Ascertainment of Hepatitis B and C Infection from Linked Data Sources for Residents of New York City Diagnosed with Liver or Intrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of registry management Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Margaret Gates Kuliszewski, Baozhen Qiao, Xiuling Zhang, Holly Anger, Maria J Schymura, Tabassum Insaf
{"title":"Ascertainment of Hepatitis B and C Infection from Linked Data Sources for Residents of New York City Diagnosed with Liver or Intrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.","authors":"Margaret Gates Kuliszewski, Baozhen Qiao, Xiuling Zhang, Holly Anger, Maria J Schymura, Tabassum Insaf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic infection with hepatitis B or C substantially increases risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, central cancer registries do not routinely collect information on hepatitis diagnoses. We evaluated the extent to which information on hepatitis B or C diagnosis could be ascertained from linked external data sources for cancers reported to the New York State Cancer Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked data for 14,747 New York City (NYC) residents diagnosed with liver or intrahepatic bile duct cancer during 2004-2018 to 2 data sources: (1) the NYC Viral Hepatitis Surveillance Registry, which collects information on reported probable and confirmed cases of hepatitis B and C from New York laboratories and health care providers, and (2) the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), which captures hepatitis diagnosis codes from hospital inpatient stays and outpatient encounters. We determined whether documentation of hepatitis B or C was present in 1 or both data sources, assessed concordance between the data sources, and used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to examine factors associated with discordance in hepatitis positivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 14,747 cancer cases included, 3,972 had documentation in either data source of hepatitis B (26.9%), 7,599 had documentation of hepatitis C (51.5%), and 9,753 had either diagnosis (66.1%). There was moderate to substantial agreement between the 2 data sources. The percent of NYC patients with any unrecorded hepatitis infection was 12.7% for the hepatitis registry and 7.8% for SPARCS, and discordance in hepatitis positivity was more common in certain individuals, including those aged ≥70 years at cancer diagnosis and those with intrahepatic bile duct cancer, Hispanic ethnicity (hepatitis registry only), and Black or Asian race (SPARCS only).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that hospital discharge and public health surveillance data can be used to assess individual-level hepatitis B and C infection status in people diagnosed with liver cancer. Possible reasons for discrepancies between the data sources include incomplete reporting in the hepatitis registry, especially for earlier diagnosis years, differing case inclusion criteria, and differences in the linkage methods for the 2 data sources. This information can be used to enrich cancer registry data for epidemiologic analyses of hepatocellular carcinoma and other cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of registry management","volume":"51 4","pages":"146-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of registry management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic infection with hepatitis B or C substantially increases risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, central cancer registries do not routinely collect information on hepatitis diagnoses. We evaluated the extent to which information on hepatitis B or C diagnosis could be ascertained from linked external data sources for cancers reported to the New York State Cancer Registry.

Methods: We linked data for 14,747 New York City (NYC) residents diagnosed with liver or intrahepatic bile duct cancer during 2004-2018 to 2 data sources: (1) the NYC Viral Hepatitis Surveillance Registry, which collects information on reported probable and confirmed cases of hepatitis B and C from New York laboratories and health care providers, and (2) the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), which captures hepatitis diagnosis codes from hospital inpatient stays and outpatient encounters. We determined whether documentation of hepatitis B or C was present in 1 or both data sources, assessed concordance between the data sources, and used multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to examine factors associated with discordance in hepatitis positivity.

Results: Of the 14,747 cancer cases included, 3,972 had documentation in either data source of hepatitis B (26.9%), 7,599 had documentation of hepatitis C (51.5%), and 9,753 had either diagnosis (66.1%). There was moderate to substantial agreement between the 2 data sources. The percent of NYC patients with any unrecorded hepatitis infection was 12.7% for the hepatitis registry and 7.8% for SPARCS, and discordance in hepatitis positivity was more common in certain individuals, including those aged ≥70 years at cancer diagnosis and those with intrahepatic bile duct cancer, Hispanic ethnicity (hepatitis registry only), and Black or Asian race (SPARCS only).

Conclusions: These results indicate that hospital discharge and public health surveillance data can be used to assess individual-level hepatitis B and C infection status in people diagnosed with liver cancer. Possible reasons for discrepancies between the data sources include incomplete reporting in the hepatitis registry, especially for earlier diagnosis years, differing case inclusion criteria, and differences in the linkage methods for the 2 data sources. This information can be used to enrich cancer registry data for epidemiologic analyses of hepatocellular carcinoma and other cancers.

从关联数据源确定纽约市被诊断为肝脏或肝内胆管癌的居民的乙型和丙型肝炎感染。
背景:慢性乙型或丙型肝炎感染显著增加肝细胞癌的风险。然而,中央癌症登记处不定期收集肝炎诊断信息。我们评估了从纽约州癌症登记处报告的癌症相关外部数据源中确定乙型或丙型肝炎诊断信息的程度。方法:我们将2004-2018年期间诊断为肝脏或肝内胆管癌的14,747名纽约市(NYC)居民的数据与2个数据源相关联:(1)纽约市病毒性肝炎监测登记处,收集来自纽约实验室和卫生保健提供者的乙型和丙型肝炎报告可能和确诊病例的信息;(2)纽约州范围内的规划和研究合作系统(SPARCS),从医院住院和门诊就诊中获取肝炎诊断代码。我们确定在一个或两个数据源中是否存在乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎的文献,评估数据源之间的一致性,并使用多变量调整逻辑回归来检查与肝炎阳性不一致相关的因素。结果:在纳入的14747例癌症病例中,3972例(26.9%)在任何数据源中都有乙型肝炎的记录,7599例(51.5%)有丙型肝炎的记录,9753例(66.1%)有两种诊断。这两个数据来源之间存在中度到实质性的一致。纽约市未记录肝炎感染的患者百分比在肝炎登记中为12.7%,在SPARCS中为7.8%,并且肝炎阳性的不一致在某些个体中更为常见,包括癌症诊断时年龄≥70岁和肝内胆管癌,西班牙裔(仅肝炎登记)和黑人或亚洲种族(仅SPARCS)。结论:这些结果表明,出院和公共卫生监测数据可用于评估肝癌确诊患者个体水平的乙型和丙型肝炎感染状况。数据来源之间存在差异的可能原因包括肝炎登记报告不完整,特别是早期诊断年份,不同的病例纳入标准,以及两个数据来源的关联方法不同。这些信息可用于丰富肝癌和其他癌症的流行病学分析的癌症登记数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of registry management
Journal of registry management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信