Effect of primary health care on hospitalizations: health services analysis based on Estonian data.

IF 1.7
Kaija Kasekamp, Andres Võrk, Ruth Kalda
{"title":"Effect of primary health care on hospitalizations: health services analysis based on Estonian data.","authors":"Kaija Kasekamp, Andres Võrk, Ruth Kalda","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625000222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the effect of primary health care (PHC) service provision continuity on inpatient admissions for people with chronic diseases in Estonia.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were collectively responsible for more than 7 out of 10 deaths worldwide in 2019. As the burden of NCDs increases, PHC has an increased role of coordinating care management. High-performing PHC can reduce unnecessary hospitalizations. Estonia has a strong PHC system focusing on multidisciplinary care. Yet it has not been evaluated for its effect on hospitalizations. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate PHC continuity to improve care for NCD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used routinely collected electronic medical billing data of the Estonian population aged 15 years or older from 2005 to 2020 identifying patients with seven ambulatory care sensitive chronic (ACSC) conditions. We developed an indicator to describe the continuity of PHC. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the impact of comorbidities and we controlled the patient's age, gender, county of residency and socio-economic status. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models with family doctor patient list random effects to assess how the odds of hospitalization depend on continuity of care, allowing for confounders.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified that 45% of the adult Estonian population had at least one of the target diagnoses. Among the target population, 96% had contact with their PHC providers. We found that there is a non-linear relationship between PHC continuity and patient outcomes. Any contact with PHC provider during the past 5 years decreases odds for hospitalization, but hospitalization risk is higher for people who are elderly and have higher CCI score. We found that after accounting for patient characteristics, differences among patient lists minimally impact outcomes. Further research should explore policies to better support family doctors in reducing hospitalizations for chronic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to assess the effect of primary health care (PHC) service provision continuity on inpatient admissions for people with chronic diseases in Estonia.

Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were collectively responsible for more than 7 out of 10 deaths worldwide in 2019. As the burden of NCDs increases, PHC has an increased role of coordinating care management. High-performing PHC can reduce unnecessary hospitalizations. Estonia has a strong PHC system focusing on multidisciplinary care. Yet it has not been evaluated for its effect on hospitalizations. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate PHC continuity to improve care for NCD patients.

Methods: This study used routinely collected electronic medical billing data of the Estonian population aged 15 years or older from 2005 to 2020 identifying patients with seven ambulatory care sensitive chronic (ACSC) conditions. We developed an indicator to describe the continuity of PHC. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the impact of comorbidities and we controlled the patient's age, gender, county of residency and socio-economic status. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models with family doctor patient list random effects to assess how the odds of hospitalization depend on continuity of care, allowing for confounders.

Findings: We identified that 45% of the adult Estonian population had at least one of the target diagnoses. Among the target population, 96% had contact with their PHC providers. We found that there is a non-linear relationship between PHC continuity and patient outcomes. Any contact with PHC provider during the past 5 years decreases odds for hospitalization, but hospitalization risk is higher for people who are elderly and have higher CCI score. We found that after accounting for patient characteristics, differences among patient lists minimally impact outcomes. Further research should explore policies to better support family doctors in reducing hospitalizations for chronic patients.

初级卫生保健对住院的影响:基于爱沙尼亚数据的卫生服务分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估初级卫生保健(PHC)服务提供连续性对爱沙尼亚慢性病患者住院的影响。背景:2019年,全球每10例死亡中就有7例以上是由非传染性疾病造成的。随着非传染性疾病负担的增加,初级保健在协调护理管理方面的作用越来越大。高效的初级保健可以减少不必要的住院。爱沙尼亚有一个强大的初级保健系统,侧重于多学科护理。然而,它对住院治疗的影响尚未得到评估。因此,评估初级保健的连续性以改善对非传染性疾病患者的护理是必要的。方法:本研究使用2005年至2020年期间爱沙尼亚15岁或以上人口的常规电子医疗账单数据,确定患有七种门诊护理敏感慢性(ACSC)疾病的患者。我们开发了一个指标来描述PHC的连续性。采用Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评估合并症的影响,并控制患者的年龄、性别、居住县和社会经济状况。我们估计了家庭医生患者名单随机效应的多水平逻辑回归模型,以评估住院的几率如何依赖于护理的连续性,允许混杂因素。研究结果:我们发现,45%的爱沙尼亚成年人至少有一种目标诊断。在目标人群中,96%的人与初级保健提供者有过接触。我们发现PHC连续性与患者预后之间存在非线性关系。在过去5年中与PHC提供者的任何接触都降低了住院的几率,但住院风险对于老年人和CCI评分较高的人更高。我们发现,在考虑了患者特征后,患者名单之间的差异对结果的影响最小。进一步的研究应探讨更好地支持家庭医生减少慢性病患者住院的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信