Xiao Liu, Yinkang Xu, Weifeng Sun, Naiqi Huang, Song Sun, Qiang Li, Dan Yang, Meng Yan
{"title":"Tab: template-aware bug report title generation via two-phase fine-tuned models","authors":"Xiao Liu, Yinkang Xu, Weifeng Sun, Naiqi Huang, Song Sun, Qiang Li, Dan Yang, Meng Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10515-025-00505-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bug reports play a critical role in the software development lifecycle by helping developers identify and resolve defects efficiently. However, the quality of bug report titles, particularly in open-source communities, can vary significantly, which complicates the bug triage and resolution processes. Existing approaches, such as iTAPE, treat title generation as a one-sentence summarization task using sequence-to-sequence models. While these methods show promise, they face two major limitations: (1) they do not consider the distinct components of bug reports, treating the entire report as a homogeneous input, and (2) they struggle to handle the variability between template-based and non-template-based reports, often resulting in suboptimal titles. To address these limitations, we propose <span>TAB</span>, a hybrid framework that combines a <i>Document Component Analyzer</i> based on a pre-trained BERT model and a <i>Title Generation Model</i> based on CodeT5. <span>TAB</span> addresses the first limitation by segmenting bug reports into four components-<i>Description</i>, <i>Reproduction</i>, <i>Expected Behavior</i>, and <i>Others</i>-to ensure better alignment between input and output. For the second limitation, <span>TAB</span> uses a divergent approach: for template-based reports, titles are generated directly, while for non-template reports, DCA extracts key components to improve title relevance and clarity. We evaluate <span>TAB</span> on both template-based and non-template-based bug reports, demonstrating that it significantly outperforms existing methods. Specifically, <span>TAB</span> achieves average improvements of 170.4–389.5% in METEOR, 67.8–190.0% in ROUGE-L, and 65.7–124.5% in chrF(AF) compared to baseline approaches on template-based reports. Additionally, on non-template-based reports, <span>TAB</span> shows an average improvement of 64% in METEOR, 3.6% in ROUGE-L, and 14.8% in chrF(AF) over the state-of-the-art. These results confirm the robustness of <span>TAB</span> in generating high-quality titles across diverse bug report formats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-025-00505-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bug reports play a critical role in the software development lifecycle by helping developers identify and resolve defects efficiently. However, the quality of bug report titles, particularly in open-source communities, can vary significantly, which complicates the bug triage and resolution processes. Existing approaches, such as iTAPE, treat title generation as a one-sentence summarization task using sequence-to-sequence models. While these methods show promise, they face two major limitations: (1) they do not consider the distinct components of bug reports, treating the entire report as a homogeneous input, and (2) they struggle to handle the variability between template-based and non-template-based reports, often resulting in suboptimal titles. To address these limitations, we propose TAB, a hybrid framework that combines a Document Component Analyzer based on a pre-trained BERT model and a Title Generation Model based on CodeT5. TAB addresses the first limitation by segmenting bug reports into four components-Description, Reproduction, Expected Behavior, and Others-to ensure better alignment between input and output. For the second limitation, TAB uses a divergent approach: for template-based reports, titles are generated directly, while for non-template reports, DCA extracts key components to improve title relevance and clarity. We evaluate TAB on both template-based and non-template-based bug reports, demonstrating that it significantly outperforms existing methods. Specifically, TAB achieves average improvements of 170.4–389.5% in METEOR, 67.8–190.0% in ROUGE-L, and 65.7–124.5% in chrF(AF) compared to baseline approaches on template-based reports. Additionally, on non-template-based reports, TAB shows an average improvement of 64% in METEOR, 3.6% in ROUGE-L, and 14.8% in chrF(AF) over the state-of-the-art. These results confirm the robustness of TAB in generating high-quality titles across diverse bug report formats.
期刊介绍:
This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes.
Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.