Quantification and dosimetric impact of intra-fractional bladder changes during CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for pelvic cancer treatments.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ingrid Valencia Lozano, Elizabeth Buss, Catherine S Spina, David P Horowitz, Lisa A Kachnic, Michael Price, Yi-Fang Wang, Reshma Munbodh
{"title":"Quantification and dosimetric impact of intra-fractional bladder changes during CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for pelvic cancer treatments.","authors":"Ingrid Valencia Lozano, Elizabeth Buss, Catherine S Spina, David P Horowitz, Lisa A Kachnic, Michael Price, Yi-Fang Wang, Reshma Munbodh","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study quantitatively evaluates bladder changes and their dosimetric impact during the on-couch adaptive process on a commercial CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy (CT-gART) platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 183 fractions of ten patients receiving online ART for pelvic cancers were analyzed retrospectively. Bladder contours were automatically generated and revised by an expert for each pair of planning and verification CBCTs. Bladder shape changes were assessed using geometric and boundary distance metrics. A deformable image registration (DIR) workflow was implemented to obtain spatial motion characteristics, validated by the dice similarity coefficient between bladder contours. Dosimetric parameters were quantified by warping 'intended' dose distributions to the verification CBCT anatomy using DIR to evaluate coverage and OAR objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bladder volume changed noticeably during the on-couch adaptation process (19.7 ± 3.3 min). Day-to-day bladder expansion showed an average increase of 3.4 cc/min ± 1.5 cc/min for the full bladder and 0.8 cc/min ± 0.3 cc/min for empty bladder protocols. Deformation occurred mainly in the superior region and was more pronounced for the full bladder protocol. Displacements over 5 mm in cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior directions averaged 16% and 5% of the volume for full bladders and 5% and 4% for empty bladders, respectively. CTV coverage (V100%) was maintained when the bladder was the target, but PTV V95% was reduced by an average of 7%. For non-bladder treatments, bladder constraints increased slightly for supine subjects (0.5 Gy/fx), with prone subjects almost unaffected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A framework using auto-segmentation and DIR was developed to evaluate the intra-fractional motion of the bladder during CTgART. Results suggest that reducing the isotropic PTV margin to less than 7 mm may be feasible for oART, allowing patient-specific anisotropic margins while maintaining the quality of the adaptive plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study quantitatively evaluates bladder changes and their dosimetric impact during the on-couch adaptive process on a commercial CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy (CT-gART) platform.

Methods: Data from 183 fractions of ten patients receiving online ART for pelvic cancers were analyzed retrospectively. Bladder contours were automatically generated and revised by an expert for each pair of planning and verification CBCTs. Bladder shape changes were assessed using geometric and boundary distance metrics. A deformable image registration (DIR) workflow was implemented to obtain spatial motion characteristics, validated by the dice similarity coefficient between bladder contours. Dosimetric parameters were quantified by warping 'intended' dose distributions to the verification CBCT anatomy using DIR to evaluate coverage and OAR objectives.

Results: Bladder volume changed noticeably during the on-couch adaptation process (19.7 ± 3.3 min). Day-to-day bladder expansion showed an average increase of 3.4 cc/min ± 1.5 cc/min for the full bladder and 0.8 cc/min ± 0.3 cc/min for empty bladder protocols. Deformation occurred mainly in the superior region and was more pronounced for the full bladder protocol. Displacements over 5 mm in cranial-caudal and anterior-posterior directions averaged 16% and 5% of the volume for full bladders and 5% and 4% for empty bladders, respectively. CTV coverage (V100%) was maintained when the bladder was the target, but PTV V95% was reduced by an average of 7%. For non-bladder treatments, bladder constraints increased slightly for supine subjects (0.5 Gy/fx), with prone subjects almost unaffected.

Conclusions: A framework using auto-segmentation and DIR was developed to evaluate the intra-fractional motion of the bladder during CTgART. Results suggest that reducing the isotropic PTV margin to less than 7 mm may be feasible for oART, allowing patient-specific anisotropic margins while maintaining the quality of the adaptive plan.

cbct引导下盆腔癌在线适应性放疗期间膀胱变化的定量和剂量学影响。
目的:本研究在商业化的基于cbct的在线自适应放疗(CT-gART)平台上定量评估卧床适应过程中膀胱变化及其剂量学影响。方法:回顾性分析10例接受在线ART治疗盆腔癌患者的183份资料。每对规划和验证cbct由专家自动生成和修改膀胱轮廓。膀胱形状变化评估使用几何和边界距离指标。采用可变形图像配准(DIR)工作流获取膀胱轮廓的空间运动特征,并通过膀胱轮廓之间的骰子相似系数进行验证。剂量学参数通过将“预期”剂量分布翘曲到验证CBCT解剖,使用DIR评估覆盖范围和OAR目标来量化。结果:在床上适应过程中膀胱体积有明显变化(19.7±3.3 min)。每天膀胱扩张显示,膀胱满时平均增加3.4 cc/min±1.5 cc/min,膀胱空时平均增加0.8 cc/min±0.3 cc/min。变形主要发生在上部区域,在全膀胱手术中更为明显。在颅尾和前后方向超过5mm的位移,满膀胱平均占16%和5%,空膀胱平均占5%和4%。膀胱为靶时,CTV覆盖率(V100%)保持不变,但PTV覆盖率(V95%)平均下降7%。对于非膀胱治疗,仰卧位受试者的膀胱约束略有增加(0.5 Gy/fx),俯卧位受试者几乎不受影响。结论:开发了一个使用自动分割和DIR的框架来评估CTgART期间膀胱的分段运动。结果表明,将各向同性PTV边缘减少到小于7 mm对于oART可能是可行的,在保持适应性计划质量的同时,允许患者特定的各向异性边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信