Genetic diversity affects ecosystem functions across trophic levels as much as species diversity, but in an opposite direction.

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.7554/eLife.100041
Laura Fargeot, Camille Poesy, Maxim Lefort, Jerome G Prunier, Madoka Krick, Rik Verdonck, Charlotte Veyssiere, Murielle Richard, Delphine Legrand, Geraldine Loot, Blanchet Simon
{"title":"Genetic diversity affects ecosystem functions across trophic levels as much as species diversity, but in an opposite direction.","authors":"Laura Fargeot, Camille Poesy, Maxim Lefort, Jerome G Prunier, Madoka Krick, Rik Verdonck, Charlotte Veyssiere, Murielle Richard, Delphine Legrand, Geraldine Loot, Blanchet Simon","doi":"10.7554/eLife.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels - primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers - in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity - gauged within three pivotal species - within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.100041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning stands as a cornerstone in ecological research. Extensive evidence now underscores the profound impact of species loss on the stability and dynamics of ecosystem functions. However, it remains unclear whether the loss of genetic diversity within key species yields similar consequences. Here, we delve into the intricate relationship between species diversity, genetic diversity, and ecosystem functions across three trophic levels - primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers - in natural aquatic ecosystems. Our investigation involves estimating species diversity and genome-wide diversity - gauged within three pivotal species - within each trophic level, evaluating seven key ecosystem functions, and analyzing the magnitude of the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions (BEFs). We found that, overall, the absolute effect size of genetic diversity on ecosystem functions mirrors that of species diversity in natural ecosystems. We nonetheless unveil a striking dichotomy: while genetic diversity was positively correlated with various ecosystem functions, species diversity displays a negative correlation with these functions. These intriguing antagonist effects of species and genetic diversity persist across the three trophic levels (underscoring its systemic nature), but were apparent only when BEFs were assessed within trophic levels rather than across them. This study reveals the complexity of predicting the consequences of genetic and species diversity loss under natural conditions, and emphasizes the need for further mechanistic models integrating these two facets of biodiversity.

遗传多样性对生态系统功能的影响与物种多样性一样多,但方向相反。
了解生物多样性和生态系统功能之间的关系是生态学研究的基石。现在有大量证据强调物种丧失对生态系统功能的稳定性和动态性的深远影响。然而,目前尚不清楚关键物种遗传多样性的丧失是否会产生类似的后果。在这里,我们深入研究物种多样性、遗传多样性和生态系统功能之间的复杂关系,跨越三个营养水平-初级生产者、初级消费者和次级消费者-在自然水生生态系统中。我们的研究包括估计物种多样性和全基因组多样性(在三个关键物种中测量),在每个营养水平,评估七个关键的生态系统功能,并分析生物多样性和生态系统功能(bef)之间关系的大小。总体而言,遗传多样性对生态系统功能的绝对效应大小反映了自然生态系统中物种多样性的绝对效应大小。尽管如此,我们还是揭示了一个惊人的二分法:遗传多样性与各种生态系统功能呈正相关,而物种多样性与这些功能呈负相关。这些有趣的物种和遗传多样性的拮抗作用在三个营养水平上持续存在(强调其系统性),但只有在营养水平内评估bef而不是跨营养水平评估bef时才明显。该研究揭示了在自然条件下预测遗传和物种多样性损失后果的复杂性,并强调需要进一步建立综合生物多样性这两个方面的机制模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信