Pharmacokinetic Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Stefan P H van den Berg, Alyssa A Toorop, Femke Hooijberg, Gertjan Wolbink, Nivea M F Voelkner, Liza M Y Gelissen, Joep Killestein, Zoé L E van Kempen, Thomas P C Dorlo, Theo Rispens
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Stefan P H van den Berg, Alyssa A Toorop, Femke Hooijberg, Gertjan Wolbink, Nivea M F Voelkner, Liza M Y Gelissen, Joep Killestein, Zoé L E van Kempen, Thomas P C Dorlo, Theo Rispens","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous natalizumab is an effective treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, the standard treatment interval of 4 weeks may be excessive for many patients. Personalized interval extension using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can result in adequate drug exposure while reducing hospital visits and healthcare costs. Here, we investigate to which extent TDM-guided personalized dosing can benefit from model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Individual posterior PK estimates were derived using patient weight and two trough concentrations at the standard dose interval by Bayesian estimation using a newly developed population PK model. MIPD was compared to a previously deployed TDM-guided stratified personalized dosing protocol (SPD) using a decision tree to personalize dosing intervals. Accuracy (mean prediction error) of the predicted dosing intervals was 4.8% versus 24% for model-informed estimates versus decision tree, respectively, when aiming for a 10 μg/mL trough concentration, and 4.8% versus 86% when aiming for 5 μg/mL. Corresponding precision (root mean square error) was 2.3 versus 4.0, and 1.5 versus 5 μg/mL. Finally, we evaluated the feasibility of a MIPD approach to attain a therapeutic trough of 2 μg/mL. Simulating MIPD showed a reduction in the average infusions versus the standard interval by 40%, with an average dose interval of 7 weeks, while maintaining adequate drug exposure. MIPD was concluded to be superior to the conventional TDM-guided personalized dosing approach in terms of enhanced precision in individual dose interval selection, enabling more efficient interval extensions. Simulations supported the clinical deployment of natalizumab MIPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous natalizumab is an effective treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, the standard treatment interval of 4 weeks may be excessive for many patients. Personalized interval extension using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can result in adequate drug exposure while reducing hospital visits and healthcare costs. Here, we investigate to which extent TDM-guided personalized dosing can benefit from model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Individual posterior PK estimates were derived using patient weight and two trough concentrations at the standard dose interval by Bayesian estimation using a newly developed population PK model. MIPD was compared to a previously deployed TDM-guided stratified personalized dosing protocol (SPD) using a decision tree to personalize dosing intervals. Accuracy (mean prediction error) of the predicted dosing intervals was 4.8% versus 24% for model-informed estimates versus decision tree, respectively, when aiming for a 10 μg/mL trough concentration, and 4.8% versus 86% when aiming for 5 μg/mL. Corresponding precision (root mean square error) was 2.3 versus 4.0, and 1.5 versus 5 μg/mL. Finally, we evaluated the feasibility of a MIPD approach to attain a therapeutic trough of 2 μg/mL. Simulating MIPD showed a reduction in the average infusions versus the standard interval by 40%, with an average dose interval of 7 weeks, while maintaining adequate drug exposure. MIPD was concluded to be superior to the conventional TDM-guided personalized dosing approach in terms of enhanced precision in individual dose interval selection, enabling more efficient interval extensions. Simulations supported the clinical deployment of natalizumab MIPD.

基于药代动力学模型的纳他珠单抗在多发性硬化症中的精确给药
静脉注射那他珠单抗是治疗复发-缓解型多发性硬化症的有效方法。然而,对于许多患者来说,4周的标准治疗间隔可能过长。使用治疗性药物监测(TDM)的个性化间隔延长可以导致充分的药物暴露,同时减少医院就诊和医疗保健费用。在这里,我们研究了tdm引导的个性化给药在多大程度上可以从模型信息精确给药(MIPD)中受益。个体后验药代动力学估计是利用新开发的群体药代动力学模型,通过贝叶斯估计,根据患者体重和标准剂量间隔下的两个谷浓度得出的。将MIPD与之前部署的tdm指导的分层个性化给药方案(SPD)进行比较,使用决策树来个性化给药间隔。以10 μg/mL谷浓度为目标时,预测剂量间隔的准确性(平均预测误差)分别为4.8%和24%,以5 μg/mL为目标时,预测剂量间隔的准确性(平均预测误差)为4.8%和86%。相应的精密度(均方根误差)分别为2.3和4.0,1.5和5 μg/mL。最后,我们评估了MIPD方法获得2 μg/mL治疗谷的可行性。模拟MIPD显示平均输注量比标准间隔减少40%,平均剂量间隔为7周,同时保持足够的药物暴露。在提高个体剂量间隔选择的精度方面,MIPD优于传统的tdm引导的个性化给药方法,能够更有效地延长间隔。模拟支持natalizumab MIPD的临床部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信