Sean J Domal, Austen Maniscalco, Justin Visak, Michael Dohopolski, Dominic Moon, Vladimir Avkshtol, Dan Nguyen, Steve Jiang, David Sher, Mu-Han Lin
{"title":"Closing the gap in plan quality: Leveraging deep-learning dose prediction for adaptive radiotherapy.","authors":"Sean J Domal, Austen Maniscalco, Justin Visak, Michael Dohopolski, Dominic Moon, Vladimir Avkshtol, Dan Nguyen, Steve Jiang, David Sher, Mu-Han Lin","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Balancing quality and efficiency has been a challenge for online adaptive therapy. Most systems start the online re-optimization with the original planning goals. While some systems allow planners to modify the planning goals, achieving a high-quality plan within time constraints remains a common barrier. This study aims to bolster plan quality by leveraging a deep-learning dose prediction model to predict new planning goals that account for inter-fractional anatomical changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fine-tuned patient-specific (FT-PS) models were clinically evaluated to accurately predict dose for 23 adaptive fractions of 15 head-and-neck (H&N) patients treated with Ethos ART. The original adapted plan from the adaptive treatment session was used as the quality baseline. Based on physician-approved adaptive treatment contours, the FT-PS model predicted subsequent planning goals for high-impact organs at risk (OARs). These goals were retrospectively re-optimized in Ethos to compare the original adapted plan (IOE-Auto Plan) with the newly re-optimized plan (AI-guided IOE Plan). A physician blindly selected the preferred plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dose savings were observed for nine high impact OAR's including the constrictor, ipsilateral/contralateral parotid, ipsilateral/contralateral submandibular gland, oral cavity, and esophagus, mandible and larynx with a maximum value of 5.47 Gy. Of the 23 plans reviewed in the blind observer study, 19 re-optimized plans were chosen over the original adapted session plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing an AI dose predictor to predict optimal planning goals with anatomical changes, thereby improving adaptive plan quality. This method is feasible for both online and offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and has the potential to significantly enhance treatment outcomes for head-and-neck (H&N) cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Balancing quality and efficiency has been a challenge for online adaptive therapy. Most systems start the online re-optimization with the original planning goals. While some systems allow planners to modify the planning goals, achieving a high-quality plan within time constraints remains a common barrier. This study aims to bolster plan quality by leveraging a deep-learning dose prediction model to predict new planning goals that account for inter-fractional anatomical changes.
Methods: Fine-tuned patient-specific (FT-PS) models were clinically evaluated to accurately predict dose for 23 adaptive fractions of 15 head-and-neck (H&N) patients treated with Ethos ART. The original adapted plan from the adaptive treatment session was used as the quality baseline. Based on physician-approved adaptive treatment contours, the FT-PS model predicted subsequent planning goals for high-impact organs at risk (OARs). These goals were retrospectively re-optimized in Ethos to compare the original adapted plan (IOE-Auto Plan) with the newly re-optimized plan (AI-guided IOE Plan). A physician blindly selected the preferred plan.
Results: Dose savings were observed for nine high impact OAR's including the constrictor, ipsilateral/contralateral parotid, ipsilateral/contralateral submandibular gland, oral cavity, and esophagus, mandible and larynx with a maximum value of 5.47 Gy. Of the 23 plans reviewed in the blind observer study, 19 re-optimized plans were chosen over the original adapted session plan.
Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing an AI dose predictor to predict optimal planning goals with anatomical changes, thereby improving adaptive plan quality. This method is feasible for both online and offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and has the potential to significantly enhance treatment outcomes for head-and-neck (H&N) cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic