Do the effects of interventions aimed at the prevention of childhood obesity reduce inequities? A re-analysis of randomized trial data from two Cochrane reviews.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103130
Jennifer C Palmer, Annabel L Davies, Francesca Spiga, Berit L Heitmann, Russell Jago, Carolyn D Summerbell, Julian P T Higgins
{"title":"Do the effects of interventions aimed at the prevention of childhood obesity reduce inequities? A re-analysis of randomized trial data from two Cochrane reviews.","authors":"Jennifer C Palmer, Annabel L Davies, Francesca Spiga, Berit L Heitmann, Russell Jago, Carolyn D Summerbell, Julian P T Higgins","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health attempts to prevent obesity in children and young people should aim to minimize health inequalities. Two Cochrane reviews examining interventions aiming to prevent childhood obesity found that interventions promoting (only) physical activity have a small beneficial effect on BMI for people aged 5-18 years, as do interventions promoting physical activity alongside healthy eating for 5-11 year olds. We examined whether the effectiveness of the interventions included in these reviews differed according to eight factors associated with inequity: place, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socio-economic status, and social capital (the PROGRESS framework).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on change in BMI (standardized or unstandardized), subgrouped by baseline measures of PROGRESS factors, for intervention and control groups, from trial authors. We calculated the intervention effect per subgroup (mean difference), then contrasted these to estimate interactions between intervention and the baseline factors. We combined interaction estimates for each factor across trials using meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We collected subgrouped data from 81 trials that took place between 2001 and 2020, involving 84,713 participants. We found no substantial differences in effectiveness of interventions for PROGRESS subgroups in most scenarios. However, in the younger age group (5-11 years), the effect of interventions on standardized BMI appeared to be higher in boys (average difference in mean differences 0.03; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.06; 45 studies, n = 44,740), which was consistent in direction with the BMI effect (average difference in mean differences 0.06 kg/m2; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.13; 31 studies, n = 27,083).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings suggest that those responsible for public health can promote these beneficial interventions without major concerns about increasing inequalities but should be mindful that these interventions may work better in boys aged 5-11 years than girls. More data are needed, so we encourage future trialists to perform subgroup analyses on PROGRESS factors.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"81 ","pages":"103130"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Public health attempts to prevent obesity in children and young people should aim to minimize health inequalities. Two Cochrane reviews examining interventions aiming to prevent childhood obesity found that interventions promoting (only) physical activity have a small beneficial effect on BMI for people aged 5-18 years, as do interventions promoting physical activity alongside healthy eating for 5-11 year olds. We examined whether the effectiveness of the interventions included in these reviews differed according to eight factors associated with inequity: place, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socio-economic status, and social capital (the PROGRESS framework).

Methods: We collected data on change in BMI (standardized or unstandardized), subgrouped by baseline measures of PROGRESS factors, for intervention and control groups, from trial authors. We calculated the intervention effect per subgroup (mean difference), then contrasted these to estimate interactions between intervention and the baseline factors. We combined interaction estimates for each factor across trials using meta-analyses.

Findings: We collected subgrouped data from 81 trials that took place between 2001 and 2020, involving 84,713 participants. We found no substantial differences in effectiveness of interventions for PROGRESS subgroups in most scenarios. However, in the younger age group (5-11 years), the effect of interventions on standardized BMI appeared to be higher in boys (average difference in mean differences 0.03; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.06; 45 studies, n = 44,740), which was consistent in direction with the BMI effect (average difference in mean differences 0.06 kg/m2; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.13; 31 studies, n = 27,083).

Interpretation: Our findings suggest that those responsible for public health can promote these beneficial interventions without major concerns about increasing inequalities but should be mindful that these interventions may work better in boys aged 5-11 years than girls. More data are needed, so we encourage future trialists to perform subgroup analyses on PROGRESS factors.

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

旨在预防儿童肥胖的干预措施的效果是否减少了不平等?对两篇Cochrane综述中随机试验数据的再分析。
背景:预防儿童和青少年肥胖的公共卫生努力应以尽量减少健康不平等为目标。两篇Cochrane综述研究了旨在预防儿童肥胖的干预措施,发现促进(仅)体育活动的干预措施对5-18岁的人的BMI有很小的有益影响,对5-11岁的人来说,促进体育活动和健康饮食的干预措施也是如此。我们根据与不平等相关的八个因素(地点、种族/民族、职业、性别/性别、宗教、教育、社会经济地位和社会资本)检验了这些综述中包括的干预措施的有效性是否存在差异。方法:我们从试验作者处收集BMI变化(标准化或非标准化)的数据,按进展因素的基线测量分组,干预组和对照组。我们计算了每个亚组的干预效果(平均差异),然后对比这些来估计干预和基线因素之间的相互作用。我们使用荟萃分析合并了试验中每个因素的相互作用估计。研究结果:我们收集了2001年至2020年间进行的81项试验的亚组数据,涉及84,713名参与者。我们发现在大多数情况下,PROGRESS亚组的干预措施的有效性没有实质性差异。然而,在年龄较小的年龄组(5-11岁)中,干预措施对标准化BMI的影响似乎在男孩中更高(平均差异0.03;95% CI 0.01 ~ 0.06;45项研究,n = 44,740),与BMI效应方向一致(平均差异0.06 kg/m2;95% CI -0.02 ~ 0.13;31项研究,n = 27,083)。解释:我们的研究结果表明,那些负责公共卫生的人可以促进这些有益的干预措施,而不必担心不平等现象的加剧,但应该注意到,这些干预措施可能对5-11岁的男孩比女孩更有效。需要更多的数据,因此我们鼓励未来的试验人员对进展因素进行亚组分析。资助:国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信