Non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis following knee joint replacement: A systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155251325624
Michelle C Hall, Benjamin Smith, Katie J Sheehan, Stefanny Guerra, Bushra Abdunour, Melanie Narayanasamy, Joanne Stocks, Fiona Moffatt, Catherine Sackley
{"title":"Non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis following knee joint replacement: A systematic review.","authors":"Michelle C Hall, Benjamin Smith, Katie J Sheehan, Stefanny Guerra, Bushra Abdunour, Melanie Narayanasamy, Joanne Stocks, Fiona Moffatt, Catherine Sackley","doi":"10.1177/02692155251325624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for knee stiffness or arthrofibrosis following knee replacement surgery.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)were searched from database inception to October 2024.Review methodsAll studies of non-surgical interventions (versus any/no comparator) for adults who developed knee stiffness or a diagnosis of arthrofibrosis following knee replacement were included. Selection, quality appraisal and extraction were completed in duplicate. Results were synthesised narratively. The risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE criteria were used to evaluate evidence quality.ResultsSixteen studies were included, comprising two randomised-controlled trials (n = 76), one non-randomised controlled trial (n = 35), seven cohort studies (n = 352) and six case studies (n = seven). Interventions varied widely including exercise, manual therapy, mechanical devices, and education. Improvements in knee range of movement were reported with some demonstrating functional gains >110° of knee flexion, but the evidence was of low quality. Limited reporting of intervention descriptions, patient-relevant outcomes including function and pain, and longer-term follow-up hindered comprehensive evaluation.ConclusionThe review highlights the heterogeneity of interventions, emphasising the need for standardised reporting. While some studies showed promise, the lack of control groups, small sample sizes, and varied follow-up durations limit conclusive findings. There is insufficient evidence to support any specific non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis post-arthroplasty. Further research should be a priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"580-599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251325624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for knee stiffness or arthrofibrosis following knee replacement surgery.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)were searched from database inception to October 2024.Review methodsAll studies of non-surgical interventions (versus any/no comparator) for adults who developed knee stiffness or a diagnosis of arthrofibrosis following knee replacement were included. Selection, quality appraisal and extraction were completed in duplicate. Results were synthesised narratively. The risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE criteria were used to evaluate evidence quality.ResultsSixteen studies were included, comprising two randomised-controlled trials (n = 76), one non-randomised controlled trial (n = 35), seven cohort studies (n = 352) and six case studies (n = seven). Interventions varied widely including exercise, manual therapy, mechanical devices, and education. Improvements in knee range of movement were reported with some demonstrating functional gains >110° of knee flexion, but the evidence was of low quality. Limited reporting of intervention descriptions, patient-relevant outcomes including function and pain, and longer-term follow-up hindered comprehensive evaluation.ConclusionThe review highlights the heterogeneity of interventions, emphasising the need for standardised reporting. While some studies showed promise, the lack of control groups, small sample sizes, and varied follow-up durations limit conclusive findings. There is insufficient evidence to support any specific non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis post-arthroplasty. Further research should be a priority.

膝关节置换术后关节纤维化的非手术干预:系统综述。
目的评价非手术干预对膝关节置换术后膝关节僵硬或关节纤维化的疗效。数据来源:检索自数据库建立至2024年10月的Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)和护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)。综述方法纳入了对膝关节置换术后出现膝关节僵硬或诊断为关节纤维化的成人进行非手术干预的所有研究(与有/无比较)。选择、质量评价和提取一式两份完成。对结果进行叙述性综合。评估偏倚风险,采用GRADE标准评价证据质量。结果共纳入16项研究,包括2项随机对照试验(n = 76)、1项非随机对照试验(n = 35)、7项队列研究(n = 352)和6项病例研究(n = 7)。干预措施多种多样,包括锻炼、手工治疗、机械装置和教育。据报道,膝关节活动范围有所改善,其中一些显示膝关节屈曲度达到110°,但证据质量较低。干预措施描述、患者相关结果(包括功能和疼痛)和长期随访的有限报道阻碍了全面评估。结论本综述强调了干预措施的异质性,强调了标准化报告的必要性。虽然一些研究显示出希望,但缺乏对照组,样本量小,随访时间长短不一,限制了结论性发现。没有足够的证据支持任何特定的非手术干预治疗关节置换术后关节纤维化。进一步的研究应该是一个优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信