{"title":"Risk factors for drug-resistant pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Natsuki Nakagawa, Masahiro Katsurada, Yosuke Fukuda, Shingo Noguchi, Nobuyuki Horita, Makoto Miki, Hiroki Tsukada, Kazuyoshi Senda, Yuichiro Shindo, Hiroshi Mukae","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0183-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Reducing inappropriate and excessive use of extended-spectrum antibiotics is essential for treating CAP effectively. Evaluating the risk of drug-resistant pathogens (DRPs) is crucial for determining initial antibiotic therapy in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the risk factors for DRPs in patients with CAP. CAP-DRPs were defined as pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotics for CAP, including nonpseudomonal β-lactams such as ceftriaxone or sulbactam-ampicillin, macrolides and respiratory fluoroquinolones. The studies included were divided into two cohorts, namely an all-patient cohort, comprising both culture-positive and culture-negative patients, and a culture-positive pneumonia cohort, comprising patients with identified causative pathogens. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for CAP-DRPs in the all-patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 articles were included with 11 categorised into the all-patient cohort. The meta-analysis identified 11 significant risk factors for CAP-DRPs, namely prior DRP infection/colonisation, tracheostomy, severe respiratory failure requiring early induction of mechanical ventilation, prior use of antibiotics, chronic lung disease, COPD, wound care, neurological disorders, prior hospitalisation, nursing home residence and low activities of daily living.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review focused on CAP-DRP. Unlike previous reviews, the all-patient and culture-positive pneumonia cohorts were analysed separately. Findings from the all-patient cohort are particularly relevant for guiding initial antimicrobial selection in clinical practice. Furthermore, the abovementioned factors should be considered when developing prediction models for CAP-DRPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 175","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0183-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Reducing inappropriate and excessive use of extended-spectrum antibiotics is essential for treating CAP effectively. Evaluating the risk of drug-resistant pathogens (DRPs) is crucial for determining initial antibiotic therapy in clinical settings.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the risk factors for DRPs in patients with CAP. CAP-DRPs were defined as pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotics for CAP, including nonpseudomonal β-lactams such as ceftriaxone or sulbactam-ampicillin, macrolides and respiratory fluoroquinolones. The studies included were divided into two cohorts, namely an all-patient cohort, comprising both culture-positive and culture-negative patients, and a culture-positive pneumonia cohort, comprising patients with identified causative pathogens. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for CAP-DRPs in the all-patient cohort.
Results: 24 articles were included with 11 categorised into the all-patient cohort. The meta-analysis identified 11 significant risk factors for CAP-DRPs, namely prior DRP infection/colonisation, tracheostomy, severe respiratory failure requiring early induction of mechanical ventilation, prior use of antibiotics, chronic lung disease, COPD, wound care, neurological disorders, prior hospitalisation, nursing home residence and low activities of daily living.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review focused on CAP-DRP. Unlike previous reviews, the all-patient and culture-positive pneumonia cohorts were analysed separately. Findings from the all-patient cohort are particularly relevant for guiding initial antimicrobial selection in clinical practice. Furthermore, the abovementioned factors should be considered when developing prediction models for CAP-DRPs.
期刊介绍:
The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.