Sex-based differences in biomechanical function for chronic low back pain and how it relates to pain experience.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Erin Archibeck, Irina Strigo, Aaron Scheffler, Abel Torres-Espin, Karim Khattab, Pavlos Silvestros, Robert Matthew, Caitlin Regan, Paul Hodges, Conor O'Neill, Jeffrey Lotz, Grace O'Connell, Jeannie Bailey
{"title":"Sex-based differences in biomechanical function for chronic low back pain and how it relates to pain experience.","authors":"Erin Archibeck, Irina Strigo, Aaron Scheffler, Abel Torres-Espin, Karim Khattab, Pavlos Silvestros, Robert Matthew, Caitlin Regan, Paul Hodges, Conor O'Neill, Jeffrey Lotz, Grace O'Connell, Jeannie Bailey","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08730-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The relationship between pain experience and biomechanical impairment in chronic low back pain (LBP) is unclear. Among the broader pain literature, sex-based differences in pain experience have been established. However, it is unknown if sex-based differences in pain experience relates to compromised movement patterns for patients with chronic LBP. This study examined sex differences and whether there are sex-based associations between pain experience and biomechanical function in patients with chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To capture the biomechanical variability among LBP patients, we quantified full-body movement quality based on the extent that 3D postural trajectories deviated from matched controls during a sit-to-stand task (Kinematic Composite Score, K-Score). For both males and females, the K-Score was compared to pain measures, including patient-reported metrics and quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain threshold, PPT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant sex-based differences in pain experience and biomechanical function in patients with LBP. Specifically, males exhibited ~ 8% lower trunk K-Scores, indicating biomechanical function that deviated more from controls when compared to female participants (p < 0.001). However, females exhibited PPT values 29% and 41% lower than males at the control and pain sites, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was a weak but significant negative association between PPT and K-Scores for males (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.14, p < 0.01), while females lacked an association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, males with LBP exhibited worse movement quality, driven by trunk motion, but higher PPTs. Possible explanations include reduced interoceptive awareness or increased kinesiophobia in males, which may influence movement patterns. This research is an initial step in uncovering the complex relationship between patient-specific factors influencing LBP disability, laying the groundwork for further exploration, and paving the way for improving outcomes with patient-specific treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08730-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between pain experience and biomechanical impairment in chronic low back pain (LBP) is unclear. Among the broader pain literature, sex-based differences in pain experience have been established. However, it is unknown if sex-based differences in pain experience relates to compromised movement patterns for patients with chronic LBP. This study examined sex differences and whether there are sex-based associations between pain experience and biomechanical function in patients with chronic LBP.

Methods: To capture the biomechanical variability among LBP patients, we quantified full-body movement quality based on the extent that 3D postural trajectories deviated from matched controls during a sit-to-stand task (Kinematic Composite Score, K-Score). For both males and females, the K-Score was compared to pain measures, including patient-reported metrics and quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain threshold, PPT).

Results: There were significant sex-based differences in pain experience and biomechanical function in patients with LBP. Specifically, males exhibited ~ 8% lower trunk K-Scores, indicating biomechanical function that deviated more from controls when compared to female participants (p < 0.001). However, females exhibited PPT values 29% and 41% lower than males at the control and pain sites, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was a weak but significant negative association between PPT and K-Scores for males (R2 = 0.14, p < 0.01), while females lacked an association.

Conclusion: Overall, males with LBP exhibited worse movement quality, driven by trunk motion, but higher PPTs. Possible explanations include reduced interoceptive awareness or increased kinesiophobia in males, which may influence movement patterns. This research is an initial step in uncovering the complex relationship between patient-specific factors influencing LBP disability, laying the groundwork for further exploration, and paving the way for improving outcomes with patient-specific treatments.

目的:慢性腰背痛(LBP)中疼痛体验与生物力学损伤之间的关系尚不清楚。在更广泛的疼痛文献中,已经确定了疼痛体验的性别差异。然而,疼痛体验的性别差异是否与慢性腰背痛患者的运动模式受损有关,目前尚不清楚。本研究探讨了慢性枸杞痛患者的性别差异以及疼痛体验与生物力学功能之间是否存在基于性别的关联:为了捕捉椎管内疼痛患者的生物力学变异性,我们根据坐立任务中三维姿势轨迹偏离匹配对照组的程度(运动综合评分,K-Score)来量化全身运动质量。我们将男性和女性的 K-Score 与疼痛指标进行了比较,包括患者报告指标和定量感觉测试(压痛阈值,PPT):结果:腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛体验和生物力学功能存在明显的性别差异。具体而言,与女性参与者相比,男性的躯干 K 值低约 8%,这表明生物力学功能偏离对照组的程度更高(P 2 = 0.14,P 结论:总体而言,男性腰椎间盘突出症患者的躯干 K 值比对照组低约 8%,这表明生物力学功能偏离对照组的程度更高:总体而言,患有枸杞多糖症的男性在躯干运动的驱动下表现出更差的运动质量,但 PPT 值却更高。可能的解释包括男性的内感知意识降低或运动恐惧增加,这可能会影响运动模式。这项研究为揭示影响枸杞多糖症残疾的患者特异性因素之间的复杂关系迈出了第一步,为进一步探索奠定了基础,并为改善患者特异性治疗的效果铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信