Correlations of pilot trainees' brainwave dynamics with subjective performance evaluations: insights from EEG microstate analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Frontiers in neuroergonomics Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1472693
Mengting Zhao, Andrew Law, Chang Su, Sion Jennings, Alain Bourgon, Wenjun Jia, Marie-Hélène Larose, David Bowness, Yong Zeng
{"title":"Correlations of pilot trainees' brainwave dynamics with subjective performance evaluations: insights from EEG microstate analysis.","authors":"Mengting Zhao, Andrew Law, Chang Su, Sion Jennings, Alain Bourgon, Wenjun Jia, Marie-Hélène Larose, David Bowness, Yong Zeng","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1472693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the relationship between the subjective performance evaluations on pilot trainees' aircraft control abilities and their brainwave dynamics reflected in the results from EEG microstate analysis. Specifically, we seek to identify correlations between distinct microstate patterns and each dimension included in the subjective flight control evaluations, shedding light on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying aviation expertise and possible directions for future improvements in pilot training.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Proficiency in aircraft control is crucial for aviation safety and modern aviation where pilots need to maneuver aircraft through an array of situations, ranging from routine takeoffs and landings to complex weather conditions and emergencies. However, the neurophysiological aspects of aviation expertise remain largely unexplored. This research bridges the gap by examining the relationship between pilot trainees' specific brainwave patterns and their subjective evaluations of flight control levels, offering insights into the cognitive underpinnings of pilot skill efficiency and development.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>EEG microstate analysis was employed to examine the brainwave dynamics of pilot trainees while they performed aircraft control tasks under a flight simulator-based pilot training process. Trainees' control performance was evaluated by experienced instructors across five dimensions and their EEG data were analyzed to investigate the associations between the parameters of specific microstates with successful aircraft control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental results revealed significant associations between aircraft control levels and the parameters of distinct EEG microstates. Notably, these associations varied across control dimensions, highlighting the multifaceted nature of control proficiency. Noteworthy correlations included positive correlations between microstate class E and class G with aircraft control, emphasizing the role of attentional processes, perceptual integration, working memory, cognitive flexibility, decision-making, and executive control in aviation expertise. Conversely, negative correlations between microstate class C and class F with aircraft control indicated links between pilot trainees' cognitive control and their control performance on flight tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the multidimensional nature of aircraft control proficiency and emphasize the significance of attentional and cognitive processes in achieving aviation expertise. These neurophysiological markers offer a basis for designing targeted pilot training programs and interventions to enhance trainees' aircraft control skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":517413,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroergonomics","volume":"6 ","pages":"1472693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1472693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the relationship between the subjective performance evaluations on pilot trainees' aircraft control abilities and their brainwave dynamics reflected in the results from EEG microstate analysis. Specifically, we seek to identify correlations between distinct microstate patterns and each dimension included in the subjective flight control evaluations, shedding light on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying aviation expertise and possible directions for future improvements in pilot training.

Background: Proficiency in aircraft control is crucial for aviation safety and modern aviation where pilots need to maneuver aircraft through an array of situations, ranging from routine takeoffs and landings to complex weather conditions and emergencies. However, the neurophysiological aspects of aviation expertise remain largely unexplored. This research bridges the gap by examining the relationship between pilot trainees' specific brainwave patterns and their subjective evaluations of flight control levels, offering insights into the cognitive underpinnings of pilot skill efficiency and development.

Method: EEG microstate analysis was employed to examine the brainwave dynamics of pilot trainees while they performed aircraft control tasks under a flight simulator-based pilot training process. Trainees' control performance was evaluated by experienced instructors across five dimensions and their EEG data were analyzed to investigate the associations between the parameters of specific microstates with successful aircraft control.

Results: The experimental results revealed significant associations between aircraft control levels and the parameters of distinct EEG microstates. Notably, these associations varied across control dimensions, highlighting the multifaceted nature of control proficiency. Noteworthy correlations included positive correlations between microstate class E and class G with aircraft control, emphasizing the role of attentional processes, perceptual integration, working memory, cognitive flexibility, decision-making, and executive control in aviation expertise. Conversely, negative correlations between microstate class C and class F with aircraft control indicated links between pilot trainees' cognitive control and their control performance on flight tasks.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the multidimensional nature of aircraft control proficiency and emphasize the significance of attentional and cognitive processes in achieving aviation expertise. These neurophysiological markers offer a basis for designing targeted pilot training programs and interventions to enhance trainees' aircraft control skills.

飞行员受训者脑电波动态与主观绩效评价的相关性:来自脑电图微态分析的见解。
目的:探讨飞行员培训生飞机控制能力主观表现评价与脑电图微态分析结果所反映的脑波动力学之间的关系。具体来说,我们试图确定不同的微观状态模式与主观飞行控制评估中包含的每个维度之间的相关性,揭示航空专业知识背后的神经生理机制,并为飞行员培训的未来改进提供可能的方向。背景:熟练掌握飞机控制对航空安全和现代航空至关重要,飞行员需要在一系列情况下操纵飞机,从常规起飞和降落到复杂的天气条件和紧急情况。然而,航空专业知识的神经生理学方面在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究通过考察受训飞行员的特定脑电波模式与他们对飞行控制水平的主观评估之间的关系,弥合了这一差距,为飞行员技能效率和发展的认知基础提供了见解。方法:采用脑电微态分析方法,对飞行员训练过程中执行飞机控制任务时的脑电波动态进行研究。由经验丰富的教练员从五个维度评估学员的控制表现,并分析他们的脑电图数据,以研究特定微观状态参数与成功控制飞机之间的关系。结果:实验结果显示飞机控制水平与不同脑电微态参数之间存在显著相关性。值得注意的是,这些关联在控制维度上有所不同,突出了控制熟练度的多面性。值得注意的是,E类和G类微观状态与飞机控制之间存在正相关,强调了注意过程、知觉整合、工作记忆、认知灵活性、决策和执行控制在航空专业知识中的作用。相反,微状态C类和微状态F类与飞机控制之间存在负相关,表明受训飞行员认知控制与其飞行任务控制表现之间存在联系。结论:研究结果强调了飞机控制熟练程度的多维性,并强调了注意力和认知过程在获得航空专业知识方面的重要性。这些神经生理指标为设计有针对性的飞行员训练计划和干预措施提供了基础,以提高学员的飞机控制技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信