Bayesian dynamic borrowing in group-sequential design for medical device studies.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Vittoria Chiaruttini, Giulia Lorenzoni, Dario Gregori
{"title":"Bayesian dynamic borrowing in group-sequential design for medical device studies.","authors":"Maria Vittoria Chiaruttini, Giulia Lorenzoni, Dario Gregori","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02520-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of historical data into ongoing clinical trials through Bayesian Dynamic Borrowing offers significant advantages, including reduced sample size, trial duration, and associated costs. However, challenges such as ensuring exchangeability between historical and current data and mitigating Type I error inflation remain critical. This study proposes a Bayesian group-sequential design incorporating a Self-Adaptive Mixture (SAM) prior framework to address these challenges in medical device trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAM prior combines informative priors derived from historical data with weakly informative priors, dynamically adjusting the weight of historical information based on congruence with current trial data. The design includes interim analyses, with Bayesian decision rules leveraging futility and efficacy boundaries derived using the frequentist spending functions. Effective Sample Size calculations informed adjustments to sample size and allocation ratios between experimental and control arms at each interim. The methodology was evaluated using a motivating example from a cardiovascular device trial with a noninferiority hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four historical studies with substantial heterogeneity were incorporated. The SAM prior showed improved adaptation to prior-data conflicts compared to static methods, maintaining Type I error and Power at their nominal levels. In the motivating trial, the MAP prior was approximated as a mixture of beta distributions, facilitating congruence testing and posterior inference. Simulation studies confirmed the proposed design's efficiency under both congruent and incongruent scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed Bayesian Group-Sequential Design with SAM prior offers a robust, adaptive framework for medical device trials, balancing statistical rigor with clinical interpretability. This approach enhances decision-making and supports timely, cost-effective evaluations, particularly in dynamic contexts like medical device development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02520-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of historical data into ongoing clinical trials through Bayesian Dynamic Borrowing offers significant advantages, including reduced sample size, trial duration, and associated costs. However, challenges such as ensuring exchangeability between historical and current data and mitigating Type I error inflation remain critical. This study proposes a Bayesian group-sequential design incorporating a Self-Adaptive Mixture (SAM) prior framework to address these challenges in medical device trials.

Methods: The SAM prior combines informative priors derived from historical data with weakly informative priors, dynamically adjusting the weight of historical information based on congruence with current trial data. The design includes interim analyses, with Bayesian decision rules leveraging futility and efficacy boundaries derived using the frequentist spending functions. Effective Sample Size calculations informed adjustments to sample size and allocation ratios between experimental and control arms at each interim. The methodology was evaluated using a motivating example from a cardiovascular device trial with a noninferiority hypothesis.

Results: Four historical studies with substantial heterogeneity were incorporated. The SAM prior showed improved adaptation to prior-data conflicts compared to static methods, maintaining Type I error and Power at their nominal levels. In the motivating trial, the MAP prior was approximated as a mixture of beta distributions, facilitating congruence testing and posterior inference. Simulation studies confirmed the proposed design's efficiency under both congruent and incongruent scenarios.

Conclusions: The proposed Bayesian Group-Sequential Design with SAM prior offers a robust, adaptive framework for medical device trials, balancing statistical rigor with clinical interpretability. This approach enhances decision-making and supports timely, cost-effective evaluations, particularly in dynamic contexts like medical device development.

医疗器械研究分组序列设计中的贝叶斯动态借贷。
背景:通过贝叶斯动态借用将历史数据整合到正在进行的临床试验中具有显著的优势,包括减少样本量、试验持续时间和相关成本。然而,诸如确保历史和当前数据之间的可交换性以及减轻I型错误膨胀等挑战仍然至关重要。本研究提出了一种贝叶斯组序列设计,结合自适应混合(SAM)先验框架来解决医疗器械试验中的这些挑战。方法:将基于历史数据的信息先验与弱信息先验相结合,根据与当前试验数据的一致性动态调整历史信息的权重。该设计包括中期分析,使用贝叶斯决策规则利用使用频率主义者支出函数导出的无效性和有效性边界。有效样本量的计算为每次中期调整样本量和实验组与对照组之间的分配比例提供了信息。使用来自心血管装置试验的一个具有非劣效性假设的激励示例来评估该方法。结果:纳入了四项具有显著异质性的历史研究。与静态方法相比,SAM先前显示出对先前数据冲突的更好适应,将I型误差和功率保持在其名义水平。在激励试验中,MAP先验近似为beta分布的混合,便于一致性检验和后验推理。仿真研究证实了该设计在一致和不一致情况下的有效性。结论:提出的具有SAM先验的贝叶斯组序列设计为医疗器械试验提供了一个强大的、自适应的框架,平衡了统计严谨性和临床可解释性。这种方法可以加强决策并支持及时、具有成本效益的评估,特别是在医疗设备开发等动态环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信