Prevalence and Patterns of Use of Natural Health Products and Medicines in New Zealand: A Pilot Study Using an Online Market Research Panel.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
E Lyn Lee, Jeff Harrison, Joanne Barnes
{"title":"Prevalence and Patterns of Use of Natural Health Products and Medicines in New Zealand: A Pilot Study Using an Online Market Research Panel.","authors":"E Lyn Lee, Jeff Harrison, Joanne Barnes","doi":"10.1007/s40801-025-00482-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM), including natural health products (NHPs), are used by many consumers to address their [perceived] health needs. While many developed countries have national data on NHPs use, limited information is available for New Zealand (NZ). Current, robust data on the prevalence and patterns of NHPs use in NZ are required.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project explored the feasibility of conducting a national study and collecting preliminary data on the prevalence and patterns of use of NHPs, including access to and expenditure on NHPs, and of the use of conventional medicines in NZ using a newly designed bespoke questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was administered to a sample of the adult population in NZ via an online market research panel in November 2021. Self-reported data on participants' use of NHPs (including photographs of products), consultations with TCAM practitioners and use of conventional medicines were collected. Data on the prevalence and patterns of use of NHPs were analysed and reported using descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of sociodemographic variables on NHPs, TCAM practitioners and conventional medicines use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample comprised 992 participants. Sociodemographic data for these participants were comparable to those reported for the NZ Census 2018. The frequency of missing data was < 10% for most of the questions; data quality for broad-level prevalence analysis was good, but was moderate to poor for analysis at the specific NHP or TCAM practitioner level. The specific product(s) and their respective ingredient list(s) could not be determined for most NHPs described as photographs were not uploaded, rendering product names unverifiable. Preliminary data indicate that 57.6% of participants have used NHPs and 22.9% consulted a TCAM practitioner in the last 12 months. Among current NHP users, 71.1% concurrently used one or more conventional medicines. Over half (53%) of the NHPs were self-selected (not recommended by a health practitioner). The median daily cost per NHP was NZD 0.28 (interquartile range NZD 0.14-0.50) and the median cost for visits to a TCAM practitioner over the last 12 months was NZD 120 (interquartile range NZD 40-270). Female participants, younger individuals and conventional medicine users were more likely to use NHPs/consult a TCAM practitioner/use any TCAM. Higher-income participants were more inclined to consult a TCAM practitioner. Individuals born overseas were more likely to use any type of TCAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a high prevalence of use of NHPs and of consultations with TCAM practitioners, which may reflect the extent of use in the general NZ population. Recognising the potential impact on patients' health outcomes, there is a need for a larger and nationally representative dataset, preferably linkable to other health data collections, to validate these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-025-00482-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM), including natural health products (NHPs), are used by many consumers to address their [perceived] health needs. While many developed countries have national data on NHPs use, limited information is available for New Zealand (NZ). Current, robust data on the prevalence and patterns of NHPs use in NZ are required.

Objective: This project explored the feasibility of conducting a national study and collecting preliminary data on the prevalence and patterns of use of NHPs, including access to and expenditure on NHPs, and of the use of conventional medicines in NZ using a newly designed bespoke questionnaire.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was administered to a sample of the adult population in NZ via an online market research panel in November 2021. Self-reported data on participants' use of NHPs (including photographs of products), consultations with TCAM practitioners and use of conventional medicines were collected. Data on the prevalence and patterns of use of NHPs were analysed and reported using descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of sociodemographic variables on NHPs, TCAM practitioners and conventional medicines use.

Results: The final sample comprised 992 participants. Sociodemographic data for these participants were comparable to those reported for the NZ Census 2018. The frequency of missing data was < 10% for most of the questions; data quality for broad-level prevalence analysis was good, but was moderate to poor for analysis at the specific NHP or TCAM practitioner level. The specific product(s) and their respective ingredient list(s) could not be determined for most NHPs described as photographs were not uploaded, rendering product names unverifiable. Preliminary data indicate that 57.6% of participants have used NHPs and 22.9% consulted a TCAM practitioner in the last 12 months. Among current NHP users, 71.1% concurrently used one or more conventional medicines. Over half (53%) of the NHPs were self-selected (not recommended by a health practitioner). The median daily cost per NHP was NZD 0.28 (interquartile range NZD 0.14-0.50) and the median cost for visits to a TCAM practitioner over the last 12 months was NZD 120 (interquartile range NZD 40-270). Female participants, younger individuals and conventional medicine users were more likely to use NHPs/consult a TCAM practitioner/use any TCAM. Higher-income participants were more inclined to consult a TCAM practitioner. Individuals born overseas were more likely to use any type of TCAM.

Conclusions: There was a high prevalence of use of NHPs and of consultations with TCAM practitioners, which may reflect the extent of use in the general NZ population. Recognising the potential impact on patients' health outcomes, there is a need for a larger and nationally representative dataset, preferably linkable to other health data collections, to validate these preliminary findings.

新西兰天然保健产品和药品的流行程度和使用模式:一项使用在线市场研究小组的试点研究。
背景:传统、补充和替代医学(TCAM),包括天然保健品(NHPs),被许多消费者用来满足他们(感知到的)健康需求。虽然许多发达国家都有国家卫生保健计划使用情况的国家数据,但新西兰的信息有限。目前,需要关于新西兰国家卫生保健计划使用的流行率和模式的可靠数据。目的:本项目探讨了开展一项全国性研究的可行性,并使用新设计的定制问卷,收集关于新西兰国家卫生保健计划的流行程度和使用模式的初步数据,包括国家卫生保健计划的获取和支出,以及传统药物的使用情况。方法:通过在线市场研究小组,于2021年11月对新西兰的成年人口样本进行了在线横断面调查。收集了参与者使用国家卫生保健计划(包括产品照片)、咨询TCAM从业者和使用常规药物的自我报告数据。使用描述性统计分析和报告了关于国家卫生保健计划的流行率和使用模式的数据。采用多变量logistic回归评估社会人口变量对NHPs、TCAM从业者和常规药物使用的影响。结果:最终样本包括992名参与者。这些参与者的社会人口统计数据与2018年新西兰人口普查报告的数据相当。大多数问题缺失数据的频率< 10%;广泛水平的患病率分析的数据质量是好的,但在特定的NHP或TCAM从业者水平上的分析是中等到较差的。具体的产品及其各自的成分表无法确定,因为大多数描述为照片的NHPs没有上传,导致产品名称无法核实。初步数据显示,在过去12个月里,57.6%的参与者使用过国家卫生保健计划,22.9%的参与者咨询过TCAM医生。在目前的NHP使用者中,71.1%同时使用一种或多种传统药物。超过一半(53%)的国家卫生服务提供者是自己选择的(不是由卫生从业人员推荐的)。每个NHP的每日费用中位数为0.28纽元(四分位数范围0.14-0.50纽元),过去12个月拜访TCAM医生的费用中位数为120纽元(四分位数范围40-270纽元)。女性参与者、年轻人和传统药物使用者更有可能使用NHPs/咨询TCAM从业者/使用任何TCAM。高收入的参与者更倾向于咨询TCAM从业者。海外出生的人更有可能使用任何类型的TCAM。结论:使用NHPs和咨询TCAM从业人员的比例很高,这可能反映了新西兰普通人群的使用程度。认识到对患者健康结果的潜在影响,需要一个更大的、具有全国代表性的数据集,最好能与其他卫生数据收集相关联,以验证这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信