Increasing Academic Output through Quality Improvement Educational Strategies.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804
Hannah Stuart, Sangeeta Schroeder, Abbey Studer, Derek Wheeler, Jennifer Lavin, Caitlin Naureckas Li
{"title":"Increasing Academic Output through Quality Improvement Educational Strategies.","authors":"Hannah Stuart, Sangeeta Schroeder, Abbey Studer, Derek Wheeler, Jennifer Lavin, Caitlin Naureckas Li","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) work is imperative to support health systems in providing safe and effective care. Conflicting demands, including the need to complete standard work recognized for academic promotion, can hinder meaningful participation in QI work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our quaternary pediatric hospital, we completed a series of plan-do-study-act cycles around developing QI educational opportunities. Our outcome measure was the number of publications containing the phrase \"Quality Improvement\" with at least 1 author from our institution. Our process measures included the cumulative number of employees trained in QI methods or writing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of publications increased significantly from an average of 3.4 to 12.5 per quarter. The total number of employees trained in QI methods and QI writing increased throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A series of interventions designed to increase the QI fluency of our workforce were associated with an increase in the number of QI publications at our institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"10 2","pages":"e804"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quality improvement (QI) work is imperative to support health systems in providing safe and effective care. Conflicting demands, including the need to complete standard work recognized for academic promotion, can hinder meaningful participation in QI work.

Methods: At our quaternary pediatric hospital, we completed a series of plan-do-study-act cycles around developing QI educational opportunities. Our outcome measure was the number of publications containing the phrase "Quality Improvement" with at least 1 author from our institution. Our process measures included the cumulative number of employees trained in QI methods or writing.

Results: The number of publications increased significantly from an average of 3.4 to 12.5 per quarter. The total number of employees trained in QI methods and QI writing increased throughout the study period.

Conclusions: A series of interventions designed to increase the QI fluency of our workforce were associated with an increase in the number of QI publications at our institution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信