Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.2196/64809
Jane A McElroy, Jamie B Smith, Kevin D Everett
{"title":"Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Jane A McElroy, Jamie B Smith, Kevin D Everett","doi":"10.2196/64809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Compelling evidence shows screening detects colorectal cancer (CRC) at earlier stages and prevents the development of CRC through the removal of precancerous polyps. The Healthy People 2030 goal for CRC screening is 68.3%, but only 36.5% of Missouri federally qualified health center patients aged 50-75 years are up-to-date on CRC screening. For average risk patients, there are three commonly used screening tests in the United States-two types of stool tests collected at home (fecal immunochemical test [FIT]-immunochemical fecal occult blood test [FOBT] and FIT-DNA, such as Cologuard) and colonoscopies completed at procedural centers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to examine variation by month for the three types of CRC testing to evaluate consistent patient care by clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 31 federally qualified health center clinics in Missouri from 2011 to 2023 were analyzed. A sample of 34,124 unique eligible \"average risk\" patients defined as persons not having a personal history of CRC or certain types of polyps, family history of CRC, personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, and personal history of receiving radiation to the abdomen or pelvic to treat a previous cancer or confirmed or suspected hereditary CRC syndrome. Another eligibility criterion is that patients need to be seen at least once at the clinic to be included in the denominator for the screening rate calculation. Descriptive statistics characterize the sample, while bivariate analyses assess differences in screening types by month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completion of CRC screening yielded statistically significant differences for patients completing the different types of CRC screening by month. October-January had the highest proportions of patients (644-680 per month, 8.5%-10.2%) receiving a colonoscopy, while February-April had the lowest (509-578 per month, 6.9%-7.8%), with 614 being the average monthly number of colonoscopies. For FIT-FOBT, June-August had the higher proportions of patients receiving this test (563-613 per month, 8.9%-9.6%), whereas December-February had the lowest (453-495 per month, 7.1%-8%), with 541 being the average monthly number of FIT-FOBT kits used. For FIT-DNA, March was the most popular month with 11.3% (n=261 per month) of patients using the Cologuard test, followed by April, May, and November (207-220 per month, 8.7%-9.4%), and January and June (168-171 per month, 7.2%-7.3%) had the lowest proportion of patients using Cologuard, with 193 being the average monthly number of FIT-DNA kits used. Combining all tests, February had the fewest CRC tests completed (1153/16,173, 7.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Home-based tests are becoming popular, replacing the gold standard colonoscopy, but need to be repeated more frequently. Monthly variation of screening over the course of a year suggests that CRC screening efforts and patient care may be less than ideal. Months with lower rates of screening for each type of CRC test represent opportunities for improving CRC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e64809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Compelling evidence shows screening detects colorectal cancer (CRC) at earlier stages and prevents the development of CRC through the removal of precancerous polyps. The Healthy People 2030 goal for CRC screening is 68.3%, but only 36.5% of Missouri federally qualified health center patients aged 50-75 years are up-to-date on CRC screening. For average risk patients, there are three commonly used screening tests in the United States-two types of stool tests collected at home (fecal immunochemical test [FIT]-immunochemical fecal occult blood test [FOBT] and FIT-DNA, such as Cologuard) and colonoscopies completed at procedural centers.

Objective: This study aims to examine variation by month for the three types of CRC testing to evaluate consistent patient care by clinical staff.

Methods: Data from 31 federally qualified health center clinics in Missouri from 2011 to 2023 were analyzed. A sample of 34,124 unique eligible "average risk" patients defined as persons not having a personal history of CRC or certain types of polyps, family history of CRC, personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, and personal history of receiving radiation to the abdomen or pelvic to treat a previous cancer or confirmed or suspected hereditary CRC syndrome. Another eligibility criterion is that patients need to be seen at least once at the clinic to be included in the denominator for the screening rate calculation. Descriptive statistics characterize the sample, while bivariate analyses assess differences in screening types by month.

Results: Completion of CRC screening yielded statistically significant differences for patients completing the different types of CRC screening by month. October-January had the highest proportions of patients (644-680 per month, 8.5%-10.2%) receiving a colonoscopy, while February-April had the lowest (509-578 per month, 6.9%-7.8%), with 614 being the average monthly number of colonoscopies. For FIT-FOBT, June-August had the higher proportions of patients receiving this test (563-613 per month, 8.9%-9.6%), whereas December-February had the lowest (453-495 per month, 7.1%-8%), with 541 being the average monthly number of FIT-FOBT kits used. For FIT-DNA, March was the most popular month with 11.3% (n=261 per month) of patients using the Cologuard test, followed by April, May, and November (207-220 per month, 8.7%-9.4%), and January and June (168-171 per month, 7.2%-7.3%) had the lowest proportion of patients using Cologuard, with 193 being the average monthly number of FIT-DNA kits used. Combining all tests, February had the fewest CRC tests completed (1153/16,173, 7.1%).

Conclusions: Home-based tests are becoming popular, replacing the gold standard colonoscopy, but need to be repeated more frequently. Monthly variation of screening over the course of a year suggests that CRC screening efforts and patient care may be less than ideal. Months with lower rates of screening for each type of CRC test represent opportunities for improving CRC screening.

密苏里州联邦合格健康中心患者结直肠癌筛查试验的月度变化:质量改进项目。
背景:癌症是美国第二大死因。令人信服的证据表明,筛查可以在早期阶段发现结直肠癌(CRC),并通过切除癌前息肉来预防结直肠癌的发展。健康人群2030的CRC筛查目标是68.3%,但密苏里州联邦政府认可的50-75岁的健康中心患者中,只有36.5%的人接受了最新的CRC筛查。对于平均风险的患者,在美国有三种常用的筛查试验——两种在家收集的粪便试验(粪便免疫化学试验[FIT]-免疫化学粪便潜血试验[FOBT]和FIT- dna,如Cologuard)和在手术中心完成的结肠镜检查。目的:本研究的目的是检查月度变化的三种类型的CRC检测,以评估一致的病人护理的临床工作人员。方法:对2011年至2023年密苏里州31家联邦合格卫生中心诊所的数据进行分析。34,124例独特符合条件的“平均风险”患者的样本,定义为没有个人结直肠癌病史或某些类型的息肉,结直肠癌家族史,炎症性肠病个人病史,接受腹部或盆腔放射治疗既往癌症或确诊或疑似遗传性结直肠癌综合征的个人病史。另一个合格标准是,患者需要至少在诊所见过一次,才能被纳入筛查率计算的分母。描述性统计描述了样本的特征,而双变量分析评估了按月筛选类型的差异。结果:按月完成不同类型CRC筛查的患者CRC筛查完成率差异有统计学意义。10 -1月接受结肠镜检查的患者比例最高(644-680 /月,8.5%-10.2%),2 - 4月最低(509-578 /月,6.9%-7.8%),平均每月结肠镜检查次数为614次。对于FIT-FOBT, 6 -8月接受该检测的患者比例较高(每月563-613例,8.9%-9.6%),而12 - 2月最低(每月453-495例,7.1%-8%),使用FIT-FOBT试剂盒的平均月数量为541例。对于FIT-DNA, 3月是使用Cologuard测试的患者最多的月份,11.3% (n=261 /月),其次是4月、5月和11月(207-220 /月,8.7%-9.4%),1月和6月(168-171 /月,7.2%-7.3%)使用Cologuard测试的患者比例最低,每月使用FIT-DNA试剂盒的平均数量为193。综合所有检查,2月完成的CRC检查最少(1153/16,173,7.1%)。结论:家庭检查正逐渐流行,取代了金标准结肠镜检查,但需要更频繁地重复。在一年的时间里,每月筛查的变化表明CRC筛查的努力和患者护理可能不太理想。每种类型CRC检查的筛查率较低的月份代表着改善CRC筛查的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信