A systematic review of electron FLASH dosimetry and beam control mechanisms utilized with modified non-clinical LINACs

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Justin DeFrancisco, Siyong Kim
{"title":"A systematic review of electron FLASH dosimetry and beam control mechanisms utilized with modified non-clinical LINACs","authors":"Justin DeFrancisco,&nbsp;Siyong Kim","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>FLASH has been shown to spare normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. However, existing irradiation platforms and dosimetry are not compatible. Consequently, an abundance of FLASH delivery devices and new dosimetry across all modalities has been created. Many review articles concluded that dosimetry is modality-dependent. Focusing on electrons, researchers have modified clinical LINACs to enable FLASH dose rates. Modified LINACs caused the development of unique control systems that have yet to be characterized. Improvement could be made when considering the organization of reviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically perform a literature survey on electron FLASH dosimetry and beam control mechanisms with modified LINACs, detail where articles originated, and organize the results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A literature survey was performed from two websites using specified keywords and sifted results to find articles that fit the criteria. The results were organized in tables and summaries effectively by matching up dosimeters with their measurement goal, referring to their specific models, outlining the irradiation conditions they were tested in, and detailing their calibration procedure. Furthermore, included was the unique topic of control mechanisms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight matches were found. Various dosimeters were examined to measure absorbed dose, beam characteristics (BC), dose per pulse (DPP), and pulse counting (PC). Specific detectors and the irradiation conditions are organized and presented in a table. Each model's pros and cons are presented in another table for further consideration. A third table is provided to detail beam control methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Dosimetry is majorly film-based for absorbed dose and beam characteristic measurements. Many candidates for dosimeters for the use of DPP and PC have been tested, but they have yet to be tested without limitations. Beam control mechanisms primarily consist of unacceptable delivery errors. Many suggestions for improvement were given, mainly consisting of finding new dosimeters and modulating the dose DPP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70051","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

FLASH has been shown to spare normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. However, existing irradiation platforms and dosimetry are not compatible. Consequently, an abundance of FLASH delivery devices and new dosimetry across all modalities has been created. Many review articles concluded that dosimetry is modality-dependent. Focusing on electrons, researchers have modified clinical LINACs to enable FLASH dose rates. Modified LINACs caused the development of unique control systems that have yet to be characterized. Improvement could be made when considering the organization of reviews.

Purpose

To systematically perform a literature survey on electron FLASH dosimetry and beam control mechanisms with modified LINACs, detail where articles originated, and organize the results.

Methods

A literature survey was performed from two websites using specified keywords and sifted results to find articles that fit the criteria. The results were organized in tables and summaries effectively by matching up dosimeters with their measurement goal, referring to their specific models, outlining the irradiation conditions they were tested in, and detailing their calibration procedure. Furthermore, included was the unique topic of control mechanisms.

Results

Twenty-eight matches were found. Various dosimeters were examined to measure absorbed dose, beam characteristics (BC), dose per pulse (DPP), and pulse counting (PC). Specific detectors and the irradiation conditions are organized and presented in a table. Each model's pros and cons are presented in another table for further consideration. A third table is provided to detail beam control methods.

Conclusions

Dosimetry is majorly film-based for absorbed dose and beam characteristic measurements. Many candidates for dosimeters for the use of DPP and PC have been tested, but they have yet to be tested without limitations. Beam control mechanisms primarily consist of unacceptable delivery errors. Many suggestions for improvement were given, mainly consisting of finding new dosimeters and modulating the dose DPP.

Abstract Image

电子闪光剂量测定和光束控制机制的系统回顾与改进的非临床LINACs。
背景:FLASH已被证明在维持肿瘤控制的同时避免正常组织毒性。然而,现有的辐照平台和剂量测定法并不兼容。因此,已经创建了大量的FLASH输送设备和所有模式的新剂量测定法。许多综述文章得出结论,剂量学是模态依赖的。专注于电子,研究人员已经修改了临床LINACs以实现FLASH剂量率。改进的直线感应控制器引起了独特的控制系统的发展,但尚未被表征。在考虑评审的组织时,可以进行改进。目的:系统地对电子闪光剂量学和改进的LINACs光束控制机制进行文献综述,详细说明文章来源,并整理结果。方法:从两个网站进行文献调查,使用指定的关键词和筛选结果,以找到符合标准的文章。通过将剂量计与其测量目标相匹配,参考其特定模型,概述其测试的辐照条件,并详细说明其校准程序,有效地将结果组织在表格和摘要中。此外,还包括控制机制的独特主题。结果:共匹配28例。使用各种剂量计测量吸收剂量、光束特性(BC)、每脉冲剂量(DPP)和脉冲计数(PC)。具体的探测器和辐照条件被组织并呈现在表格中。每个模型的优缺点在另一个表中列出,以供进一步考虑。第三个表格提供了详细的光束控制方法。结论:剂量学主要是基于膜的吸收剂量和光束特性测量。许多用于使用DPP和PC的候选剂量计已经进行了测试,但它们尚未进行无限制的测试。波束控制机制主要由不可接受的传送错误组成。提出了改进建议,主要包括寻找新的剂量计和调整剂量DPP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信