Implementing and Evaluating Modified Record Reporting in Ohio.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of registry management Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Kaitlin R Kruger, Emily C Bunt
{"title":"Implementing and Evaluating Modified Record Reporting in Ohio.","authors":"Kaitlin R Kruger, Emily C Bunt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For many years, Ohio's hospitals experienced challenges related to state cancer reporting as they were unable to provide updated information after an abstract was initially submitted to the state central registry. For this reason, hospitals would hold their data to ensure they submitted the most complete and accurate data, especially for treatment. Ohio needed to find an automated method to receive updates for abstracts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020, the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) met with hospitals, hospital software vendors, and other state registries to investigate the option of collecting modified records (M-records). In 2021, OCISS completed an M-record pilot with a small subset of hospitals and began requiring M-records from all reporting hospitals in 2022. OCISS now has over a full years' experience processing M-record submissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OCISS has found creative solutions to overcome challenges, and M-record processing has become one of the standard tasks completed by OCISS. While the overall registry volume increased due to M-record reporting, the workload of the central registry did not. Additionally, Ohio hospitals expressed appreciation for being able to provide updated information and no longer needing to hold on to their abstract until treatment is completed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>M-record reporting has improved Ohio's registry operations. Ohio's cancer data is more complete and is reported more quickly. Implementing M-record reporting was challenging; however, as data timeliness becomes increasingly important, Ohio is well positioned to improve cancer reporting timeliness by leveraging M-record reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":39246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of registry management","volume":"51 4","pages":"167-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of registry management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For many years, Ohio's hospitals experienced challenges related to state cancer reporting as they were unable to provide updated information after an abstract was initially submitted to the state central registry. For this reason, hospitals would hold their data to ensure they submitted the most complete and accurate data, especially for treatment. Ohio needed to find an automated method to receive updates for abstracts.

Methods: In 2020, the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) met with hospitals, hospital software vendors, and other state registries to investigate the option of collecting modified records (M-records). In 2021, OCISS completed an M-record pilot with a small subset of hospitals and began requiring M-records from all reporting hospitals in 2022. OCISS now has over a full years' experience processing M-record submissions.

Results: OCISS has found creative solutions to overcome challenges, and M-record processing has become one of the standard tasks completed by OCISS. While the overall registry volume increased due to M-record reporting, the workload of the central registry did not. Additionally, Ohio hospitals expressed appreciation for being able to provide updated information and no longer needing to hold on to their abstract until treatment is completed.

Discussion: M-record reporting has improved Ohio's registry operations. Ohio's cancer data is more complete and is reported more quickly. Implementing M-record reporting was challenging; however, as data timeliness becomes increasingly important, Ohio is well positioned to improve cancer reporting timeliness by leveraging M-record reporting.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of registry management
Journal of registry management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信