Validation of a discrete electrographic seizure detection algorithm for extended-duration, reduced-channel wearable EEG.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/epi.18365
Tyler J Newton, Mitchell A Frankel, Zoë Tosi, Avidor B Kazen, Vamshi K Muvvala, Tobias Loddenkemper, Mark C Spitz, Laura Strom, Daniel Friedman, Mark J Lehmkuhle
{"title":"Validation of a discrete electrographic seizure detection algorithm for extended-duration, reduced-channel wearable EEG.","authors":"Tyler J Newton, Mitchell A Frankel, Zoë Tosi, Avidor B Kazen, Vamshi K Muvvala, Tobias Loddenkemper, Mark C Spitz, Laura Strom, Daniel Friedman, Mark J Lehmkuhle","doi":"10.1111/epi.18365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reduced-channel wearable electroencephalography (EEG) may overcome the accessibility and patient comfort limitations of traditional ambulatory electrographic seizure monitoring during extended-duration use. Automated algorithms are necessary for review of extended-duration reduced-channel EEG, yet current clinical support software is designed only for full-montage recordings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The performance of a novel automated seizure detection algorithm for reduced-channel EEG (Epitel) was evaluated in a clinical validation study involving 50 participants (31 with seizures) with diverse demographic and seizure representation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm demonstrated an event-level sensitivity of 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79.5%-93.2%) and a false detection rate of .162 per hour (95% CI = .116-.221), which is comparable to the performance of current clinical software for full-montage EEG. Performance varied by electrographic seizure type, with 91.4% sensitivity for focal evolving to generalized seizures, 86.7% for generalized seizures, and 77.3% for focal seizures. The algorithm maintained robust performance in both pediatric participants aged 6-21 years (83% sensitivity) and adults aged 22+ years (90% sensitivity), as well as in ambulatory (80%) and epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) monitoring environments (87.5%). The false detection rate in ambulatory monitoring environments (.290 false positive [FP] detections/h), all of which involved pediatric participants, was notably higher than in the EMU (.136 FP/h), indicating an area with clear need for improvement for unrestricted at-home monitoring. The algorithm's supplemental Confidence metric, designed to engender trust in the algorithm, showed a strong correlation with detection precision.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These results suggest that this algorithm can provide crucial support for review of extended-duration reduced-channel wearable EEG, enabling electrographic seizure monitoring with no restrictions on a person's daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Reduced-channel wearable electroencephalography (EEG) may overcome the accessibility and patient comfort limitations of traditional ambulatory electrographic seizure monitoring during extended-duration use. Automated algorithms are necessary for review of extended-duration reduced-channel EEG, yet current clinical support software is designed only for full-montage recordings.

Methods: The performance of a novel automated seizure detection algorithm for reduced-channel EEG (Epitel) was evaluated in a clinical validation study involving 50 participants (31 with seizures) with diverse demographic and seizure representation.

Results: The algorithm demonstrated an event-level sensitivity of 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79.5%-93.2%) and a false detection rate of .162 per hour (95% CI = .116-.221), which is comparable to the performance of current clinical software for full-montage EEG. Performance varied by electrographic seizure type, with 91.4% sensitivity for focal evolving to generalized seizures, 86.7% for generalized seizures, and 77.3% for focal seizures. The algorithm maintained robust performance in both pediatric participants aged 6-21 years (83% sensitivity) and adults aged 22+ years (90% sensitivity), as well as in ambulatory (80%) and epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) monitoring environments (87.5%). The false detection rate in ambulatory monitoring environments (.290 false positive [FP] detections/h), all of which involved pediatric participants, was notably higher than in the EMU (.136 FP/h), indicating an area with clear need for improvement for unrestricted at-home monitoring. The algorithm's supplemental Confidence metric, designed to engender trust in the algorithm, showed a strong correlation with detection precision.

Significance: These results suggest that this algorithm can provide crucial support for review of extended-duration reduced-channel wearable EEG, enabling electrographic seizure monitoring with no restrictions on a person's daily life.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信