Special Topic Burnout: Analyzing Physician In Basket Burden and Efficiency Using K-Means Clustering.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Vincent Lattanze, Xinyue Lan, Drew Vander Leest, Jasper Sim, Melissa Fazzari, Xianhong Xie, Sunit Jariwala
{"title":"Special Topic Burnout: Analyzing Physician In Basket Burden and Efficiency Using K-Means Clustering.","authors":"Vincent Lattanze, Xinyue Lan, Drew Vander Leest, Jasper Sim, Melissa Fazzari, Xianhong Xie, Sunit Jariwala","doi":"10.1055/a-2562-1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic health record (EHR) systems are essential for modern healthcare but contribute to significant documentation burden, affecting physician workflow and well-being. While previous studies have identified differences in EHR usage across demographics, systematic methods for identifying high-burden physician groups remain limited. This study applies cluster analysis to uncover distinct EHR usage profiles and provide a framework to inform the development of targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated two research questions: (1) Can cluster analysis effectively identify distinct physician EHR usage profiles? (2) How do these profiles vary across physician demographics and practice characteristics? We hypothesized that (1) EHR usage clusters would emerge based on workload intensity, after-hours documentation, and In Basket management patterns, and (2) would be significantly associated with physician experience, sex, and specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed outpatient EHR usage data from 323 physicians at an academic health system using Epic Signal, an analytical tool for Epic EHR. Using k-means clustering, we examined six metrics representing EHR workload (after-hours and extended-day activities) and In Basket efficiency (message handling and management patterns). We assessed cluster differences and conducted subgroup analyses by physician sex and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two distinct physician clusters emerged: one high-burden cluster, predominantly comprising experienced primary care physicians, and another lower-burden cluster, consisting mostly of younger specialists. Physicians in the high-burden cluster spent nearly three times as much time on after-hours documentation and In Basket management. While message response times remained similar, subgroup analyses revealed significant sex and specialty-based differences, particularly in the lower-burden cluster.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cluster analysis effectively identified distinct EHR usage patterns, highlighting disparities in workload by experience, sex, and specialty. This approach provides a scalable, data-driven method for health systems to identify at-risk groups and design targeted interventions to mitigate documentation burden and enhance EHR efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2562-1100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic health record (EHR) systems are essential for modern healthcare but contribute to significant documentation burden, affecting physician workflow and well-being. While previous studies have identified differences in EHR usage across demographics, systematic methods for identifying high-burden physician groups remain limited. This study applies cluster analysis to uncover distinct EHR usage profiles and provide a framework to inform the development of targeted interventions.

Objectives: This study investigated two research questions: (1) Can cluster analysis effectively identify distinct physician EHR usage profiles? (2) How do these profiles vary across physician demographics and practice characteristics? We hypothesized that (1) EHR usage clusters would emerge based on workload intensity, after-hours documentation, and In Basket management patterns, and (2) would be significantly associated with physician experience, sex, and specialty.

Methods: We analyzed outpatient EHR usage data from 323 physicians at an academic health system using Epic Signal, an analytical tool for Epic EHR. Using k-means clustering, we examined six metrics representing EHR workload (after-hours and extended-day activities) and In Basket efficiency (message handling and management patterns). We assessed cluster differences and conducted subgroup analyses by physician sex and specialty.

Results: Two distinct physician clusters emerged: one high-burden cluster, predominantly comprising experienced primary care physicians, and another lower-burden cluster, consisting mostly of younger specialists. Physicians in the high-burden cluster spent nearly three times as much time on after-hours documentation and In Basket management. While message response times remained similar, subgroup analyses revealed significant sex and specialty-based differences, particularly in the lower-burden cluster.

Conclusions: Cluster analysis effectively identified distinct EHR usage patterns, highlighting disparities in workload by experience, sex, and specialty. This approach provides a scalable, data-driven method for health systems to identify at-risk groups and design targeted interventions to mitigate documentation burden and enhance EHR efficiency.

专题倦怠:用k -均值聚类分析医师篮负荷和效率。
背景:电子健康记录(EHR)系统对现代医疗保健至关重要,但也造成了严重的文件负担,影响了医生的工作流程和福祉。虽然以前的研究已经确定了不同人口统计数据中电子病历使用的差异,但确定高负担医生群体的系统方法仍然有限。本研究应用聚类分析揭示不同的电子病历使用概况,并提供一个框架,以告知有针对性的干预措施的发展。目的:本研究探讨了两个研究问题:(1)聚类分析能否有效识别不同的医生电子病历使用概况?(2)这些资料在医生人口统计学和实践特征上有何不同?我们假设:(1)EHR使用集群将基于工作量强度、下班后文档和In Basket管理模式出现,(2)将与医生经验、性别和专业显著相关。方法:我们使用Epic EHR分析工具Epic Signal分析了学术卫生系统323名医生的门诊电子病历使用数据。使用k-means聚类,我们检查了代表EHR工作负载(下班后和延长一天的活动)和In Basket效率(消息处理和管理模式)的六个指标。我们评估了聚类差异,并按医生性别和专业进行了亚组分析。结果:出现了两个不同的医生集群:一个高负担集群,主要由经验丰富的初级保健医生组成,另一个低负担集群,主要由年轻的专家组成。高负担组的医生花在下班后文档和in Basket管理上的时间几乎是前者的三倍。虽然信息响应时间保持相似,但亚组分析显示了显著的性别和专业差异,特别是在负担较低的集群中。结论:聚类分析有效地识别了不同的电子病历使用模式,突出了不同经验、性别和专业的工作量差异。这种方法为卫生系统提供了一种可扩展的、数据驱动的方法,以确定高危人群并设计有针对性的干预措施,以减轻文件负担并提高电子病历效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信