Review on the need for inventories and management of reservoirs of POPs and other persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic substances (PBTs) in the face of climate change

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Roland Weber, Lautaro Girones, Ulrich Förstner, Mats Tysklind, David Laner, Henner Hollert, Martin Forter, John Vijgen
{"title":"Review on the need for inventories and management of reservoirs of POPs and other persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic substances (PBTs) in the face of climate change","authors":"Roland Weber,&nbsp;Lautaro Girones,&nbsp;Ulrich Förstner,&nbsp;Mats Tysklind,&nbsp;David Laner,&nbsp;Henner Hollert,&nbsp;Martin Forter,&nbsp;John Vijgen","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01060-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Large quantities of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances (PBTs) like heavy metals have accumulated mainly over the last century in reservoirs, such as landfills, dump sites, contaminated sites, and mine tailings, as well as in environmental sinks like soils and sediments. Large floods in the past 20 years have demonstrated the mobilisation of POPs/PBTs from these reservoirs, underscoring the limitations of conventional technical safeguard measures like leachate and wastewater treatment or containment systems at landfills.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>This study emphasises the need to develop inventories of POPs/PBTs in these reservoirs for the assessment of future risk of increased flooding triggered by climate change and for priority setting of remediation and securing measures. Further, sea-level rise should be included in these assessments as long-term risk for large areas that are likely to be permanently flooded in the coming decades and centuries. In addition, the risk of release of POPs and other PBTs by industries affected by Natural Hazards Triggering Technological Accidents (Natech) should be globally evaluated. The review emphasises the importance of conducting systematic assessments and inventories to understand the risk of these reservoirs for environmental pollution and human exposure. The releases and remobilisation of POPs/PBTs can lead to higher levels in food and drinking water with increased human exposure. In addition to fish, it is crucial to consider livestock grazing in flood plains and other areas affected by floods, and to include them in inventories and risk management.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on these assessments, appropriate measures must be developed to eliminate or secure the respective reservoirs, following the precautionary approach. Whilst management measures have been initiated in affected areas (including affected feed/biomass), such as floodplains, there is a need to develop them more systematically. This review advocates for a comprehensive and precautionary approach to address the environmental challenges posed by climate change for POPs and other PBTs reservoirs, with an emphasis on increased flooding and sea-level rise. The substitution of POPs/PBTs in non-essential uses should be implemented to reduce future risks. A synergistic implementation of the Stockholm, Minimata, and Climate Convention can be used as frame for inventories and mitigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01060-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01060-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Large quantities of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances (PBTs) like heavy metals have accumulated mainly over the last century in reservoirs, such as landfills, dump sites, contaminated sites, and mine tailings, as well as in environmental sinks like soils and sediments. Large floods in the past 20 years have demonstrated the mobilisation of POPs/PBTs from these reservoirs, underscoring the limitations of conventional technical safeguard measures like leachate and wastewater treatment or containment systems at landfills.

Results

This study emphasises the need to develop inventories of POPs/PBTs in these reservoirs for the assessment of future risk of increased flooding triggered by climate change and for priority setting of remediation and securing measures. Further, sea-level rise should be included in these assessments as long-term risk for large areas that are likely to be permanently flooded in the coming decades and centuries. In addition, the risk of release of POPs and other PBTs by industries affected by Natural Hazards Triggering Technological Accidents (Natech) should be globally evaluated. The review emphasises the importance of conducting systematic assessments and inventories to understand the risk of these reservoirs for environmental pollution and human exposure. The releases and remobilisation of POPs/PBTs can lead to higher levels in food and drinking water with increased human exposure. In addition to fish, it is crucial to consider livestock grazing in flood plains and other areas affected by floods, and to include them in inventories and risk management.

Conclusion

Based on these assessments, appropriate measures must be developed to eliminate or secure the respective reservoirs, following the precautionary approach. Whilst management measures have been initiated in affected areas (including affected feed/biomass), such as floodplains, there is a need to develop them more systematically. This review advocates for a comprehensive and precautionary approach to address the environmental challenges posed by climate change for POPs and other PBTs reservoirs, with an emphasis on increased flooding and sea-level rise. The substitution of POPs/PBTs in non-essential uses should be implemented to reduce future risks. A synergistic implementation of the Stockholm, Minimata, and Climate Convention can be used as frame for inventories and mitigation.

审查面对气候变化对持久性有机污染物和其他持久性、生物积累性和有毒物质(PBTs)储存库进行清查和管理的必要性
上个世纪以来,大量持久性有机污染物(POPs)和其他持久性、生物蓄积性和有毒物质(PBTs),如重金属,主要积聚在诸如垃圾填埋场、垃圾场、受污染场地和矿山尾矿等水库以及土壤和沉积物等环境汇中。过去20年的大洪水表明,持久性有机污染物/多溴二苯醚从这些水库中被动员出来,这突出了传统技术保障措施的局限性,如渗滤液和废水处理或垃圾填埋场的密封系统。结果本研究强调有必要编制这些水库中持久性有机污染物/多溴联苯醚的清单,以评估气候变化引发洪水增加的未来风险,并确定修复和安全措施的优先事项。此外,海平面上升应该被纳入这些评估,作为未来几十年和几个世纪可能被永久淹没的大片地区的长期风险。此外,应对受自然灾害引发技术事故影响的行业释放持久性有机污染物和其他多溴联苯的风险进行全球评估。该审查强调进行系统评估和盘点的重要性,以了解这些水库对环境污染和人类接触的风险。持久性有机污染物/多溴联苯的释放和再活化可导致食物和饮用水中的含量升高,并增加人类接触。除鱼类外,至关重要的是要考虑洪泛区和其他受洪水影响地区的牲畜放牧问题,并将其纳入清单和风险管理。结论在此基础上,必须采取预防措施,制定相应的消除或保护水库的措施。虽然在受影响地区(包括受影响的饲料/生物量),例如洪泛平原,已经开始采取管理措施,但是需要更系统地发展这些措施。本综述主张采取全面和预防性的方法来应对气候变化对持久性有机污染物和其他多溴联苯储层构成的环境挑战,重点是洪水和海平面上升的增加。应实施非必要用途的持久性有机污染物/多溴联苯醚替代品,以减少未来的风险。协同执行《斯德哥尔摩公约》、《最低限度公约》和《气候公约》可作为清单和减缓框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信