Genitourinary microbiomes and prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of tumorigeneses and cancer characteristics.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.80
Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Akihiro Matsukawa, Arman Alimohammadi, Jakob Klemm, Ichiro Tsuboi, Tamás Fazekas, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Sever Chiujdea, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"Genitourinary microbiomes and prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of tumorigeneses and cancer characteristics.","authors":"Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Akihiro Matsukawa, Arman Alimohammadi, Jakob Klemm, Ichiro Tsuboi, Tamás Fazekas, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Sever Chiujdea, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed the association of genitourinary microbiomes with prostate cancer (PCa) tumorigeneses and cancer characteristics.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic search and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The primary endpoints were the association between relative abundance of genitourinary microbiomes and PCa compared to non-cancerous men/prostate specimen, high grade disease, and disease progression. The odds ratio (OR) was used as the summary statistic, and results were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies, comprising 2,195 patients were eligible for review and meta-analysis. The specific microbiomes in urine, prostate tissue, and prostate (or seminal) secretions were significantly more abundant in patients with PCa compared to men in the control groups in individual studies. Certain bacterial phyla, genuses, and species were significantly associated with PCa aggressiveness and disease progression in individual studies. The relative abundance meta-analysis of five urine microbiomes revealed no statistically significant differences between PCa patients and control groups (pooled OR, 1.35; 95% CI: 0.70-2.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review indicates that specific genitourinary microbiomes are more abundant in PCa and have a potential to predict/prognosticate disease aggressiveness and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution owing to the significant heterogeneity among studies in terms of microbiome analysis method, assessed sample's characteristics, and individual biological behavior of microbiomes for analysis. Further studies are needed to validate these observations and shed more light on the role of the microbiome across the development and natural history of PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 3","pages":"447-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed the association of genitourinary microbiomes with prostate cancer (PCa) tumorigeneses and cancer characteristics.

Material and methods: A systematic search and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The primary endpoints were the association between relative abundance of genitourinary microbiomes and PCa compared to non-cancerous men/prostate specimen, high grade disease, and disease progression. The odds ratio (OR) was used as the summary statistic, and results were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Seventeen studies, comprising 2,195 patients were eligible for review and meta-analysis. The specific microbiomes in urine, prostate tissue, and prostate (or seminal) secretions were significantly more abundant in patients with PCa compared to men in the control groups in individual studies. Certain bacterial phyla, genuses, and species were significantly associated with PCa aggressiveness and disease progression in individual studies. The relative abundance meta-analysis of five urine microbiomes revealed no statistically significant differences between PCa patients and control groups (pooled OR, 1.35; 95% CI: 0.70-2.59).

Conclusions: Our systematic review indicates that specific genitourinary microbiomes are more abundant in PCa and have a potential to predict/prognosticate disease aggressiveness and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution owing to the significant heterogeneity among studies in terms of microbiome analysis method, assessed sample's characteristics, and individual biological behavior of microbiomes for analysis. Further studies are needed to validate these observations and shed more light on the role of the microbiome across the development and natural history of PCa.

泌尿生殖系统微生物组和前列腺癌:肿瘤基因和癌症特征的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:我们评估了泌尿生殖系统微生物组与前列腺癌(PCa)肿瘤发生和癌症特征的关系。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析声明的首选报告项目进行系统搜索和荟萃分析。主要终点是与非癌男性/前列腺标本相比,泌尿生殖系统微生物组的相对丰度与前列腺癌、高级别疾病和疾病进展之间的关联。采用优势比(OR)作为汇总统计量,结果以95%置信区间(CI)报告。结果:17项研究,包括2195名患者符合回顾和荟萃分析的条件。在个体研究中,前列腺癌患者的尿液、前列腺组织和前列腺(或精液)分泌物中的特定微生物群明显比对照组的男性更丰富。在个别研究中,某些细菌门、属和种与前列腺癌侵袭性和疾病进展显著相关。5种尿液微生物组的相对丰度荟萃分析显示,PCa患者与对照组之间无统计学差异(合并OR, 1.35;95% ci: 0.70-2.59)。结论:我们的系统综述表明,特定的泌尿生殖系统微生物组在前列腺癌中更丰富,并且有可能预测/预后疾病的侵袭性和临床结果。然而,由于研究之间在微生物组分析方法、评估样本特征和分析微生物组的个体生物学行为方面存在显着异质性,因此应谨慎解释这些发现。需要进一步的研究来验证这些观察结果,并进一步阐明微生物组在PCa的发展和自然历史中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信