Thulium laser en bloc resection is a safe and efficacious alternative to conventional bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.103.R1
Osama Zaytoun, Neeraja Tillu, Kaushik Kolanukuduru, Arjun Venkatesh, Manish Choudhary, Zachary Dovey, Tommasangelo Petitti, Maida Bada, Maurizio Buscarini
{"title":"Thulium laser en bloc resection is a safe and efficacious alternative to conventional bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors.","authors":"Osama Zaytoun, Neeraja Tillu, Kaushik Kolanukuduru, Arjun Venkatesh, Manish Choudhary, Zachary Dovey, Tommasangelo Petitti, Maida Bada, Maurizio Buscarini","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.103.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors (bTURBT) is the standard of care technique for the management of bladder tumors; however, new techniques such as thulium laser en bloc resection of bladder tumors (TmLRBT) have been introduced as alternatives to bTURBT. In this study, detrusor muscle acquisition, perioperative outcomes and survival outcomes after TmLRBT and bTURBT were prospectively compared in patients with primary bladder tumors (1-5 cm).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective interventional study, conducted over ten years, involved 542 patients under a single surgeon. Inclusion criteria were a single tumor of 1-5 cm. The primary endpoint was the presence or absence of detrusor muscle. Perioperative criteria included operative time, hospital stay length, catheterization duration, bladder perforations, readmissions, and complication incidence. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with subgroup comparisons by the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 449 patients, 211 underwent TmLRBT and 238 underwent bTURBT. Detrusor muscle was present in 201 (95.2%) TmLRBT patients vs 154 (64.7%) bTURBT patients (p <0.001). Complications were less frequent in the TmLRBT group (p <0.05). Hemoglobin drop (p <0.001), hospital stay (p <0.001), catheterization duration (p <0.001), and operative time (p <0.001) were all significantly lower in the TmLRBT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in RFS (p = 0.255) and CSS (p = 0.258) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TmLRBT demonstrated significantly better detrusor muscle inclusion and perioperative outcomes compared to bTURBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 3","pages":"466-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.103.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors (bTURBT) is the standard of care technique for the management of bladder tumors; however, new techniques such as thulium laser en bloc resection of bladder tumors (TmLRBT) have been introduced as alternatives to bTURBT. In this study, detrusor muscle acquisition, perioperative outcomes and survival outcomes after TmLRBT and bTURBT were prospectively compared in patients with primary bladder tumors (1-5 cm).

Material and methods: This prospective interventional study, conducted over ten years, involved 542 patients under a single surgeon. Inclusion criteria were a single tumor of 1-5 cm. The primary endpoint was the presence or absence of detrusor muscle. Perioperative criteria included operative time, hospital stay length, catheterization duration, bladder perforations, readmissions, and complication incidence. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with subgroup comparisons by the log-rank test.

Results: Of 449 patients, 211 underwent TmLRBT and 238 underwent bTURBT. Detrusor muscle was present in 201 (95.2%) TmLRBT patients vs 154 (64.7%) bTURBT patients (p <0.001). Complications were less frequent in the TmLRBT group (p <0.05). Hemoglobin drop (p <0.001), hospital stay (p <0.001), catheterization duration (p <0.001), and operative time (p <0.001) were all significantly lower in the TmLRBT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in RFS (p = 0.255) and CSS (p = 0.258) between the groups.

Conclusions: TmLRBT demonstrated significantly better detrusor muscle inclusion and perioperative outcomes compared to bTURBT.

铥激光整体切除术是传统双极经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的一种安全有效的替代方法。
导言:双极经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(bTURBT)是治疗膀胱肿瘤的标准护理技术;然而,新技术如铥激光膀胱肿瘤整体切除术(TmLRBT)已被引入作为bTURBT的替代品。本研究前瞻性比较了原发性膀胱肿瘤(1-5 cm)患者TmLRBT和bTURBT后的逼尿肌获得、围手术期结局和生存结局。材料和方法:这项前瞻性介入研究,在一名外科医生的指导下进行了10年,涉及542名患者。纳入标准为1-5 cm的单个肿瘤。主要终点是有无逼尿肌。围手术期标准包括手术时间、住院时间、导尿时间、膀胱穿孔、再入院和并发症发生率。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析无复发生存期(RFS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS),采用log-rank检验进行亚组比较。结果:449例患者中,211例行TmLRBT, 238例行bTURBT。201例(95.2%)TmLRBT患者存在逼尿肌,而154例(64.7%)bTURBT患者存在逼尿肌(p)结论:与bTURBT相比,TmLRBT表现出明显更好的逼尿肌包膜和围手术期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信