Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined With Serratus Anterior Plane Block or Erector Spinae Block Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S507154
Meng-Meng Zheng, Jue Xie, Wei Tan, Cong-Wang Yuan, Dun-Yi Qi, Jie Sun
{"title":"Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined With Serratus Anterior Plane Block or Erector Spinae Block Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.","authors":"Meng-Meng Zheng, Jue Xie, Wei Tan, Cong-Wang Yuan, Dun-Yi Qi, Jie Sun","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S507154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and thoracic paravertebral combined with serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) or erector spinae block (ESPB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy(VATL).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 295 patients who underwent VATL surgery between August 2021 and January 2023. Patients were divided into three groups: TPVB (92 patients), TPVB combined with SAPB (106 patients), and TPVB combined with ESPB (97 patients). The primary outcomes were postoperative pain levels, measured using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) both at rest and during coughing at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, as well as cumulative oxycodone consumption within 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative cumulative oxycodone consumption within 24 and 48 hours was significantly lower in the TPVB+SAPB and TPVB+ESPB groups compared to the TPVB group (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with no significant difference between the TPVB+SAPB and TPVB+ESPB groups. The TPVB group exhibited higher VAS pain scores both at rest and during coughing at 2 and 6 hours postoperatively compared to the other two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.005). Within 24 hours postoperatively, the Area Under Curve (AUC) for VAS scores at rest was significantly lower in the TPVB+SAPB group than in the other two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05), while the AUC for coughing pain was significantly lower in the TPVB+ESPB group compared to the TPVB group (<i>P</i> = 0.049). Nausea or vomiting occurred more frequently in the TPVB group compared to the other groups (<i>P</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPVB combined with SAPB or ESPB provides superior analgesic effects compared to TPVB alone after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, with both techniques showing comparable analgesic efficacy. However, TPVB+SAPB may offer slightly better analgesia at rest, while TPVB+ESPB may have a potential advantage in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"343-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S507154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and thoracic paravertebral combined with serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) or erector spinae block (ESPB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy(VATL).

Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 295 patients who underwent VATL surgery between August 2021 and January 2023. Patients were divided into three groups: TPVB (92 patients), TPVB combined with SAPB (106 patients), and TPVB combined with ESPB (97 patients). The primary outcomes were postoperative pain levels, measured using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) both at rest and during coughing at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, as well as cumulative oxycodone consumption within 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.

Results: Postoperative cumulative oxycodone consumption within 24 and 48 hours was significantly lower in the TPVB+SAPB and TPVB+ESPB groups compared to the TPVB group (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between the TPVB+SAPB and TPVB+ESPB groups. The TPVB group exhibited higher VAS pain scores both at rest and during coughing at 2 and 6 hours postoperatively compared to the other two groups (P < 0.005). Within 24 hours postoperatively, the Area Under Curve (AUC) for VAS scores at rest was significantly lower in the TPVB+SAPB group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05), while the AUC for coughing pain was significantly lower in the TPVB+ESPB group compared to the TPVB group (P = 0.049). Nausea or vomiting occurred more frequently in the TPVB group compared to the other groups (P = 0.016).

Conclusion: TPVB combined with SAPB or ESPB provides superior analgesic effects compared to TPVB alone after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, with both techniques showing comparable analgesic efficacy. However, TPVB+SAPB may offer slightly better analgesia at rest, while TPVB+ESPB may have a potential advantage in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信