Jeff Epstein, Bill Brinkman, Froehlich Tanya, Constance A Mara, John Simon, Andrew Beck, Suzanne Emmer
{"title":"Provider adoption of an online ADHD eHealth care application.","authors":"Jeff Epstein, Bill Brinkman, Froehlich Tanya, Constance A Mara, John Simon, Andrew Beck, Suzanne Emmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2562-1161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess what practice-, provider-, and patient population-level predictors predict adoption of an ADHD ehealth technology in community pediatric settings, pediatric providers nationwide were recruited and offered free use of an evidence-based mental-health-focused ehealth quality improvement intervention (mehealth for ADHD). Practice-, provider-, and patient population-level factors predicting provider's adoption of the intervention were studied. We hypothesized that providers who were younger, nearing re-credentialing, having more patients with ADHD, working at larger practices, serving socioeconomically deprived patient populations, and using an electronic health record (EHR) with mehealth integration would predict higher rates of adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A variety of recruitment strategies were attempted. Providers completed a baseline survey, were given free access to mehealth, and then had their software adoption recorded (i.e., account activation, rate of patients registered, completion of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles). Multiple regressions examined what practice-, provider-, and patient population-level variables predicted provider's adoption of the software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,612 providers at 813 practices across 48 states and the District of Columbia consented to the study. The most common ways that providers heard about the research study was through word-of-mouth (37%), advertising (23%), and through professional affiliation (11%). 1,210 (75.1%) providers activated their mehealth provider account and 446 (36.8%) registered at least 1 patient. Over 4.5 years, 21,804 patients were registered on the platform. Being able to access mehealth within their EHR predicted provider account activation, provider rate of patients registered, and the practice's completion of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. In addition, having a lower proportion of Medicaid patients predicted higher rates of patients being registered on the software.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Getting providers to consider, try, and adopt new evidence-based assistive technologies is challenging. Making ehealth software easier for providers' to access through EHR integration appears critical to adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2562-1161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess what practice-, provider-, and patient population-level predictors predict adoption of an ADHD ehealth technology in community pediatric settings, pediatric providers nationwide were recruited and offered free use of an evidence-based mental-health-focused ehealth quality improvement intervention (mehealth for ADHD). Practice-, provider-, and patient population-level factors predicting provider's adoption of the intervention were studied. We hypothesized that providers who were younger, nearing re-credentialing, having more patients with ADHD, working at larger practices, serving socioeconomically deprived patient populations, and using an electronic health record (EHR) with mehealth integration would predict higher rates of adoption.
Methods: A variety of recruitment strategies were attempted. Providers completed a baseline survey, were given free access to mehealth, and then had their software adoption recorded (i.e., account activation, rate of patients registered, completion of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles). Multiple regressions examined what practice-, provider-, and patient population-level variables predicted provider's adoption of the software.
Results: A total of 1,612 providers at 813 practices across 48 states and the District of Columbia consented to the study. The most common ways that providers heard about the research study was through word-of-mouth (37%), advertising (23%), and through professional affiliation (11%). 1,210 (75.1%) providers activated their mehealth provider account and 446 (36.8%) registered at least 1 patient. Over 4.5 years, 21,804 patients were registered on the platform. Being able to access mehealth within their EHR predicted provider account activation, provider rate of patients registered, and the practice's completion of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. In addition, having a lower proportion of Medicaid patients predicted higher rates of patients being registered on the software.
Conclusions: Getting providers to consider, try, and adopt new evidence-based assistive technologies is challenging. Making ehealth software easier for providers' to access through EHR integration appears critical to adoption.
目的:为了评估实践、提供者和患者群体水平的预测因子如何预测社区儿科环境中ADHD电子卫生技术的采用,招募了全国的儿科提供者,并免费使用以证据为基础的以心理健康为重点的电子卫生质量改善干预(mehealth for ADHD)。研究了预测提供者采用干预措施的实践、提供者和患者人群水平因素。我们假设,年轻、接近重新认证、有更多ADHD患者、在更大的诊所工作、服务于社会经济贫困的患者群体、使用电子健康记录(EHR)与mehealth整合的提供者将预测更高的采用率。方法:尝试多种招聘策略。供应商完成了一项基线调查,被允许免费访问mehealth,然后记录了他们的软件采用情况(即账户激活、患者注册率、计划-执行-研究-行动周期的完成情况)。多元回归检验了实践、提供者和患者群体水平变量预测提供者采用该软件的情况。结果:在48个州和哥伦比亚特区的813个实践中,共有1612名提供者同意了这项研究。供应商最常见的方式是通过口碑(37%),广告(23%)和专业关系(11%)。1210名(75.1%)提供者激活了他们的mehealth提供者帐户,446名(36.8%)至少注册了1名患者。在4.5年的时间里,该平台注册了21804名患者。能够在他们的电子病历中访问mehealth,可以预测提供者账户的激活、提供者注册患者的比率以及实践计划-执行-研究-行动周期的完成情况。此外,医疗补助患者比例越低,在该软件上注册的患者比例就越高。结论:让医疗服务提供者考虑、尝试和采用新的循证辅助技术是具有挑战性的。通过EHR集成,使供应商更容易访问电子健康软件,这对采用至关重要。
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.