Local-region treatment comparison following conversion therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: a period and age-dependent analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251316665
Jiahui Hu, Shu Zhao, Mengxuan Zuo, Chun Hui Li, Wang Yao, Xinyu Yang, WeiWei Xing, Peng Song
{"title":"Local-region treatment comparison following conversion therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: a period and age-dependent analysis.","authors":"Jiahui Hu, Shu Zhao, Mengxuan Zuo, Chun Hui Li, Wang Yao, Xinyu Yang, WeiWei Xing, Peng Song","doi":"10.1177/17588359251316665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a potential conversion therapeutic strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, therapeutic options following conversion therapy are still controversial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) and microwave ablation (MWA) after TACE conversion therapy for uHCC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective, multi-institutional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2008 to October 2022, 8842 consecutive uHCC patients underwent initial TACE at 15 hospitals were identified. Among them, 1348 eligible patients who received TACE conversion therapy were included. The propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias. To explore the effect of age on conversion therapy, a therapeutic factor analysis with age change was performed. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM 1:1, 542 patients in the MWA group were matched with those in the SR group. SR demonstrated better long-term survival outcomes (median OS, 10.6 vs 5.8 years, HR:1.83, 95% CI: 1.48-2.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and median DFS, 3.2 vs 2.5 years, HR: 1.27, 95% CI:1.09-1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.003) than MWA. There was an improvement in the 5-year DFS rate for MWA from 17.1% during 2009-2016 to 37.3% during 2017-2022, becoming comparable to the 40.8% of SR (<i>p</i> = 0.129). When the uHCC patients downstage met Milan criteria, the long-term OS and DFS were comparable between two groups (both, <i>p</i> > 0.05). SR presents an OS advantage over MWA at the age (years) of 45-54 (<i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.036), 55-65 (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and >65 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), except <45(<i>p</i> = 0.140).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MWA might be acceptable as an alternative to SR in first-line therapeutic scheme after TACE conversion therapy for uHCC, especially, for the aged <45 years cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251316665"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251316665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a potential conversion therapeutic strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, therapeutic options following conversion therapy are still controversial.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) and microwave ablation (MWA) after TACE conversion therapy for uHCC.

Design: A retrospective, multi-institutional study.

Methods: From June 2008 to October 2022, 8842 consecutive uHCC patients underwent initial TACE at 15 hospitals were identified. Among them, 1348 eligible patients who received TACE conversion therapy were included. The propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias. To explore the effect of age on conversion therapy, a therapeutic factor analysis with age change was performed. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.

Results: After PSM 1:1, 542 patients in the MWA group were matched with those in the SR group. SR demonstrated better long-term survival outcomes (median OS, 10.6 vs 5.8 years, HR:1.83, 95% CI: 1.48-2.25, p < 0.001 and median DFS, 3.2 vs 2.5 years, HR: 1.27, 95% CI:1.09-1.49, p = 0.003) than MWA. There was an improvement in the 5-year DFS rate for MWA from 17.1% during 2009-2016 to 37.3% during 2017-2022, becoming comparable to the 40.8% of SR (p = 0.129). When the uHCC patients downstage met Milan criteria, the long-term OS and DFS were comparable between two groups (both, p > 0.05). SR presents an OS advantage over MWA at the age (years) of 45-54 (p= 0.036), 55-65 (p = 0.001), and >65 (p < 0.001), except <45(p = 0.140).

Conclusion: MWA might be acceptable as an alternative to SR in first-line therapeutic scheme after TACE conversion therapy for uHCC, especially, for the aged <45 years cohorts.

肝细胞癌转化治疗后局部区域治疗比较:时期和年龄依赖性分析。
背景:经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)是不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)的潜在转化治疗策略。然而,转换治疗后的治疗选择仍然存在争议。目的:本研究旨在比较TACE转化治疗uHCC后手术切除(SR)和微波消融(MWA)的疗效和安全性。设计:回顾性、多机构研究。方法:从2008年6月到2022年10月,在15家医院连续8842例hcc患者接受了首次TACE治疗。其中纳入1348例接受TACE转化治疗的符合条件的患者。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)来减少选择偏差。为了探讨年龄对转换治疗的影响,我们进行了年龄变化的治疗因素分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验比较总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:经1:1 PSM后,MWA组542例患者与SR组匹配。SR比MWA表现出更好的长期生存结果(中位OS, 10.6 vs 5.8年,HR:1.83, 95% CI: 1.48-2.25, p = 0.003)。MWA的5年DFS率从2009-2016年的17.1%提高到2017-2022年的37.3%,与SR的40.8%相当(p = 0.129)。当晚期hcc患者达到米兰标准时,两组间的长期OS和DFS具有可比性(均p < 0.05)。SR在45-54岁(p = 0.036)、55-65岁(p = 0.001)和bbb65岁(p = 0.140)时比MWA表现出OS优势。结论:uHCC TACE转换治疗后,MWA可作为一线治疗方案中SR的替代方案,特别是对于老年人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信