Caregiver Feeding Practices in Guinea: Implications for Infant Dietary Diversity

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Teresa R. Schwendler, Kathleen L. Keller, Leif Jensen, Muzi Na, Mohamed L. Fofana, Mamady Daffé, Hermine Sankhon, Stephen R. Kodish
{"title":"Caregiver Feeding Practices in Guinea: Implications for Infant Dietary Diversity","authors":"Teresa R. Schwendler,&nbsp;Kathleen L. Keller,&nbsp;Leif Jensen,&nbsp;Muzi Na,&nbsp;Mohamed L. Fofana,&nbsp;Mamady Daffé,&nbsp;Hermine Sankhon,&nbsp;Stephen R. Kodish","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which specific feeding styles may be associated with the diets of infants aged 6–9 months in Guinea. This study was designed to have multiple, iterative phases with methodological triangulation. During Phase 1 of data collection, direct observations (<i>n</i> = 10) were used to develop a tailored tool for Phase 2, during which 72 meal observations were conducted among infants aged 6–9 months to define caregiver feeding styles. Specific behaviours underlying established feeding styles were recorded at the level of the intended bite. Following each observation, infant diet diversity scores (DDS), or the number of food groups consumed in the previous 24 h, were collected. During Phase 3, we interviewed 34 caregivers to understand the drivers of their feeding styles. Caregiver feeding styles were determined using cluster analysis of observed behaviours and a linear regression was used to explore the relationship between feeding style and infant DDS. Textual data from interviews were thematically analysed to explain the drivers of feeding style. Caregivers were characterized as those using forceful (<i>n</i> = 12), responsive (<i>n</i> = 52) or uninvolved (<i>n</i> = 8) feeding styles. Our study found that responsive feeding was not associated with a higher DDS when controlling for child age in months. The most salient factors shaping feeding style in this setting included perception around infant and young child developmental stage, food refusals and trust in infant cues. Overall, food insecurity may need to be addressed in addition to feeding styles to improve DDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.70017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which specific feeding styles may be associated with the diets of infants aged 6–9 months in Guinea. This study was designed to have multiple, iterative phases with methodological triangulation. During Phase 1 of data collection, direct observations (n = 10) were used to develop a tailored tool for Phase 2, during which 72 meal observations were conducted among infants aged 6–9 months to define caregiver feeding styles. Specific behaviours underlying established feeding styles were recorded at the level of the intended bite. Following each observation, infant diet diversity scores (DDS), or the number of food groups consumed in the previous 24 h, were collected. During Phase 3, we interviewed 34 caregivers to understand the drivers of their feeding styles. Caregiver feeding styles were determined using cluster analysis of observed behaviours and a linear regression was used to explore the relationship between feeding style and infant DDS. Textual data from interviews were thematically analysed to explain the drivers of feeding style. Caregivers were characterized as those using forceful (n = 12), responsive (n = 52) or uninvolved (n = 8) feeding styles. Our study found that responsive feeding was not associated with a higher DDS when controlling for child age in months. The most salient factors shaping feeding style in this setting included perception around infant and young child developmental stage, food refusals and trust in infant cues. Overall, food insecurity may need to be addressed in addition to feeding styles to improve DDS.

Abstract Image

几内亚看护者喂养实践:对婴儿饮食多样性的影响。
本研究的目的是评估特定喂养方式在多大程度上可能与几内亚6-9个月婴儿的饮食有关。本研究采用方法学三角测量法设计了多个迭代阶段。在第一阶段的数据收集中,直接观察(n = 10)用于开发第二阶段的定制工具,在第二阶段,对6-9个月大的婴儿进行了72次用餐观察,以确定照顾者的喂养方式。在既定的进食方式的基础上记录特定的行为,在预期的咬伤水平。每次观察后,收集婴儿饮食多样性评分(DDS),即前24小时内消耗的食物组数量。在第三阶段,我们采访了34名护理人员,以了解他们喂养方式的驱动因素。采用观察行为聚类分析确定照顾者喂养方式,并采用线性回归探讨喂养方式与婴儿DDS之间的关系。从访谈的文本数据进行主题分析,以解释喂养方式的驱动因素。护理人员的特点是使用强势(n = 12),反应性(n = 52)或不参与(n = 8)喂养方式。我们的研究发现,在控制儿童月龄时,反应性喂养与较高的DDS无关。在这种情况下,影响喂养方式的最显著因素包括对婴幼儿发育阶段的感知、食物拒绝和对婴儿线索的信任。总的来说,除了喂养方式之外,可能还需要解决粮食不安全问题,以改善DDS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信