Caregiver needs in end-of-life care are diverse, yet invisible: a narrative review.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Alice Koo, Michelle Low, Zhi-Zheng Yeo, Jonathan Ee, Poh-Heng Chong
{"title":"Caregiver needs in end-of-life care are diverse, yet invisible: a narrative review.","authors":"Alice Koo, Michelle Low, Zhi-Zheng Yeo, Jonathan Ee, Poh-Heng Chong","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Informal caregivers are essential to home-based end-of-life (EOL) care. However, their needs are often not well-understood and described in relation to caregiving, rather than with a 'caregiver-centric' perspective. This review aimed to provide an overview of research on EOL caregiver needs, discussing the types of needs, factors that influence them, and gaps in supporting caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An unsystematic narrative review was performed to provide a broad overview of caregiver needs research. A targeted search was done on PubMed. Search terms included \"caregiver needs\", \"concerns\", \"experiences\", \"palliative\", \"hospice\", and \"end-of-life\". Qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews between January 2019 and November 2024. Selected papers were analysed to distil themes on the types of caregiver needs, as well as contextual factors and barriers that impact them. Assessment tools and processes were also included.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>A total of 63 papers were included. Major findings showed that caregivers often prioritize 'care-enabling needs'-such as information access and logistic support-over their personal 'direct support' needs-which encompasses the need for validation, recognition of their autonomy, and relational needs. While caregiver needs are increasingly appreciated, there remained substantial gaps in addressing them, the extent of which also varying due to contextual factors, such as patient's condition, availability of resources, and cultural norms. Barriers identified included ongoing prioritization of patient needs above self, suboptimal cultural sensitivity among providers, and general lack of needs assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In EOL care, it is critical that providers acknowledge that caregivers are essential partners and a co-client to the patient. There is a need to recognize caregivers' direct support alongside care-enabling needs to ensure caregivers' well-being are also looked after. More attention can be given to increasing the visibility of caregiver needs by developing sensitivity to contextual factors and implementing assessment processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Informal caregivers are essential to home-based end-of-life (EOL) care. However, their needs are often not well-understood and described in relation to caregiving, rather than with a 'caregiver-centric' perspective. This review aimed to provide an overview of research on EOL caregiver needs, discussing the types of needs, factors that influence them, and gaps in supporting caregivers.

Methods: An unsystematic narrative review was performed to provide a broad overview of caregiver needs research. A targeted search was done on PubMed. Search terms included "caregiver needs", "concerns", "experiences", "palliative", "hospice", and "end-of-life". Qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews between January 2019 and November 2024. Selected papers were analysed to distil themes on the types of caregiver needs, as well as contextual factors and barriers that impact them. Assessment tools and processes were also included.

Key content and findings: A total of 63 papers were included. Major findings showed that caregivers often prioritize 'care-enabling needs'-such as information access and logistic support-over their personal 'direct support' needs-which encompasses the need for validation, recognition of their autonomy, and relational needs. While caregiver needs are increasingly appreciated, there remained substantial gaps in addressing them, the extent of which also varying due to contextual factors, such as patient's condition, availability of resources, and cultural norms. Barriers identified included ongoing prioritization of patient needs above self, suboptimal cultural sensitivity among providers, and general lack of needs assessment tools.

Conclusions: In EOL care, it is critical that providers acknowledge that caregivers are essential partners and a co-client to the patient. There is a need to recognize caregivers' direct support alongside care-enabling needs to ensure caregivers' well-being are also looked after. More attention can be given to increasing the visibility of caregiver needs by developing sensitivity to contextual factors and implementing assessment processes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信