Neither private nor new: unpacking narratives of 'ocean privatisation'.

Maritime studies : MAST Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s40152-025-00416-1
Carlo Ceglia, Kimberley Peters, Philip Steinberg
{"title":"Neither private nor new: unpacking narratives of 'ocean privatisation'.","authors":"Carlo Ceglia, Kimberley Peters, Philip Steinberg","doi":"10.1007/s40152-025-00416-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Joining others who call attention to the ways in which the ocean, its spaces, and its resources are being commodified, enclosed, and extracted in ways that benefit some at the expense of others, this paper offers a synthesis and review, echoing and extending the cautions being posited around ocean privatisation discourses and their tendencies toward simplistic conceptualisations and presentist thinking that all too often limit critical analysis. Therefore, this paper synthesises and analyses existing literature on the institutions and processes through which the 'privatisation' of the ocean has been, and is being, implemented, leading to two important points. First, it is showed how privatisation processes are often more complex than the word suggests. Privatisation is anything but 'private'. The enclosure, appropriation, and rationalisation of space, resources, knowledge, and governance in the marine domain are occurring in institutional matrices where private actors operate in an array of relationships <i>with the state</i> (in its many, multiple guises), as well as non-governmental, and inter-governmental actors. Secondly, when viewing privatisation with a sensitivity to the array of institutions and actors involved, it is vital to recognise that what passes for a more recent capitalist tendency in the ocean realm rather continues long-standing, historical trajectories of violent extraction (which are equally complex in configuration). Expanding on these critiques, this paper turns to longstanding traditions that offer ways of thinking <i>beyond</i> privatisation and that engage the ocean not as a space of enclosure and extraction but as a space of relationality and livelihoods.</p>","PeriodicalId":74110,"journal":{"name":"Maritime studies : MAST","volume":"24 2","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime studies : MAST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-025-00416-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joining others who call attention to the ways in which the ocean, its spaces, and its resources are being commodified, enclosed, and extracted in ways that benefit some at the expense of others, this paper offers a synthesis and review, echoing and extending the cautions being posited around ocean privatisation discourses and their tendencies toward simplistic conceptualisations and presentist thinking that all too often limit critical analysis. Therefore, this paper synthesises and analyses existing literature on the institutions and processes through which the 'privatisation' of the ocean has been, and is being, implemented, leading to two important points. First, it is showed how privatisation processes are often more complex than the word suggests. Privatisation is anything but 'private'. The enclosure, appropriation, and rationalisation of space, resources, knowledge, and governance in the marine domain are occurring in institutional matrices where private actors operate in an array of relationships with the state (in its many, multiple guises), as well as non-governmental, and inter-governmental actors. Secondly, when viewing privatisation with a sensitivity to the array of institutions and actors involved, it is vital to recognise that what passes for a more recent capitalist tendency in the ocean realm rather continues long-standing, historical trajectories of violent extraction (which are equally complex in configuration). Expanding on these critiques, this paper turns to longstanding traditions that offer ways of thinking beyond privatisation and that engage the ocean not as a space of enclosure and extraction but as a space of relationality and livelihoods.

与其他呼吁关注海洋、海洋空间及其资源被商品化、封闭化和攫取的方式的人一样,本文对海洋私有化论述及其简单化概念化倾向和现时主义思维进行了综述和回顾,呼应并扩展了这些论述,这些论述往往限制了批判性分析。因此,本文综合并分析了有关海洋 "私有化 "已经和正在实施的机构和过程的现有文献,从而得出两个重要观点。首先,本文展示了私有化过程往往比 "私有化 "一词所暗示的更为复杂。私有化绝非 "私有"。海洋领域的空间、资源、知识和管理的圈占、占有和合理化都是在制度矩阵中进行的,在这些制度矩阵中,私人行为者与国家(以其多种多样的身份)、非政府行为者和政府间行为者建立了一系列关系。其次,在看待私有化问题时,要对所涉及的一系列机构和行为者保持敏感,必须认识到,海洋领域最近出现的资本主义趋势,延续了长期以来暴力开采的历史轨迹(其结构同样复杂)。本文在这些批判的基础上,转而探讨长期以来的传统,这些传统提供了超越私有化的思考方式,它们不是将海洋作为封闭和开采的空间,而是作为关系和生计的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信