Low frequency of structured documentation for cancer genetic testing in a large electronic health record dataset: A brief report using All of Us Research data
Meghan L. Underhill, Xintong Li, Jaimin Shah, Caitlin Dreisbach
{"title":"Low frequency of structured documentation for cancer genetic testing in a large electronic health record dataset: A brief report using All of Us Research data","authors":"Meghan L. Underhill, Xintong Li, Jaimin Shah, Caitlin Dreisbach","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.2011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Annually, over two million individuals in the United States are diagnosed with cancer, with 10–20% attributed to hereditary cancer syndromes. Genetic testing for pathogenic variants is a standard component of cancer care guided by tumor pathology and family history. Despite this, access to and completion of cancer genetic testing remains suboptimal. This study aims to understand the rates and factors associated with genetic testing completion among individuals with cancer. Utilizing data from the All of Us Research Program, which includes over one million Americans, we examined the documentation of genetic testing in electronic health records. Participants diagnosed with breast, ovarian, colon, endometrial, or pancreatic cancer were selected using the All of Us Workbench cohort builder tool. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted within the integrated Jupyter Notebook. Out of 60,135 individuals with a diagnostic code for the eligible cancers, over 73% reported a family history of cancer. However, only 281 individuals had a diagnosis or procedural code for a cancer genetic test, with 82% completing the test post-cancer diagnosis. While the All of Us data is a robust resource for large-scale research, challenges in data acquisition and interpretation arise due to the reporting structure of genetic findings in most data sources, such as electronic health records. To effectively utilize large-scale data for addressing issues in cancer genetic testing, shared data elements and standardized documentation are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.2011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Annually, over two million individuals in the United States are diagnosed with cancer, with 10–20% attributed to hereditary cancer syndromes. Genetic testing for pathogenic variants is a standard component of cancer care guided by tumor pathology and family history. Despite this, access to and completion of cancer genetic testing remains suboptimal. This study aims to understand the rates and factors associated with genetic testing completion among individuals with cancer. Utilizing data from the All of Us Research Program, which includes over one million Americans, we examined the documentation of genetic testing in electronic health records. Participants diagnosed with breast, ovarian, colon, endometrial, or pancreatic cancer were selected using the All of Us Workbench cohort builder tool. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted within the integrated Jupyter Notebook. Out of 60,135 individuals with a diagnostic code for the eligible cancers, over 73% reported a family history of cancer. However, only 281 individuals had a diagnosis or procedural code for a cancer genetic test, with 82% completing the test post-cancer diagnosis. While the All of Us data is a robust resource for large-scale research, challenges in data acquisition and interpretation arise due to the reporting structure of genetic findings in most data sources, such as electronic health records. To effectively utilize large-scale data for addressing issues in cancer genetic testing, shared data elements and standardized documentation are essential.
大型电子健康记录数据集中癌症基因检测结构化文档的低频率:使用All of Us Research数据的简短报告。
每年,美国有超过200万人被诊断患有癌症,其中10-20%归因于遗传性癌症综合征。致病变异的基因检测是肿瘤病理和家族史指导下癌症护理的标准组成部分。尽管如此,癌症基因检测的普及和完成程度仍然不够理想。本研究旨在了解癌症患者完成基因检测的比率和相关因素。利用我们所有人研究计划的数据,其中包括超过一百万美国人,我们检查了电子健康记录中的基因检测文档。诊断为乳腺癌、卵巢癌、结肠癌、子宫内膜癌或胰腺癌的参与者使用All of Us Workbench队列构建工具进行选择。描述性和单变量分析在综合Jupyter Notebook中进行。在60135名具有符合条件的癌症诊断代码的个体中,超过73%的人报告有癌症家族史。然而,只有281人有癌症基因测试的诊断或程序代码,82%的人在癌症诊断后完成了测试。虽然“我们所有人”数据是大规模研究的有力资源,但由于大多数数据源(如电子健康记录)中遗传发现的报告结构,在数据获取和解释方面存在挑战。为了有效地利用大规模数据来解决癌症基因检测中的问题,共享数据元素和标准化文档是必不可少的。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.