Outcomes and predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by transperineal computer fusion biopsy during active surveillance.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.95.R1
Tomasz Milecki, Wojciech Malewski, Anna Barnaś, Omar Tayara, Andrzej Antczak, Piotr Kryst, Łukasz Nyk
{"title":"Outcomes and predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by transperineal computer fusion biopsy during active surveillance.","authors":"Tomasz Milecki, Wojciech Malewski, Anna Barnaś, Omar Tayara, Andrzej Antczak, Piotr Kryst, Łukasz Nyk","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.95.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Active surveillance (AS) is an option for management of low-risk and selected intermediate prostate cancer (PC) patients. Pathological progression confirmed on prostate biopsy (PB) is the most common reason for transitioning to radical treatment. The role and timing of repeat PB during AS is a topic of ongoing debate.The aim of the study was to determine the detection rate of clinically significant PC (csPC) during AS protocol by transperineal computer fusion PB in low-risk PC patients enrolled based on results of transrectal systematic PB, and to identify predictors that may impact csPC detection.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 95 patients with low-risk PC enrolled in AS, who underwent confirmatory or follow-up PB, proceeded by mpMRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reclassification rate to csPC was 38.9% and 43.9% for confirmatory and follow-up biopsies, respectively. Patients with csPC differed significantly from those without csPC in the following parameters: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10.5 ng/ml vs 7.3 ng/ml (p = 0.029), PSA density (PSAD) 0.27 ng/ml<sup>2</sup> vs 0.18 ng/ml<sup>2</sup> (p = 0.006), age - 68 years vs 66.5 years (p = 0.024), lesion size 16 mm vs 14 mm (p = 0.042), and PIRADS score (p = 0.004). Multivariable regression models showed that PIRADS score each one-category increase hazard ratio (HR) - 3.615 (1.599-8.172), PSAD >0.20 ng/ml<sup>2</sup>; HR - 2.760 (1.065-7.149) and age; HR - 1.085 (1.011-1.164) were independent factors increasing the probability of csPC detection in PB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Confirmatory and repeat transperineal PB detect a significant rate of csPC in low-risk PC patients on AS. Higher PIRADS score and PSAD >0.20 ng/ml<sup>2</sup> increase the csPC detection rates during AS and should prompt immediate PB.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 3","pages":"418-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.95.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Active surveillance (AS) is an option for management of low-risk and selected intermediate prostate cancer (PC) patients. Pathological progression confirmed on prostate biopsy (PB) is the most common reason for transitioning to radical treatment. The role and timing of repeat PB during AS is a topic of ongoing debate.The aim of the study was to determine the detection rate of clinically significant PC (csPC) during AS protocol by transperineal computer fusion PB in low-risk PC patients enrolled based on results of transrectal systematic PB, and to identify predictors that may impact csPC detection.

Material and methods: The study involved 95 patients with low-risk PC enrolled in AS, who underwent confirmatory or follow-up PB, proceeded by mpMRI.

Results: The reclassification rate to csPC was 38.9% and 43.9% for confirmatory and follow-up biopsies, respectively. Patients with csPC differed significantly from those without csPC in the following parameters: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10.5 ng/ml vs 7.3 ng/ml (p = 0.029), PSA density (PSAD) 0.27 ng/ml2 vs 0.18 ng/ml2 (p = 0.006), age - 68 years vs 66.5 years (p = 0.024), lesion size 16 mm vs 14 mm (p = 0.042), and PIRADS score (p = 0.004). Multivariable regression models showed that PIRADS score each one-category increase hazard ratio (HR) - 3.615 (1.599-8.172), PSAD >0.20 ng/ml2; HR - 2.760 (1.065-7.149) and age; HR - 1.085 (1.011-1.164) were independent factors increasing the probability of csPC detection in PB.

Conclusions: Confirmatory and repeat transperineal PB detect a significant rate of csPC in low-risk PC patients on AS. Higher PIRADS score and PSAD >0.20 ng/ml2 increase the csPC detection rates during AS and should prompt immediate PB.

在主动监测期间通过经会阴计算机融合活检发现有临床意义的前列腺癌的结果和预测因素。
导言:主动监测(AS)是治疗低危和部分中危前列腺癌(PC)患者的一种选择。前列腺活检(PB)证实的病理进展是转为根治性治疗的最常见原因。该研究旨在确定根据经直肠系统性前列腺活检结果入组的低危 PC 患者在 AS 方案期间通过经会阴计算机融合前列腺活检对有临床意义的 PC(csPC)的检出率,并确定可能影响 csPC 检出的预测因素:研究涉及 95 例在 AS 中登记的低风险 PC 患者,他们接受了经 mpMRI 进行的确诊或随访 PB:结果:确诊活检和随访活检的 csPC 重分类率分别为 38.9% 和 43.9%。csPC 患者与非 csPC 患者在以下参数上有显著差异:前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 10.5 ng/ml vs 7.3 ng/ml (p = 0. 029)、PSA 密度 (PSA) 10.5 ng/ml vs 7.3 ng/ml (p = 0. 029)029)、PSA 密度 (PSAD) 0.27 ng/ml2 vs 0.18 ng/ml2 (p = 0.006)、年龄 - 68 岁 vs 66.5 岁(p = 0.024)、病变大小 16 mm vs 14 mm(p = 0.042)和 PIRADS 评分(p = 0.004)。多变量回归模型显示,PIRADS 评分每增加一个类别危险比 (HR) - 3.615 (1.599-8.172)、PSAD >0.20 ng/ml2; HR - 2.760 (1.065-7.149) 和年龄; HR - 1.085 (1.011-1.164) 是增加 PB 中 csPC 检测概率的独立因素:结论:在接受强直性脊柱炎治疗的低风险 PC 患者中,确诊和重复经会阴 PB 可检出大量 csPC。较高的 PIRADS 评分和 PSAD >0.20 ng/ml2 会增加 AS 期间的 csPC 检出率,因此应立即进行 PB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信