WHO global research agenda for hand hygiene improvement in health care: a Delphi consensus study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Benedetta Allegranzi, Ermira Tartari, Claire Kilpatrick, Julie Storr, Nita Bellare, João Bana, Ana Flávia Santos, Sarah Charnaud, Anna Laura Ross, Mitchell J Schwaber, Didier Pittet
{"title":"WHO global research agenda for hand hygiene improvement in health care: a Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Benedetta Allegranzi, Ermira Tartari, Claire Kilpatrick, Julie Storr, Nita Bellare, João Bana, Ana Flávia Santos, Sarah Charnaud, Anna Laura Ross, Mitchell J Schwaber, Didier Pittet","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify global research priorities for improving hand hygiene in healthcare settings and develop a 2023-2030 research agenda to guide funding, coordinate research, promote investment, and inform policy for enhanced healthcare quality and safety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Expert consensus study using a modified Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A 105-member panel of international hand hygiene experts including the World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare representing all WHO regions and World Bank income levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research priorities were identified through a multiphase approach including a meta-review to establish knowledge gaps and inform initial priorities, followed by expert consultations using a modified Delphi process. 192 preliminary priorities were included in a two-round Delphi survey. Experts rated each priority in the first round, and then reviewed and adjusted responses based on the panel's aggregated, anonymous responses in the second round. Ratings were collected on a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as a combined \"strongly agree\" and \"agree\" frequency of at least 70%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was achieved for 178 of 192 priorities (92.7%), categorized into six domains: system change; training and education; evaluation and feedback; reminders and communications; institutional safety climate; and hand hygiene improvement impact on healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. Of these, 121 priorities reached >80% consensus. The Delphi process, maintained a 92% response rate over two rounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A structured consensus process yielded a research agenda to address gaps in hand hygiene improvement, supporting enhanced healthcare quality and safety globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7617569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.32","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify global research priorities for improving hand hygiene in healthcare settings and develop a 2023-2030 research agenda to guide funding, coordinate research, promote investment, and inform policy for enhanced healthcare quality and safety.

Design: Expert consensus study using a modified Delphi process.

Participants: A 105-member panel of international hand hygiene experts including the World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare representing all WHO regions and World Bank income levels.

Methods: The research priorities were identified through a multiphase approach including a meta-review to establish knowledge gaps and inform initial priorities, followed by expert consultations using a modified Delphi process. 192 preliminary priorities were included in a two-round Delphi survey. Experts rated each priority in the first round, and then reviewed and adjusted responses based on the panel's aggregated, anonymous responses in the second round. Ratings were collected on a five-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as a combined "strongly agree" and "agree" frequency of at least 70%.

Results: Consensus was achieved for 178 of 192 priorities (92.7%), categorized into six domains: system change; training and education; evaluation and feedback; reminders and communications; institutional safety climate; and hand hygiene improvement impact on healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. Of these, 121 priorities reached >80% consensus. The Delphi process, maintained a 92% response rate over two rounds.

Conclusions: A structured consensus process yielded a research agenda to address gaps in hand hygiene improvement, supporting enhanced healthcare quality and safety globally.

世卫组织改善卫生保健中的手部卫生全球研究议程:德尔菲共识研究。
目的:确定改善卫生保健机构手部卫生的全球研究重点,并制定2023-2030年研究议程,以指导资助、协调研究、促进投资,并为提高卫生保健质量和安全提供政策信息。设计:采用改进的德尔菲法进行专家共识研究。与会者:105名国际手卫生专家小组,包括世界卫生组织(世卫组织)卫生保健手卫生技术咨询专家组,代表世卫组织所有区域和世界银行的收入水平。方法:通过多阶段方法确定研究重点,包括建立知识差距和告知初始优先事项的元综述,然后使用改进的德尔菲过程进行专家咨询。在两轮德尔菲调查中包括192个初步优先事项。专家们在第一轮中对每个问题的优先级进行了评级,然后在第二轮中根据专家小组汇总的匿名回答对答案进行了审查和调整。评分是按照李克特五分制收集的。共识被定义为“非常同意”和“同意”频率至少为70%的组合。结果:192个优先事项中的178个(92.7%)达成共识,分为六个领域:制度变革;培训和教育;评估与反馈;提醒和通讯;制度安全气候;改善手部卫生对卫生保健相关感染和抗菌素耐药性的影响。其中,121项优先事项达成80%以上共识。德尔菲过程在两轮中保持了92%的回复率。结论:一个结构化的共识过程产生了一个研究议程,以解决手部卫生改善方面的差距,支持提高全球卫生保健质量和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信