CBCT radiomics features combine machine learning to diagnose cystic lesions in the jaw.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Xiaoyan Sha, Chao Wang, Jiayu Sun, Senrong Qi, Xiaohong Yuan, Hui Zhang, Jigang Yang
{"title":"CBCT radiomics features combine machine learning to diagnose cystic lesions in the jaw.","authors":"Xiaoyan Sha, Chao Wang, Jiayu Sun, Senrong Qi, Xiaohong Yuan, Hui Zhang, Jigang Yang","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a radiomics model based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to differentiate odontogenic cysts (OC), odontogenic keratocysts (OKC) and ameloblastomas (AB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, CBCT images were collected from 300 patients diagnosed with OC, OKC and AB who underwent histopathological diagnosis. These patients were randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from the images, and the optimal features were incorporated into Random Forest model, Support Vector Classifier (SVC) model, Logistic Regression model and a soft VotingClassifier based on the above three algorithms. The performance of the models was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). The optimal model among these was then used to establish the final radiomics prediction model, whose performance was evaluated using the sensitivity, accuracy, precision, specificity and F1 score in both the training cohort and the test cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The six optimal radiomics features were incorporated into a soft VotingClassifier. Its performance was the best overall. The AUC values of the One-vs-Rest (OvR) multiclassification strategy were AB-vs-Rest 0.963; OKC-vs-Rest 0.928; OC-vs-Rest 0.919 in the training cohort and AB-vs-Rest 0.814; OKC-vs-Rest 0.781; OC-vs-Rest 0.849 in the test cohort. The overall accuracy of the model in the training cohort was 0.757, and in the test cohort was 0.711.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VotingClassifier model demonstrated the ability of the CBCT radiomics to distinguish the multiple types of diseases (OC, OKC and AB) in the jaw and may have the potential to diagnose accurately under non-invasive conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a radiomics model based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to differentiate odontogenic cysts (OC), odontogenic keratocysts (OKC) and ameloblastomas (AB).

Methods: In this retrospective study, CBCT images were collected from 300 patients diagnosed with OC, OKC and AB who underwent histopathological diagnosis. These patients were randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from the images, and the optimal features were incorporated into Random Forest model, Support Vector Classifier (SVC) model, Logistic Regression model and a soft VotingClassifier based on the above three algorithms. The performance of the models was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). The optimal model among these was then used to establish the final radiomics prediction model, whose performance was evaluated using the sensitivity, accuracy, precision, specificity and F1 score in both the training cohort and the test cohort.

Results: The six optimal radiomics features were incorporated into a soft VotingClassifier. Its performance was the best overall. The AUC values of the One-vs-Rest (OvR) multiclassification strategy were AB-vs-Rest 0.963; OKC-vs-Rest 0.928; OC-vs-Rest 0.919 in the training cohort and AB-vs-Rest 0.814; OKC-vs-Rest 0.781; OC-vs-Rest 0.849 in the test cohort. The overall accuracy of the model in the training cohort was 0.757, and in the test cohort was 0.711.

Conclusions: The VotingClassifier model demonstrated the ability of the CBCT radiomics to distinguish the multiple types of diseases (OC, OKC and AB) in the jaw and may have the potential to diagnose accurately under non-invasive conditions.

CBCT 放射组学特征结合机器学习诊断颌骨囊性病变。
目的:建立基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的放射组学模型,以鉴别牙源性囊肿(OC)、牙源性角化囊肿(OKC)和成釉细胞瘤(AB)。方法:回顾性研究收集300例经组织病理学诊断为OC、OKC和AB的患者的CBCT图像。这些患者被随机分为训练组(70%)和测试组(30%)。从图像中提取放射组学特征,并将最优特征结合到随机森林模型、支持向量分类器(SVC)模型、Logistic回归模型和基于上述三种算法的软投票分类器中。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型的性能。然后将其中的最优模型建立最终的放射组学预测模型,并通过训练组和测试组的敏感性、准确性、精密度、特异性和F1评分来评价该模型的性能。结果:六个最佳放射组学特征被纳入软投票分类器。它的整体表现是最好的。One-vs-Rest (OvR)多分类策略的AUC值为AB-vs-Rest 0.963;OKC-vs-Rest 0.928;训练组OC-vs-Rest为0.919,AB-vs-Rest为0.814;OKC-vs-Rest 0.781;在测试队列中OC-vs-Rest为0.849。模型在训练队列中的总体准确率为0.757,在测试队列中的总体准确率为0.711。结论:VotingClassifier模型显示了CBCT放射组学区分颌骨多种类型疾病(OC, OKC和AB)的能力,并且可能具有在无创条件下准确诊断的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信