Status of thyroid surgery-related medical disputes in China.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-448
Peiliang Zhao, Lin Chen, Zhaoyue Li, Bin Luo
{"title":"Status of thyroid surgery-related medical disputes in China.","authors":"Peiliang Zhao, Lin Chen, Zhaoyue Li, Bin Luo","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid diseases, particularly thyroid cancer, are becoming increasingly prevalent, with surgery remaining one of the primary treatments. However, thyroidectomy may result in complications and medical disputes, but very little research has examined this subject in the Chinese context. The study aims to conduct a retrospective analysis of thyroid surgery-related medical disputes in China, offering insights into conflict resolution and risk avoidance in both legal and medical contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed thyroid surgery-related medical dispute cases that occurred from 2010 to 2022 via the China Judgments Online website (https://wenshu.court.gov.cn). Before being included in the analysis, each case in the database was examined and carefully read to ensure that it was a dispute event caused by complications from thyroid surgery. Data collected included patient demographics, disease and surgical details, and judicial outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 198 thyroid surgery disputes, with 74.2% of the patients being female and 58.6% being under 60 years old. Benign disease diagnoses accounted for 52.0% of cases, and traditional open surgery was predominant, occurring in 95.5% of the cases. An increased likelihood of complications and disputes was observed with more extensive surgeries. Tertiary hospitals were the defendants in 84.8% of these cases. The peak period of disputes was from 2011 to 2015, accounting for 51.0% of the total, with a notable concentration of cases in eastern China, accounting for 39.9%. The main causes of disputes were nerve damage (29.8%), parathyroid impairment (29.8%), and disagreements in resection scope (11.5%). Cases of hemorrhage led to the highest mean compensation amount [average Chinese Yuan (CNY) ¥680,000], followed by lymph fistula (CNY ¥524,000) and tracheoesophageal injury (CNY ¥466,000). In 66.7% of cases, the defendants were deemed equally or more responsible than plaintiffs. The average expected compensation was CNY ¥577,000, with the actual compensation being CNY ¥248,000, or 43.0% of the expected amount. Judgments were issued on average of 3.8 years after surgery, and only 10.6% were resolved within the same year and 21.2% after over 5 years, with the longest dispute lasting 45 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical disputes related to thyroid surgery primarily arise from nerve and parathyroid damage, with significant discrepancies between the expected and awarded compensation amounts. Lengthy resolution times highlight the need for enhanced communication related to surgical risk and a more efficient medical dispute resolution process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":"196-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thyroid diseases, particularly thyroid cancer, are becoming increasingly prevalent, with surgery remaining one of the primary treatments. However, thyroidectomy may result in complications and medical disputes, but very little research has examined this subject in the Chinese context. The study aims to conduct a retrospective analysis of thyroid surgery-related medical disputes in China, offering insights into conflict resolution and risk avoidance in both legal and medical contexts.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed thyroid surgery-related medical dispute cases that occurred from 2010 to 2022 via the China Judgments Online website (https://wenshu.court.gov.cn). Before being included in the analysis, each case in the database was examined and carefully read to ensure that it was a dispute event caused by complications from thyroid surgery. Data collected included patient demographics, disease and surgical details, and judicial outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software).

Results: We identified 198 thyroid surgery disputes, with 74.2% of the patients being female and 58.6% being under 60 years old. Benign disease diagnoses accounted for 52.0% of cases, and traditional open surgery was predominant, occurring in 95.5% of the cases. An increased likelihood of complications and disputes was observed with more extensive surgeries. Tertiary hospitals were the defendants in 84.8% of these cases. The peak period of disputes was from 2011 to 2015, accounting for 51.0% of the total, with a notable concentration of cases in eastern China, accounting for 39.9%. The main causes of disputes were nerve damage (29.8%), parathyroid impairment (29.8%), and disagreements in resection scope (11.5%). Cases of hemorrhage led to the highest mean compensation amount [average Chinese Yuan (CNY) ¥680,000], followed by lymph fistula (CNY ¥524,000) and tracheoesophageal injury (CNY ¥466,000). In 66.7% of cases, the defendants were deemed equally or more responsible than plaintiffs. The average expected compensation was CNY ¥577,000, with the actual compensation being CNY ¥248,000, or 43.0% of the expected amount. Judgments were issued on average of 3.8 years after surgery, and only 10.6% were resolved within the same year and 21.2% after over 5 years, with the longest dispute lasting 45 years.

Conclusions: Medical disputes related to thyroid surgery primarily arise from nerve and parathyroid damage, with significant discrepancies between the expected and awarded compensation amounts. Lengthy resolution times highlight the need for enhanced communication related to surgical risk and a more efficient medical dispute resolution process.

中国甲状腺手术相关医疗纠纷的现状。
背景:甲状腺疾病,尤其是甲状腺癌的发病率越来越高,手术仍然是主要的治疗方法之一。然而,甲状腺切除术可能会导致并发症和医疗纠纷,但很少有研究针对中国的这一问题。本研究旨在对中国甲状腺手术相关医疗纠纷进行回顾性分析,为法律和医疗背景下的冲突解决和风险规避提供见解:这项回顾性研究通过中国裁判文书网(https://wenshu.court.gov.cn)分析了2010年至2022年发生的甲状腺手术相关医疗纠纷案件。在纳入分析之前,对数据库中的每一个案例都进行了检查和仔细阅读,以确保其为甲状腺手术并发症引起的纠纷事件。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、疾病和手术细节以及司法结果。统计分析使用 GraphPad Prism 9(GraphPad 软件)进行:我们发现了 198 起甲状腺手术纠纷,其中 74.2% 的患者为女性,58.6% 的患者年龄在 60 岁以下。良性疾病诊断占 52.0%,传统开刀手术占多数,占 95.5%。据观察,手术范围越大,发生并发症和纠纷的可能性就越大。在这些案例中,84.8% 的被告是三级医院。争议的高峰期为 2011 年至 2015 年,占总数的 51.0%,其中华东地区的案例明显集中,占 39.9%。争议的主要原因是神经损伤(29.8%)、甲状旁腺功能损害(29.8%)和切除范围分歧(11.5%)。大出血导致的平均赔偿金额最高[平均人民币 68 万元],其次是淋巴瘘(人民币 52.4 万元)和气管食管损伤(人民币 46.6 万元)。在 66.7% 的案件中,被告被认为比原告承担同等或更多责任。平均预期赔偿额为人民币 577,000 元,实际赔偿额为人民币 248,000 元,占预期赔偿额的 43.0%。判决平均在术后3.8年做出,仅有10.6%的案件在当年内得到解决,21.2%的案件在5年以上得到解决,最长的纠纷持续了45年:结论:与甲状腺手术相关的医疗纠纷主要源于神经和甲状旁腺损伤,预期赔偿额与裁定赔偿额之间存在巨大差异。漫长的解决时间凸显了加强手术风险沟通和提高医疗纠纷解决流程效率的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信