Effect of Deregulation of the Brazilian National Controlled Products Management System on Antidepressants' Sales Data Deregulation of a Brazilian Drug Electronic System.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Vanessa Gomes Lima, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Tayanny Margarida Menezes Almeida Biase, Taís Freire Galvão
{"title":"Effect of Deregulation of the Brazilian National Controlled Products Management System on Antidepressants' Sales Data Deregulation of a Brazilian Drug Electronic System.","authors":"Vanessa Gomes Lima, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Tayanny Margarida Menezes Almeida Biase, Taís Freire Galvão","doi":"10.1002/pds.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effect of deregulating the national sales reporting system on Brazilian pharmacoepidemiologic data on antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a time series analysis to assess the trends in antidepressant sales in Brazilian drugstores from January 2014 to December 2022 using the Brazilian National Controlled Products Management System (SNGPC) and to predict sales records for 2022 after the deregulation of the mandatory record in December 2021. Antidepressant sales were converted to defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). The seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) was used to predict sales records for 2022. All analyses were conducted in Stata v.14.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sales of patients taking antidepressants increased significantly from 2014 (mean: 14.7 DID/month) to 2020 (mean: 33.5 DID/month; β = 0.231; p < 0.001). After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the increasing trend continued, but the change was not significant (β = 0.330; p = 0.130). After the deregulation, a sharp decrease was observed (β = -1.032; p < 0.001). The monthly antidepressant sales forecasted for 2022 were 36.5 DID, while the observed value was 2.5 DID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deregulation of SNGPC registration significantly decreased the number of antidepressant sales records. This measure affected the availability of pharmacoepidemiological data and research in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 3","pages":"e70136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of deregulating the national sales reporting system on Brazilian pharmacoepidemiologic data on antidepressants.

Methods: This was a time series analysis to assess the trends in antidepressant sales in Brazilian drugstores from January 2014 to December 2022 using the Brazilian National Controlled Products Management System (SNGPC) and to predict sales records for 2022 after the deregulation of the mandatory record in December 2021. Antidepressant sales were converted to defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). The seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) was used to predict sales records for 2022. All analyses were conducted in Stata v.14.2.

Results: Sales of patients taking antidepressants increased significantly from 2014 (mean: 14.7 DID/month) to 2020 (mean: 33.5 DID/month; β = 0.231; p < 0.001). After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the increasing trend continued, but the change was not significant (β = 0.330; p = 0.130). After the deregulation, a sharp decrease was observed (β = -1.032; p < 0.001). The monthly antidepressant sales forecasted for 2022 were 36.5 DID, while the observed value was 2.5 DID.

Conclusion: Deregulation of SNGPC registration significantly decreased the number of antidepressant sales records. This measure affected the availability of pharmacoepidemiological data and research in Brazil.

巴西国家管制产品管理系统放松管制对抗抑郁药销售数据的影响
目的:评估取消全国销售报告制度对巴西抗抑郁药物流行病学数据的影响。方法:采用时间序列分析方法,利用巴西国家管制产品管理系统(SNGPC)评估2014年1月至2022年12月巴西药店抗抑郁药销售趋势,并预测2021年12月强制性记录解除后2022年的销售记录。抗抑郁药的销售被转换为每日每1000名居民(DID)的限定日剂量。使用季节性自回归综合移动平均线(SARIMA)预测2022年的销售记录。所有分析均在Stata v.14.2中进行。结果:2014年至2020年,抗抑郁药患者销售额(平均14.7 DID/月)显著增加(平均33.5 DID/月);β = 0.231;p结论:放宽SNGPC注册,可显著减少抗抑郁药销售记录。这一措施影响了巴西药物流行病学数据和研究的可得性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信