Dying at home: a prospective comparative study of home death rates in a private health insured palliative care community programme.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dominic Eu, Amanda Fischer, Alison Griffin, Matthew Lancaster, Phillip Good
{"title":"Dying at home: a prospective comparative study of home death rates in a private health insured palliative care community programme.","authors":"Dominic Eu, Amanda Fischer, Alison Griffin, Matthew Lancaster, Phillip Good","doi":"10.1111/imj.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite preferring end-of-life care at home, only a small percentage of deaths in Australia occur in private homes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluates a private health insurance-funded support programme (provided in addition to the standard level of community palliative care), the rates of home death, the percentage of patients who died in their preferred location and the satisfaction with the care provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients in two cohorts: the Medibank cohort (with private health insurance, a prognosis of less than 3 months, a preference for home death) and the standard cohort (publicly funded patients, with no limitation to prognosis or preferred place of death). Demographics and preferences for place of death were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first 12 months of the study are reported here with 132 patients (Medibank cohort, n = 67; standard cohort, n = 65). Medibank patients that died had significantly shorter contact with the service compared with the standard cohort (median 13.5 days vs 39 days), a higher home death rate (79% vs 44%) and a higher rate of preference for a home death (97% vs 59%). The proportion of deaths in the patients' preferred location was similar for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high home death rate observed in the Medibank cohort highlights the potential benefit of enhanced palliative care support at the end of life. This support should be dedicated, accessible and resourced with in-home nursing assistance and allied health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite preferring end-of-life care at home, only a small percentage of deaths in Australia occur in private homes.

Aim: This study evaluates a private health insurance-funded support programme (provided in addition to the standard level of community palliative care), the rates of home death, the percentage of patients who died in their preferred location and the satisfaction with the care provided.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients in two cohorts: the Medibank cohort (with private health insurance, a prognosis of less than 3 months, a preference for home death) and the standard cohort (publicly funded patients, with no limitation to prognosis or preferred place of death). Demographics and preferences for place of death were collected.

Results: The first 12 months of the study are reported here with 132 patients (Medibank cohort, n = 67; standard cohort, n = 65). Medibank patients that died had significantly shorter contact with the service compared with the standard cohort (median 13.5 days vs 39 days), a higher home death rate (79% vs 44%) and a higher rate of preference for a home death (97% vs 59%). The proportion of deaths in the patients' preferred location was similar for both groups.

Conclusion: The high home death rate observed in the Medibank cohort highlights the potential benefit of enhanced palliative care support at the end of life. This support should be dedicated, accessible and resourced with in-home nursing assistance and allied health interventions.

在家中死亡:一个私人健康保险缓和治疗社区方案中家庭死亡率的前瞻性比较研究。
背景:尽管人们更喜欢在家中进行临终关怀,但在澳大利亚,只有很小比例的死亡发生在私人家中。目的:本研究评估了私人健康保险资助的支持方案(在社区姑息治疗标准水平之外提供)、家庭死亡率、在首选地点死亡的患者百分比以及对所提供护理的满意度。方法:这项前瞻性研究将患者纳入两个队列:Medibank队列(拥有私人医疗保险,预后少于3个月,倾向于在家死亡)和标准队列(公共资助的患者,没有预后或首选死亡地点的限制)。收集了死亡地点的人口统计数据和偏好。结果:研究的前12个月报告了132例患者(Medibank队列,n = 67;标准队列,n = 65)。与标准队列相比,死亡的Medibank患者与服务的接触时间明显缩短(中位数为13.5天对39天),家庭死亡率更高(79%对44%),更倾向于家庭死亡(97%对59%)。两组患者首选位置的死亡比例相似。结论:在Medibank队列中观察到的高家庭死亡率突出了在生命末期加强姑息治疗支持的潜在益处。这种支持应该是专门的、可获得的和资源充足的,包括家庭护理援助和相关的卫生干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信