Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the french society of intensive care medicine.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Romain Sonneville, Eric Azabou, Pierre Bailly, Sarah Benghanem, Gilles De Almeida Cardoso, Pierre Claquin, David Cortier, Augustin Gaudemer, Bertrand Hermann, Pierre Jaquet, Virginie Lambrecq, Camille Legouy, Stéphane Legriel, Thomas Rambaud, Benjamin Rohaut, Benjamine Sarton, Stein Silva, Tarek Sharshar, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Dominique Vodovar, Nicolas Weiss, Charles Cerf
{"title":"Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the french society of intensive care medicine.","authors":"Romain Sonneville, Eric Azabou, Pierre Bailly, Sarah Benghanem, Gilles De Almeida Cardoso, Pierre Claquin, David Cortier, Augustin Gaudemer, Bertrand Hermann, Pierre Jaquet, Virginie Lambrecq, Camille Legouy, Stéphane Legriel, Thomas Rambaud, Benjamin Rohaut, Benjamine Sarton, Stein Silva, Tarek Sharshar, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Dominique Vodovar, Nicolas Weiss, Charles Cerf","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01436-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute encephalopathy in the ICU poses significant diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Standardized expert guidelines on acute encephalopathy are needed to improve diagnostic methods, therapeutic decisions, and prognostication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experts conducted a review of the literature, analysed it according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and made proposals for guidelines, which were rated by other experts. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis of expert work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 39 recommendations. Among the 39 formalized recommendations, 1 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1 +) and 10 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2 + or 2-). These recommendations describe indication for ICU admission, use of clinical scores and EEG for diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication. The remaining 28 recommendations were based on expert consensus. These recomandations describe common indications for blood and CSF studies, neuroimaging, use of neuromonitoring, and provide guidelines for management in the acute phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This expert consensus statement aims to provide a structured framework to enhance the consistency and quality of care for ICU patients presenting with acute encephalopathy. By integrating high-quality evidence with expert opinion, it offers a pragmatic approach to addressing the complex nature of acute encephalopathy in the ICU, promoting best practices in patient care and facilitating future research in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01436-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute encephalopathy in the ICU poses significant diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Standardized expert guidelines on acute encephalopathy are needed to improve diagnostic methods, therapeutic decisions, and prognostication.

Methods: The experts conducted a review of the literature, analysed it according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and made proposals for guidelines, which were rated by other experts. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.

Results: The synthesis of expert work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 39 recommendations. Among the 39 formalized recommendations, 1 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1 +) and 10 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2 + or 2-). These recommendations describe indication for ICU admission, use of clinical scores and EEG for diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication. The remaining 28 recommendations were based on expert consensus. These recomandations describe common indications for blood and CSF studies, neuroimaging, use of neuromonitoring, and provide guidelines for management in the acute phase.

Conclusion: This expert consensus statement aims to provide a structured framework to enhance the consistency and quality of care for ICU patients presenting with acute encephalopathy. By integrating high-quality evidence with expert opinion, it offers a pragmatic approach to addressing the complex nature of acute encephalopathy in the ICU, promoting best practices in patient care and facilitating future research in the field.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信