Tiffany M Tang, Yuping Zhang, Ana M Kenney, Cassie Xie, Lanbo Xiao, Javed Siddiqui, Sudhir Srivastava, Martin G Sanda, John T Wei, Ziding Feng, Jeffrey J Tosoian, Yingye Zheng, Arul M Chinnaiyan, Bin Yu
{"title":"A simplified MyProstateScore2.0 for high-grade prostate cancer.","authors":"Tiffany M Tang, Yuping Zhang, Ana M Kenney, Cassie Xie, Lanbo Xiao, Javed Siddiqui, Sudhir Srivastava, Martin G Sanda, John T Wei, Ziding Feng, Jeffrey J Tosoian, Yingye Zheng, Arul M Chinnaiyan, Bin Yu","doi":"10.1177/18758592241308755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The limited diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has prompted innovative solutions, such as the state-of-the-art 18-gene urine test for clinically-significant PCa (MyProstateScore2.0 (MPS2)). <b>Objective:</b> We aim to develop a non-invasive biomarker test, the simplified MPS2 (sMPS2), which achieves similar state-of-the-art accuracy as MPS2 for predicting high-grade PCa but requires substantially fewer genes than the 18-gene MPS2 to improve its accessibility for routine clinical care. <b>Methods:</b> We grounded the development of sMPS2 in the Predictability, Computability, and Stability (PCS) framework for veridical data science. Under this framework, we stress-tested the development of sMPS2 across various data preprocessing and modeling choices and developed a stability-driven PCS ranking procedure for selecting the most predictive and robust genes for use in sMPS2. <b>Results:</b> The final sMPS2 model consisted of 7 genes and achieved a 0.784 AUROC (95% confidence interval, 0.742-0.825) for predicting high-grade PCa on a blinded external validation cohort. This is only 2.3% lower than the 18-gene MPS2, which is similar in magnitude to the 1-2% in uncertainty induced by different data preprocessing choices. <b>Conclusions:</b> The 7-gene sMPS2 provides a unique opportunity to expand the reach and adoption of non-invasive PCa screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":56320,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biomarkers","volume":"42 1","pages":"18758592241308755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758592241308755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The limited diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has prompted innovative solutions, such as the state-of-the-art 18-gene urine test for clinically-significant PCa (MyProstateScore2.0 (MPS2)). Objective: We aim to develop a non-invasive biomarker test, the simplified MPS2 (sMPS2), which achieves similar state-of-the-art accuracy as MPS2 for predicting high-grade PCa but requires substantially fewer genes than the 18-gene MPS2 to improve its accessibility for routine clinical care. Methods: We grounded the development of sMPS2 in the Predictability, Computability, and Stability (PCS) framework for veridical data science. Under this framework, we stress-tested the development of sMPS2 across various data preprocessing and modeling choices and developed a stability-driven PCS ranking procedure for selecting the most predictive and robust genes for use in sMPS2. Results: The final sMPS2 model consisted of 7 genes and achieved a 0.784 AUROC (95% confidence interval, 0.742-0.825) for predicting high-grade PCa on a blinded external validation cohort. This is only 2.3% lower than the 18-gene MPS2, which is similar in magnitude to the 1-2% in uncertainty induced by different data preprocessing choices. Conclusions: The 7-gene sMPS2 provides a unique opportunity to expand the reach and adoption of non-invasive PCa screening.
期刊介绍:
Concentrating on molecular biomarkers in cancer research, Cancer Biomarkers publishes original research findings (and reviews solicited by the editor) on the subject of the identification of markers associated with the disease processes whether or not they are an integral part of the pathological lesion.
The disease markers may include, but are not limited to, genomic, epigenomic, proteomics, cellular and morphologic, and genetic factors predisposing to the disease or indicating the occurrence of the disease. Manuscripts on these factors or biomarkers, either in altered forms, abnormal concentrations or with abnormal tissue distribution leading to disease causation will be accepted.