What do patients want from access to UK general practice?

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Helen Atherton, Helen Leach, Rob Mortell, Joanne Parsons
{"title":"What do patients want from access to UK general practice?","authors":"Helen Atherton, Helen Leach, Rob Mortell, Joanne Parsons","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to general practice is a topical concern, with rising numbers of consultations and decreasing numbers of general practitioners placing strain on the service. Patient satisfaction with general practice has seen a reduction in the UK. We sought to summarise the existing evidence about what patients want in relation to accessing general practice, to determine what is important to patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine what patients want from access to contemporary general practice in the UK.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review set in UK general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We included studies that reported patient wants in relation to access to general practice in the UK since 2010. All empirical study designs were included, both quantitative and qualitative. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used to assess study quality for contextual purposes. Narrative synthesis was applied to the included studies, with results presented using tables and text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 33 studies. The review showed that patients wanted information about how to access the general practice, choice of clinician, choice of healthcare professional type and choice of consultation mode. Patients wanted a nearby practice, with clean waiting rooms, easy appointment booking using simple systems and with short waiting times and to be kept informed about the process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The factors that patients want should be taken into consideration when changing or developing approaches to access. Future evaluations of care, and research, should explicitly consider what patients want from access in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to general practice is a topical concern, with rising numbers of consultations and decreasing numbers of general practitioners placing strain on the service. Patient satisfaction with general practice has seen a reduction in the UK. We sought to summarise the existing evidence about what patients want in relation to accessing general practice, to determine what is important to patients.

Aim: To examine what patients want from access to contemporary general practice in the UK.

Design and setting: Systematic review set in UK general practice.

Method: We included studies that reported patient wants in relation to access to general practice in the UK since 2010. All empirical study designs were included, both quantitative and qualitative. The mixed methods appraisal tool was used to assess study quality for contextual purposes. Narrative synthesis was applied to the included studies, with results presented using tables and text.

Results: We included 33 studies. The review showed that patients wanted information about how to access the general practice, choice of clinician, choice of healthcare professional type and choice of consultation mode. Patients wanted a nearby practice, with clean waiting rooms, easy appointment booking using simple systems and with short waiting times and to be kept informed about the process.

Conclusion: The factors that patients want should be taken into consideration when changing or developing approaches to access. Future evaluations of care, and research, should explicitly consider what patients want from access in general practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信