性观察研究。
导读:血管准入团队通常根据患者的病情和要注入的物质,使用指南或算法来确定最合适的血管准入设备。这些指南旨在帮助确定最合格的设备插入人员,但很少有研究收集这些单位的性能信息。目的:本研究旨在了解需要血管通路的患者外周插入中心导管(PICCs)的演变和并发症发生率。材料和方法:前瞻性观察研究进行了超过三年。具有正态分布的连续变量采用学生t检验进行比较。非参数分布变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行分析。对于分类变量,使用双尾卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。对并发症因变量进行回归分析。结果:61.99%(566例)的PICCs植入于接受肿瘤治疗的患者,平均停留时间为136±127.51天。PICCs插入血液病患者的平均停留时间为144±141.3天(p=0.438)。最常见的并发症是意外拔管(3.50%,32,OR 0.581)、血栓形成(3%,27,OR 0.752)和中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI) (2.10%, 19, OR 0.113)。讨论:PICCs的并发症并不多见,以血栓形成最为常见。意外切除也很常见,这一并发症在其他研究中没有得到充分的分析。结论:PICC的插入和血管通路小组的管理使单位在肿瘤血液病患者中实现低并发症率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Cuidarte
Revista Cuidarte NURSING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信